Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Euangelion

The Church and Israel – Part 1

Last updated on: July 5, 2011 at 10:24 pm   by Michael F. Bird

The Church and Israel – Part 1 2011-07-05T22:24:19-04:00 Michael F. Bird

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

How does the Church relate to Israel? The question has been a perennial one ever since Jewish Christians believers began sharing their faith with fellow Jews (Acts 1–5). It became more of an issue when Jewish Christians were persecuted, denounced, expelled from synagogues, and even cursed as “heretics” by Jewish leaders (John 9:22; 12:42; 16:2; 2 Cor 11:24; Acts 8:1-3; 11:19; 12:1; Rev 2:9; Justin, Dial. Tryph.  16, 93, 95, 96, 123, 133). Christians who had been treated so might naturally ask, “Are we really one of them?” and “Are they really one of us?” It was the degree of continuity and discontinuity between Israel and the Church, between Law and Gospel, and between Christ and Moses, that provided the catalyst for the theological and sociological chemistry of the early Christian movement. The debates that the Jewish Christian apostle Paul had with other Jewish Christians in Antioch and Galatia was stimulated by this very question: Is Jesus merely an add on to the Mosaic covenant? What is precisely new in the new covenant?[1] Historically speaking, the church began as a renewal movement within Judaism prior to 70 AD, but after 70 AD it became a religious institution that had “parted ways” with common Judaism with a distinguishable set of beliefs and structures. What is more, Marcion’s program of trying to de-judaize Christianity led many of the Church Father’s to think through the Israelite ancestry of their faith and to ponder how to relate to the Jewish people as members of the Roman Empire. Much later, Reformed theology, with its penchant for “covenant” as the organic unity across the Bible, placed emphasis on the single and continuos plan for salvation that God had for his people. The problem was that it led to a view of supersession whereby the church had effectively replaced Israel as God’s people. A supersessionist theology combined with European anti-semitism, were intellectual forces that contributed to the Holocaust in the mid-20th century.

Christians have traditionally regarded the church as the “true Israel,” “spiritual Israel,” or “new Israel”. For example, Justin Martyr informed a Jew named Trypho that Christians “are the true Israelite race, the spiritual one, that of Judah and Jacob and Abraham” (Dial. Tryph. 11.5). Martin Luther declared that: “[T]he Jews are no longer Israel, for all things are to be new, and Israel must become new. Those alone are the true Israel who have accepted the new covenant, which was established and begun in Jerusalem.”[2] Karl Barth wrote that, “The Church is the historical successor to Israel.”[3] This perspective, whereby the church assumes the role, position, and blessings of Israel, has been questioned on two fronts. First, dispensational theology has traditionally made a distinction between the church and Israel. Ryrie went so far as to say that such a distinction was one of the essential elements of dispensational theology.[4] In progressive dispensationalism, however, the distinction is less prominent. In progressive dispensationalism, the Israel-church distinction is primarily a distinction between: (1) the dispensation of Israel, in which divine blessings were poured upon the nation, while the the Gentiles were alienated or subordinated; and (2) the present dispensation of the the church, where divine blessings are given to Jews and Gentiles, while national blessings are in abeyance. Accordingly: “Israel and the nations on the one hand and the church on the other are neither replacement peoples nor parallel, dual-track peoples but different redemptive dimensions of the same humanity.”[5] Yet Bock and Blaising still maintain that: “It is crucial to understand that promises made to Irsael are to be fulfilled by Israel and not in something reconstituted to take its place,”[6] and therein remains the point of contention. These contentions remains because Reformed theology has affirmed that the church inherits the promises given to Israel, be they redemptive, spiritual, or national. Second, several Pauline scholars insist that Paul regarded Jesus as Savior only for Gentiles and not for the Jews. The Jews are “saved” in their own Sonderweg (“special way”) under the terms of the Mosaic covenant. As such, Paul envisaged Israel as a continuing entity with her own set of privileges and blessing that was still available for them. The role of Jesus was to bring Gentiles into this heritage of Israel and Israel’s only problem was those who denied that Jesus was the instrument to redeem the Gentiles. [7] One scholar writes: “Paul nowhere addresses his churches as Israel. Nor does he transfer to them Israel’s distinctive attributes.”[8] In which case, the church is not “Israel” – a replacement theology that gave rise to anti-semitism – instead, the church is a religious philosophy or collegia within the Roman world, built on a hybrid of Jewish-Hellenistic beliefs and values.


[1] Cf. Michael F. Bird, “New Testament Theology Reloaded: Integrating Biblical Theology and Christian Origins,” Tyndale Bulletin 60 (2009): 161-87.

[2] Martin Luther, LW 35: 287-88.

[3] Barth, CD 2/3:290.

[4] Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today, 47.

[5] Darrell L. Bock and Craig A. Blaising, “Conclusion,” in Dispensationalism, Israel and the Church (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1992), 383-84 (377-94).

[6] Bock and Blaising, “Conclusion,” 392.

[7] Cf. John Gager, Reinventing Paul (Oxford: OUP, 2000); Eung Chun Park, Either Jew or Gentile: Paul’s Unfolding Theology of Inclusivity (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2003).

[8] John Gager, The Origins of Anti-Semitism (New York: OUP, 1983), 228.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



July 4, 2011

Joker One and The Fourth of July

Next Post



July 6, 2011 Bonhoeffer on the Practice of Spiritual Disciplines


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Lands Blogosphere Book Review Calvinism Colleges & Universities Ecclesiology Emerging Adulthood Evangelicalism Foreign Affairs Gospel of John Greco-Roman World Humor Just War N. T. Wright Old Testament Resurrection Terrorism Theological Education Travel Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 January 2011




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The armor of God includes the belt of truth and the breastplate of fortitude.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Books by This Author Books by Mike Bird

See All Titles »

Related posts from Euangelion

Evangelical

Rom 3:21-26 - Translates, Paraphrase, Notes

Euangelion

Evangelical

Studying the New Testament through Inscriptions

Euangelion

Evangelical

Is Paul's Christ an Angel?

Euangelion

Evangelical

Romans 13:1-7 - Translates, Paraphrase, and Notes

Euangelion

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube