Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

equalityforhappiness

99% of Interfaith Marriage Bans Found in Muslim Nations

Last updated on: July 27, 2025 at 12:44 pm   by Dr. Dilip Amin

0 Comments

99% of Interfaith Marriage Bans Found in Muslim Nations 2025-07-27T12:44:49-07:00 Dr. Dilip Amin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Using freedom of interfaith marriage as an indicator of religious pluralism, this study reveals that 99% of legal restrictions on interfaith unions are imposed by Islamic countries. Specifically, 32 out of 53 Muslim-majority countries (60.4%) enforce Sharia-based legal restrictions that prevent Muslims from marrying outside their faith. These laws impact an estimated 1.11 billion Muslims.

In contrast, only one Christian-majority country (out of 122; Vatican City), one Jewish-majority country (Israel), and none of the 14 Dharmic-majority countries have comparable constitutional or legal restrictions on interfaith marriage.

Number of people covered under restrictions on interfaith marriages. Photo: Dilip Amin.

While religious institutions may set internal guidelines for their members (e.g., churches or mosques), and communities or individuals may choose to follow religious guidance voluntarily, these situations differ fundamentally from a nation codifying religious doctrines into its legal system.

This study focuses exclusively on state-imposed legal restrictions on interfaith marriage to understand the pluralistic mindset of their majority population.

High-Level New Findings

Data from Hiddush and Houssain Kettani were merged and analyzed to evaluate restrictions on interfaith marriage (IFM) imposed by various countries on the majority of their citizens.

Key Findings:

People under restriction for interfaith marriages around the world are presented in millions (left) and as percent of total people under restrictions (right). This includes 1,113 million Muslims (99.4% of total, from 32 countries), 6.8 million Jews (0.6% of total, Israel) and 528 Christians (one Vatican City State out of 122 Christian majority countries). All Dharmic (14 countries) majority countries have provided freedom of IFM to their citizens. These data were generated using data provided by Hiddush.org and Houssain Kettani.

There are 53 countries with Muslims as a majority population, of which 32 (60.4%) countries have severe restrictions on interfaith marriages. 1,566 million Muslims live in those 53 countries (84.8% Muslims), of which 1,113 million Muslims (71.1%) have severe restrictions on IFM. There are 21 Muslim majority countries (39.6% of countries with Muslim majority) who provide full freedom of IFM to their citizens. It covers 453 million Muslims (28.9% of all Muslims in these 53 countries). These data were generated using data provided by Hiddush.org and Houssain Kettani.

Note: This survey focuses solely on state-imposed legal restrictions. It does not address internal religious or community practices. For example:

These are voluntary or institutional choices—not national legal mandates—and are therefore excluded from this analysis.

Source of Data

The analysis in this study is based on two primary sources:

  1. Hiddush – We used the downloadable dataset provided by Hiddush on global Freedom of Marriage. To avoid introducing any personal or interpretive bias, we relied strictly on the descriptions and classifications provided by Hiddush, without altering or reinterpreting their criteria.
  2. Houssain Kettani – Population data was drawn from Kettani’s demographic work, primarily using figures from 2020 or the closest available year. In keeping with our goal of neutrality, we deliberately avoided using more recent population estimates selectively for specific countries.

In a few instances, additional data sources were used to fill specific gaps. These instances are individually cited where applicable.

Method of Data Analysis

The author utilized the Hiddush dataset to evaluate global restrictions on freedom of interfaith marriage and merged it with population data from Houssain Kettani for demographic analysis.

From Hiddush’s broader category of “restrictions on marriage,” we excluded non-relevant factors such as:

We retained only those countries that explicitly impose legal restrictions on interfaith marriage.

Example – Ghana

Ghana is a Christian-majority country, but its Muslim minority may be subject to Sharia-based marriage laws, potentially limiting their freedom of IFM. However, for the purposes of this study, Ghana was categorized as Category 2 (Freedom of IFM) because our methodology is based solely on the legal freedom available to the majority population of a country.

This approach implies that the actual number of Muslims globally under IFM restrictions is higher than the 1.11 billion estimated. However, due to a lack of reliable quantitative data on populations governed by Sharia law in non-Muslim-majority nations, further analysis on this subset was not pursued.

Example – Israel

In Israel, only religious weddings conducted under Orthodox Jewish law are officially recognized for the majority Jewish population. However, the Ministry of Interior accepts civil marriages performed abroad, providing a relatively accessible workaround. Technically, Israel may fall under Category 1 (Restrictions), but for the sake of consistency and simplicity, we have categorized Israel as Category 0 (Severe Restrictions) throughout most of this report.

