Jesus and the Eucharist 5

Last updated on: June 11, 2011 at 8:36 pm by Joel Willitts

Jesus and the Eucharist 5 2011-06-11T20:36:01-04:00 Joel Willitts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Awhile back, before the end of the academic semester and a trip to Greece and Turkey, I began a series of posts working my way through Brant Pitre’s really good and accessible book on the Jewish background of the Lord’s Supper called Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist: Unlocking the Secrets of the Last Supper (you can find these at our old blogspot site). This posts picks up where we left off with chapter four “The Manna of the Messiah”. This chapter is the heart of the book. Brant says at one point that subject of the chapter “led me to study this subject, and ultimately, to write this book” (93).

The Jewish expectation of a new manna from heaven at the inauguration of the Messianic Age, is the second key to fully grasping the meaning of the Lord’s Supper. Jesus drew on this expectation, according to Brant, to explain the supernatural nature of the Eucharist. Before we get to Jesus let’s briefly review the Jewish expectation.

The giving of manna is recorded in the Old Testament in the book of Exodus. You will remember that God gave “manna”, which means, “What is it?”, to the Israelites while they wandered in the wilderness until they entered the Promised Land. In fact upon entering the Promised Land the manna stopped falling. Brant uncovers the evidence showing that ancient Jews did not forget the manna. Within the literature of the Second Temple period the manna is referenced many times. Brant highlights three traditions that revolve around the bread from heaven which he believes shed light on Jesus’ thoughts about the Lord’s Supper. The three traditions he lists are: (1) some Jews believed the manna was preexistent, (2) that it was supernatural reality kept in the heavenly temple to feed God’s people, and (3) that at the appearance of the Messiah manna would again fall from heaven to sustain God’s people.

The relationship between these Jewish traditions and Jesus’ teachings, Brant brings out in clear bold strokes. First, he explains the line in the Lord’s Prayer, “Give us this day our daily bread” in line with the tradition. He believes it is better translated “Give us this day our supernatural bread”, translating the difficult Greek word epiousios following ancient fathers like Jerome. Here in the context of a prayer for the Kingdom of God to come, Jesus teaches the disciples to pray for the new manna which would accompany its coming. This is quite an interesting interpretation and I’m inclined to be sympathetic to it.

More significantly is the second touchstone with the teachings of Jesus, the so-called “bread of heaven” sermon recorded in John 6. This passage Brant believes contains Jesus’ most explicit teaching on the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist. It is fair to say that Brant’s book rests largely on his interpretation of Jesus’ statements here. He in fact quoted the key verses of the passage in the introduction of the book: “unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you” (John 6:53).

What is foremost, irrespective of the interpretation of the words in light of the new Manna traditions, is whether this discourse can rightly be seen as Jesus’ “explicit teaching on the real presence in the Eucharist” and justifiably be referred to as the “Eucharist discourse”—both Brant does. He states,

“In light of such parallels . . . any attempt to insist that Jesus was not speaking about what he would do at the Last Supper here is a weak case of special pleading” (101).

Wow! That is about as explicit a case one could find of attempting to shout so loud through writing so as to silence potential critics. The problems with his interpretation however are not so easy to silence and to make this kind of statement seems itself an egregious example of “special pleading”. As many have pointed out, John is remarkably the only Gospel that contains no Lord’s Supper story. And to top this, John makes no mention of the Lord’s Supper in the context of the discourse in chapter 6. The inexact parallels noted by Brant (in agreement with Jeremias) cannot settle the question.

The fact is the statements of Jesus in John 6, while perhaps usefully informed by the new manna traditions within Judaism, may very well not be about the Eucharist at all. I’m not the only one that thinks this way either. Brant can line up all the Protestants he wants, but his Catholic convictions are evidently refracting his vision so the Eucharist seems obvious in this text.

I will say this though: if I was Catholic and I thought that John 6 was about the Eucharist, Brant’s explanation would be amazing!

The chapter is interesting indeed. I think the background of the new Manna of Messiah is significant for interpreting Jesus’ teaching. I think it makes good sense of the Lord’s Prayer’s petition about bread. But of the much more consequential point for the book, the interpretation of John 6, I am just not convinced.

How do you read Jesus’ statements in John 6?

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 11, 2011

Things to Note

Next Post

June 12, 2011 Eerdmans Books on Judaism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Lands Blogosphere Book Review Calvinism Colleges & Universities Ecclesiology Emerging Adulthood Evangelicalism Foreign Affairs Gospel of John Greco-Roman World Humor Just War N. T. Wright Old Testament Resurrection Terrorism Theological Education Travel Uncategorized Writing

Select a Month September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 January 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is called the "brother of the Lord" and wrote a New Testament letter?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bartholomew John James Titus

Books by This Author Books by Mike Bird

See All Titles »