Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Epiphenom

Home
About

Home
Nonreligious
Do you wanna be in my clan? Moralising gods encourage long-distance sharing with co-religionists

Do you wanna be in my clan? Moralising gods encourage long-distance sharing with co-religionists

Last updated on: February 11, 2016 at 11:36 pm by Epiphenom

Do you wanna be in my clan? Moralising gods encourage long-distance sharing with co-religionists 2016-02-11T23:36:10+01:00 Epiphenom

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Most gods that have been invented don’t give a damn about what us mortals get up to. Researchers think that belief in the few that do, the ones that can be thought of as moralising gods, might have a significant effect on behaviour.

For example, more complex societies are more likely to believe in moralising gods (When did Moralizing Gods Emerge?), and people living societies in which there is a level of belief in ‘world religions’ like Christianity and Buddhism are more willing to share money with strangers (Did World Religions Help Bring About Complex Societies?).

Now, a team of scientists that reads like a ‘Who’s Who’ of experts in the anthropology of belief in moralising gods has come together to perform a sophisticated international study in a wide variety of world cultures. You can see the locations of the cultures they studied on the map below.

These societies span the range from hunter-gatherers through herders, farmers, to wage-labour economies. What they all have in common is that they mix belief in a moralising religion (Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, and a couple of local gods) with a wide variety of non-moralising spirits, gods and ghosts.

In each of these societies, they asked the locals to play a game. One that tested their honesty in dealing with anonymous strangers.

Basically, they were given thirty coins and two cups. In one version of the game, they were told that they could keep whatever money went into the first cup, and that whatever went into the second cup went to a co-religionist living in a neighbouring community.

They had to mentally choose a cup, and then roll a die that had just two colours. If the die came up red, then they had to put the coin in the cup they secretly chose. If it came up blue, then they had to put it in the opposite cup.

The second version of the game was just the same, except all the money in the first cup went to a co-religionist in their community.

Now, if you think about it, if all the participants were honest then the money should have been distributed equally between he two cups. After all, it’s just down to the roll of a die. But of course that’s not what happened.

In fact, they lied. They tended to put more money in the first cup – the proceeds of which went to themselves or people from their own community.

However, those who believed in a punishing god were more likely to be honest. In fact, as you can see in the graph below, these people nearly reached magic number of 15 coins donated to distant co-religionists (which would’ve indicated full honesty).

Now, the effect is not huge. But it is there, and it is statistically significant.

They ran their data through a model that controlled for a bunch of variables, like material insecurity, number of children and also beliefs about the local gods (whether they are all-knowing and/or punishing). But the findings were pretty robust.

What this suggests is that people are indeed more likely to give to co-religionists, even when they are geographically remote. That supports other research suggesting that religion encourages people to see their co-religionists as part of their own tribe (see: the hand grenade experiment, for example).

However, when they tried subliminally priming their subjects with ideas about moralising gods, it had no effect on their behaviour. So it’s not altogether clear whether their belief is a cause of their behaviour, or simply a product of it.

What’s more, other research that has been done into the timing of the emergence of moralising gods has tended to show that they come about after the emergence of complex societies (see: Wealth and Enlightenment in the Ancient World and Did Belief in Ghosts Help Kick-Start Civilisation?).

So does belief in moralising gods help to create and sustain complex societies? Well, it certainly seems that it can change behaviour towards co-religionists, making them feel like part of your tribe – even if that effect is small. But it’s also clear that the emergence of moralising gods is something that has played a kind of waltz with civilisations – being constantly adapted in response to changing social needs.

Cause or effect? Perhaps we’ll never know.

Purzycki, B., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q., Cohen, E., McNamara, R., Willard, A., Xygalatas, D., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2016). Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality Nature DOI: 10.1038/nature16980

Effects of religion - social

Civilization

Moralising gods

Previous Post

February 4, 2016

The decline of religion in Europe did not lead to a decline in moral standards

Next Post

February 19, 2016 Use of prayer by African-Americans can help explain why they are more sensitive to pain

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Causes of religion - evolution Causes of religion - psychological Causes of religion - social Demographics Digest Effects of religion - health Effects of religion - psychological Effects of religion - social Notifications Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the youngest king of Judah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hezekiah Asa Josiah Jehoshaphat