Why There Is a Need to Generate This Information

There are two primary reasons motivating this analysis:

  1. Evaluating Claims of Religious Freedom and Pluralism

Many religious leaders, especially in interfaith forums, assert that their faith imposes no compulsion in religion (e.g., Quran 2:256) and that believers enjoy full freedom to follow—or not follow—their religion and make independent life choices. While such statements are often made in good faith, they remain subjective and difficult to verify across different cultures and legal systems.

To bring objectivity to this discussion, this study relies on measurable legal data—specifically, civil laws governing interfaith marriage—as an indicator of actual religious freedom and pluralism within a society. This approach allows for a comparative, data-driven assessment across religions.

  1. Reinterpreting Hiddush Data with a Narrower Focus

Hiddush has previously published valuable data on “Freedom of Marriage” across nations. Their scoring system (Categories 0 to 2) accounts for a broad range of issues such as Interfaith marriages, gender discrimination, underage marriage, polygamy, LGBTQ+ rights, etc.

While comprehensive, this wide scope sometimes obscures the specific issue of “Freedom in Interfaith Marriage.” To address this gap, the author reclassified Hiddush’s data with a singular focus: freedom of interfaith marriage available to the majority population of each country.

Hiddush data (left) on “severe restrictions on marriages” includes 10 Christian countries out of a total 122 countries (8.2%). The same numbers for Islam were 33/53 (62.3%). Our data (right) shows only one of Christian (out of 122, 0.8%), one of Jewish (out of one, 100%) and none Dharmic majority countries (out of 14) have any “restriction on interfaith marriages” (data on Israel not shown on the graph since it is a very small data set, n=1).

In Hiddush’s original dataset, marriage restrictions were reported in:

However, upon closer examination, it became clear that among Christian-majority countries, only the Vatican City State imposes legal restrictions on interfaith marriage. This discrepancy between general marriage restrictions and interfaith-specific restrictions necessitated the need for a new, more targeted analysis.

Example — India

According to Hiddush, India is classified under Category 1, citing issues such as underage and forced marriages, as well as caste-based discrimination. Their summary reads:

“Formal freedom of marriage. There are reports of underage marriage, many of them are forced marriages. There are reports of discrimination practiced, based on caste.”

However, for the purpose of this study, India is reclassified under Category 2 (Full Freedom) because it offers formal legal freedom of interfaith marriage to all citizens, including Muslims and other minorities.

Jewish-Majority Country (n = 1): Israel

In the Hiddush dataset, Israel—the world’s only Jewish-majority country—is classified under Category 0 (Severe Restrictions on Marriage). Hiddush provides the following explanation:

“Only recognized religious marriage ceremonies are allowed. For Jews, only weddings that are held according to strict Orthodox standards are accepted. There is no option for civil marriage or interfaith marriage. Weddings conducted outside of the country are recognized. 300,000 citizens are defined as ‘without religion’ and they are unable to get married in the country.”

In the author’s earlier 2017 publication, the legal framework in Israel was summarized as follows:

“Israeli law permits only religious marriages held by religious authorities and does not allow civil marriages. Among the Jewish population, the Chief Rabbinate—operating according to Orthodox Jewish standards—holds a monopoly over marriage. Only those recognized as Jews under Orthodox Jewish law may marry in Israel. Members of other religions may only marry within their own faith, and only through their recognized religious authority. As a result, interfaith and non-religious marriages are not permitted in Israel. However, the Ministry of Interior does register and accept civil marriages conducted abroad.”

Although these restrictions are significant, Israel does offer a practical loophole:
An Israeli in an interfaith relationship may travel abroad to marry, and upon return, can register the marriage with the Ministry of Interior. This makes it relatively straightforward for interfaith couples to gain legal marital status—despite the domestic ban.

By contrast, most Muslim-majority countries offer no such legal workaround. For example, the author previously wrote about Malaysia:

“A marriage registered under the laws of a foreign country must be re-registered at the Malaysian Representative Office within six months of the date of marriage. An interfaith couple married outside Malaysia will not be able to register their matrimonial status in Malaysia, and their children will be denied the benefit of Malaysian citizenship.”

This key difference underscores that, while Israel legally restricts interfaith marriage, the practical impact is partially mitigated by its recognition of foreign civil marriages—a privilege generally not afforded in Sharia-enforcing Muslim-majority nations.

Christian-Majority Countries (n = 122)

According to Hiddush, 10 Christian-majority countries were categorized under Category 0 (Severe Restrictions on Marriage). However, upon further examination, the author determined that only Vatican City truly imposes severe restrictions specifically on interfaith marriages. The other nine were reassessed and reclassified as Category 2 (Freedom of IFM), based on the criteria used in this analysis.

Vatican City State

Other Nine Countries Initially Labeled Category 0 by Hiddush – Reclassified as Category 2 (Freedom of IFM)

Although these countries were placed in Category 0 by Hiddush due to various social or cultural concerns (e.g., polygamy, underage marriage, discrimination against women), none of them legally prohibit interfaith marriage for the majority Christian population. Hence, they are reclassified as Category 2 for this study.

Despite these concerns, none of these countries place legal restrictions on interfaith marriage for their majority Christian populations, which justifies their reclassification under Category 2.

Hiddush Category 1 Countries – Author’s Reclassification

Hiddush placed 30 Christian-majority countries in Category 1 (Some Restrictions on Marriage) due to societal practices or religious minority laws (e.g., Sharia law applied to Muslim citizens). However, since this analysis is focused on freedom of interfaith marriage for the majority religion (Christianity), these countries are reclassified as Category 2.

Two illustrative examples:

The full list of Category 1 countries can be referenced in the Hiddush report.

Dharmic-Majority Countries (n = 14)

The 14 countries with a majority population following Dharmic faiths (Hinduism, Buddh.ism, Jainism, and Sikhism) include:

Bhutan, Cambodia, India, Japan, Laos, Mauritius, Mongolia, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam.

According to both Hiddush and this analysis, all 14 Dharmic-majority countries provide formal freedom of interfaith marriage for people of all religions. These countries are consistently categorized as Category 2 (Freedom of IFM).

To illustrate the legal framework, the following example is provided:

Marriage Laws in India

India exemplifies a pluralistic legal system that accommodates the country’s religious diversity through both personal laws and civil marriage laws.

This pluralistic approach ensures that freedom of interfaith marriage is legally protected in India, consistent with the categorizations by both Hiddush and the author.

Muslim-Majority Countries (n = 53)

Muslim-majority countries exhibit the greatest legal restrictions on interfaith marriages. Based on Hiddush and this author’s analysis, 32–33 of these 53 countries fall under Category 0 (Severe Restrictions), while only 20–21 countries have some restrictions or formal freedom for interfaith marriage.

Hiddush Category 0 – Severe Restrictions on Marriage (n = 33)

According to Hiddush, these 33 Muslim-majority countries impose severe restrictions on marriage:

Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Morocco, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Palestinian Authority, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Somaliland, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.

Differences in Categorization

The author finds that three countries—Burkina Faso, Chad, and Gambia—require reclassification, based on constitutional and legal frameworks.

Selected Country Notes (Category 0)

Category 2 – Freedom of Interfaith Marriage (n = 21)

According to Hiddush, only three countries are formally rated with freedom of marriage:

Bosnia and Herzegovina (43.8% Muslims), Kazakhstan (70.9%), and Kosovo (93.5%).

However, based on constitutional analysis, the author identifies 18 additional Muslim-majority countries with de jure freedom of IFM:

Albania, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso (see above), Chad (see above), Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.

Selected Country Notes (Category 2)

1.11 Billion Muslims: A Very Conservative Estimate

We found that 1.11 billion Muslims—55% of the world’s 2.04 billion Muslims in 2020—live in Muslim-majority countries with severe legal restrictions on interfaith marriages. However, this figure is a very conservative estimate for several reasons.

First, we excluded some Muslim-majority countries like Chad and Senegal where national laws may appear neutral, but Sharia-based practices are allowed in certain regions, effectively limiting interfaith marriages in practice.

Second, Christian-majority countries such as Congo, Ghana, Kenya, the Philippines, and Trinidad and Tobago also permit Sharia-based restrictions for Muslim minorities, which restrict their freedom of interfaith marriage.

Third, Bangladesh is a country where the constitution does not prohibit interfaith marriages, yet in practice, not a single Hindu-Muslim married couple can be found, as the majority community is socially and culturally intolerant of such unions.

Fourth, in India, Muslims technically have the freedom to marry under secular law, but most Muslims prefer registering their marriages under the Sharia-based Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937, which prohibits interfaith unions unless the non-Muslim converts.

Collectively, considering multiple factors, Muslims under severe restrictions for interfaith marriage are far more than projected in this report.

Interfaith Marriages as a Marker of Pluralism

Many religious leaders proudly assert that their faith is pluralistic—respecting other religions and their practices. However, such claims are often difficult to quantify or compare across traditions. One meaningful and measurable test of true pluralism, the author argues, is the approach to interfaith marriage.

A genuinely pluralistic interfaith union should be based on Sharing and Respect with Equality—where both partners are free to retain and practice their respective faiths equally (ideally 50–50%). In contrast, exclusivist traditions often require the partner from another faith to convert or abandon their own religion. These traditions may also discourage, or even prohibit, the practice of both faiths within a single household.

Furthermore, in countries where exclusivist supremacist ideologies dominate, civil or religious laws are often structured to restrict or suppress interfaith marriages altogether. The findings of this research project offer a rare quantitative comparison across religions—revealing how different traditions actually perform, in practice, when it comes to pluralism in the context of interfaith unions.

Scriptures and Interfaith Marriages

All religious scriptures contain some exclusivist statements—or are often interpreted that way by followers or critics. This can be seen in the Quran, Bible, Torah, Bar Mitzvah and even sometimes in texts like the Gita.

In contrast, Dharmic traditions—such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism—generally do not contain explicit prohibitions against interfaith marriage. These are non-proselytizing religions and do not have a practice of religious conversion as a condition for marriage. Interfaith couples within Dharmic traditions (e.g., Hindu-Buddhist or Jain-Sikh) often retain and respect both faiths, practicing them to varying degrees within the family. The author uses this as a true marker of pluralism.

Torah, Bible and Bar Mitzvah

“Nor shall you make marriages with them. You shall not give your daughter to their son, nor take their daughter for your son.” (Deuteronomy 7:3)

“You shall not intermarry with them.” (I Kings 11:2)

“Do not give your daughters as wives for their sons, nor take their daughters to your sons; and never seek their peace or prosperity.” (Ezra 9:12)

“We would not give our daughters as wives to the peoples of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons.” (Nehemiah 10:30, 13:25)

“Judah has been unfaithful… marrying women who worship a foreign god.” (Malachi 2:11).

“She is at liberty to be married to whom she wishes, but he must belong to the Lord.” (I Corinthians 7:39)

“Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers.” (II Corinthians 6:14)

“Not to marry non-Jews.” (Bar Mitzvah: 162)

Quran

Quran 2:221: “You shall not wed a pagan women, unless they embrace the Faith. A believing slave-girl is better than an idolatress, although she may please you. Nor shall you wed idolaters, unless they embrace the Faith. A believing slave is better than an idolater, although he may please you.”

Quran 60:11 “Do not maintain your marriages with unbelieving women.” (The Koran, N. J. Dawood, Penguin Books, 2003)

Sharia Laws on Interfaith Marriages

Source of this section on Sharia: ChatGPT, OpenAI. Response generated on July 16, 2025, based on Quranic verses (2:221, 5:5, 60:10) and classical Islamic jurisprudence.

Sharia (Islamic law) addresses interfaith marriages in detail, with different rules for men and women. These rules are derived primarily from the Quran, Hadith (Prophet Muhammad’s sayings), and classical Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). Here’s a summary:

  1. Muslim Man Marrying a Non-Muslim Woman

Permitted with restrictions:

Note: In practice, this is often discouraged in traditional Muslim societies due to concerns about children’s religious upbringing.

  1. Muslim Woman Marrying a Non-Muslim Man

Strictly prohibited in classical Sharia:

This is the most restrictive and inflexible rule regarding interfaith marriages in Islam.

  1. Marriage Ceremony
  1. Children in Interfaith Marriages

Modern Variations

Summary of Sharia Rules:

Author: Abrahamic scriptures are often interpreted by some as exclusivist and opposing interfaith marriages. However, others—including pluralist scholars—offer more inclusive interpretations. For example, some Muslims interpret Quran 2:221 in ways that support interfaith marriages.

While scriptures themselves are fixed texts, our understanding of them can evolve. What matters today is how we interpret these teachings in ways that are relevant, compassionate, and inclusive for contemporary society.

Christianity versus Islam

Christianity and Islam are both proselytizing religions and, historically, have been responsible for large-scale violence committed in the name of God—arguably more so than any other faiths. Despite this shared past, there is a stark difference today in how these religions handle interfaith marriages. All Christian-majority countries—except the Vatican, a unique church-state—have no legal restrictions on interfaith marriage. In contrast, about 60% of Muslim-majority countries maintain such restrictions.

To illustrate the scale of this difference:

This raises an important question: Why such a stark difference today, even though both religions contain relatively similar scriptural guidance?

The author believes the key distinction lies in the relationship between religion and the state. Over time, Christian-majority societies have largely managed to separate Church and State. This allows the majority of citizens to make personal decisions—such as whom to marry—without religious interference.

In contrast, in most Islamic countries, religion and governance remain closely intertwined. The classical Islamic view holds that the head of a Muslim state must be Muslim. While this view is widely accepted, it is not explicitly stated in the Quran. The closest verses often cited are:

There is also no hadith that directly prohibits non-Muslims from being political leaders over Muslims. However, a widely cited hadith says: “The leaders (Imams) should be from among the Quraysh” (Sahih Muslim), which has been interpreted by some as a precedent for Muslim-only leadership.

Despite the absence of explicit textual prohibitions, the theocratic model still prevails in most Muslim-majority nations. In such systems, religious authorities play a dominant role in both governance and personal law (examples: Iran, Malaysia). It is in the interest of these authorities to restrict interfaith marriages, as such restrictions effectively require the non-Muslim partner to convert to Islam—thus increasing the Muslim demographic.

It appears that large segments of the Muslim community remain complicit with this status quo, either through passive acceptance or active support.

Author’s Reflections

Restrictions on interfaith marriages are imposed almost exclusively by Muslim-majority nations. Israel, a Jewish state, has similar limitations, but it allows certain legal loopholes—such as civil marriages abroad—that provide some relief for interfaith couples. Vatican City, the only Christian theocratic state, has a population of just 528, composed primarily of church officials. In contrast, no Dharmic-majority nation has imposed restrictions on IFM.

In today’s increasingly interconnected world, people travel widely for work and education, and form new relationships through social media and global networks. As a result, approximately 40% of people from all religions now marry outside their faith. In the United States, the author has found that 38% of Dharmic individuals marry Abrahamic partners, and 45% of Muslims marry outside their faith. Interfaith relationships are growing rapidly and are projected to rise even faster in the coming decades.

While statistics are available on interfaith marriages, little is known about the number of people who attempted but failed in interfaith relationships. Having personally guided over 1,300 interfaith dating individuals, the author has observed that most face significant emotional distress and hardship—often unprepared for the institutional, societal, and legal barriers that arise. These struggles, including failed relationships, affect a growing number of youth and will have increasing social implications in the future.

Individuals have the right to choose a conservative or liberal religious outlook for their personal life, and such choices must be respected as long as they do not harm others. However, the issue becomes more complex when a nation imposes a religious (or anti-religious, as seen in China) ideology on its citizens. In interfaith relationships, restrictive laws disproportionately burden the minority-faith partner. When legal constraints favor the majority religion, the minority partner is often left with only two painful choices:

  1. abandon the relationship, or
  2. undergo a forced or fake conversion simply to comply with national law.

A third option—emigrating and marrying abroad—is rarely practical or affordable for most.

When enacting strict laws against IFM, Islamic countries (and Israel) may have considered the demographic advantage such laws create: by coercing conversion, they effectively expand the majority religious population. From a self-serving perspective, the majority faith loses nothing and potentially gains followers. It is, therefore, surprising that Christian and Dharmic-majority nations have not adopted similar strategies if viewed purely through a selfish and demographic lens.

If freedom of interfaith marriage is seen as a hallmark of pluralism and social progress, then most Islamic countries (and Israel) fall short. The author sees little hope for significant reform in these societies anytime soon.

Ironically, to be consistent, Islamic (and Jewish) states that enforce strict IFM laws should also prohibit interfaith dating among their majority populations, in line with the spirit of Quran 24:30, which discourages romantic or sexual relations outside marriage. Some countries like Malaysia enforce this through harsh khalwat or zina laws (fornication), with punishments including public caning. However, most Islamic countries and Israel do not penalize interfaith dating in the same way they regulate interfaith marriages. This inconsistency leaves minority partners vulnerable and unprotected.

A Suggestion to Interfaith Dating Youth

For those in interfaith relationships, it’s important to recognize that personal love can sometimes come into conflict with national laws and religious restrictions—especially in countries or communities that outright oppose interfaith marriage.

If your partner comes from a faith or country where interfaith marriages face legal or severe social barriers, this may one day affect your future together in significant ways. Such restrictions are difficult, if not impossible, to overcome at the individual level.

Out of care for your own well-being and long-term happiness, it may be wise to thoughtfully re-evaluate your relationship and consider these realities before moving forward.

Read Authors similar other articles:

Muslim-Hindu Marriages

Zohran Mamdani: NYC Mayor Hopeful with Interfaith Roots (Zoran is Muslim, never claimed to be a Hindu–his mother’s faith)

Hindu-Muslim Marriages: When Gandhi and Mohammed Meet (stereotypes in Hindu-Muslim marriages)

Legal Implications in Interfaith Marriages

Myth: I Converted by My Choice for Interfaith Marriage (Fake conversions)

Conversion for Marriage

End of Interfaith Marriages in Indonesia

The Status of Hindus in Malaysia: A Travelogue

Official Position of Sunni Muslims in America about Interfaith Marriages

Sharia in Interfaith Marriages (video)

Hindu-Muslim Marriages (video)

Interfaith Marriage: Share and Respect with Equality (Author’s book; in Malayalam)

Hindu-Muslim Marriage (Author’s book; in Hindi)

Muslim

Jewish

Relationships and Religion

Hindu-Muslim marriage

Uncategorized

Christianity

Hinduism

interfaith marriage

Islam

Laws

Pluralism

About Dr. Dilip Amin

Dr. Dilip Amin is the founder of Interfaithshaadi.org and HinduSpeakers.org. Dr. Amin is Director of the Peninsula Multifaith Coalition of the San Francisco Bay area. He is a Dharma Ambassador and on the Advisory Committee at the Hindu American Foundation. He is a jail chaplain and a Columnist at Patheos. He is a faculty member at Hindu University of America. Dr. Amin has guided 1300 youth in interfaith relationships over the past 19 years and has summarized his experiences in several books: Hindu Vivaha Samskara, Interfaith Marriage-Share & Respect with Equality (also published in Malayalam) and Hindu-Muslim Marriage: Difficulties and Reconciliations (also in Hindi). You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post



June 30, 2025

Myth: I Converted by My Choice for Interfaith Marriage

Next Post



November 4, 2025 Will Usha Chilukuri Convert to the Faith of JD Vance?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Dear KarolD, Please view my latest video. Please comment on Youtube. I hope to hear ..."

InterfaithShaadi-org

Will Usha Chilukuri Convert to the ..."

"Watch mistakes of Usha Chilukuri... https://youtu.be/LGD4dzRW21o"

InterfaithShaadi-org

Will Usha Chilukuri Convert to the ..."

"Putting public pressure on a spouse to convert or change any aspect of her identity, ..."

KarolD

Will Usha Chilukuri Convert to the ..."

"But whether or not his wife converts should not be part of politics.And shouldn't be ..."

KarolD

Will Usha Chilukuri Convert to the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Hindu-Christian Marriage Hindu-Jew Marriage Hindu-Muslim marriage Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 February 2026 December 2025 November 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 February 2025 October 2024 July 2024 June 2024 April 2024 April 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022

Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What color is the first horse in Revelation 6?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Black Red Pale White

Books by This Author Books by Equality For Happiness

See All Titles »

Related posts from Equality For Happiness

Hindu

10% or 38%? Counting Hindu - American Interfaith...

Equality For Happiness

Hindu

20 Questions to Ask Before an Interfaith Marriage,...

Equality For Happiness

Hindu

A Valentine’s Day Message for Dating Couples

Equality For Happiness

Hindu

Can Kids Be Raised in Two Faiths? A...

Equality For Happiness

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Family, Parenting and Religion

10% or 38%? Counting Hindu - American Interfaith...

Are 10% or 38% of American Hindus Marrying Outside Faith? What two...

Indian Hindu pilot’s valor in line of duty...

  There is a hoary maritime tradition that the captain of the...

Movie on Neem Karoli Baba’s life is a...

Neem Karoli Baba’s life (1900-1973) is associated with miracles he made in...

20 Questions to Ask Before an Interfaith Marriage,...

Four questions every interfaith couple should discuss before marriage: Conversion. Will either...

Avadhānam: The Art of Concentration and Intellectual Mastery

What is Avadhānam? In the summer of 2015, during a three-day Sanskrit...

Jesus in the Dharma: Where Christ Fits in...

Where Does Jesus Fit in Hinduism? That’s a question I get often...

view all Family, Parenting and Religion blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube