Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Epiphenom

When you think about spirits, do you see ghosts?

Last updated on: November 26, 2014 at 10:37 pm   by Epiphenom

When you think about spirits, do you see ghosts? 2014-11-26T22:37:59+01:00 Epiphenom

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Humans are finely honed for spotting intentional agents in our environment. Meaning that if you hear a rustling, or see a branch move, you’re instantly on the alert in case it is another person (this effect is has a name: ‘hyperactive agency detection’).

You can see why evolution would have favoured that. Better safe than sorry, right? The result is that it’s not uncommon to see humans when there’s nothing really there. Ghosts, anyone?

But not all humans are equally sensitive to that effect. Even more intriguingly, there’s good evidence that you can manipulate the sensitivity – for example by making people feel they are not in control of events.

Michiel van Elk (University of Amsterdam) previously found that paranormal believers were more prone to see human figures walking in a random cloud of dots. In his latest set of studies, he wanted to know whether subliminal primes about the supernatural can make people prone to this illusion.

First he ran a couple of studies on local students using a similar moving dots task.There were lots of different patterns – some clearly figures walking, some just dots, but most were somewhere between the two. They had to say whether or not they saw a figure walking.

Before viewing the dots, they were shown a word that either had supernatural connotations (god, ghost, spirit, ghoul, etc), or was an animal or human (lawyer, clown, dentist etc).

There was no detectable effect of these different words on what they saw. The students were no more likely to imagine they had seen a figure walking if they had thoughts of the supernatural implanted in their minds.

van_Elk2013_supernatural_prime_ghostThen he ran three studies that were similar in set-up but where the subjects had to decide if a picture showed a human face or a house – with varying degrees of blurriness. The first two were similar to the earlier studies, but the third ramped things up a bit by asking the subjects to think harder about the supernatural or human beings by asking to describe their traits).

Still no effect.

On the face of it, this shows fairly clearly that simply priming people to think about the supernatural does not lead them to see human figures in noisy images. It does not pump up their hyperactive agency detection.

There was a wrinkle. Some of the subjects were religious, and in three of the five studies people who were more religious on at least one measure of religiousness (e.g. how strongly they believe, or how often they went to church) were more likely to see ghosts after seeing the supernatural prime.

Except. Well, the following is a big ‘except’ that is a fairly common problem with psychology studies, and it goes by the name of multiple comparison testing.

When the researchers put all the data from all the studies together, there was no effect of religion. That’s because in some studies the believers, but not the churchgoers, showed the effect. In others, it was the other way round.

So what we’re seeing here is probably just blind chance at work. If you cut the data up enough and look at it in enough different ways, your bound to find something that looks unusual (or is ‘significant’, in scientific parlance).

Interestingly enough, the human primes (lawyer, clown…) did trigger this hyperactive agency detection. So we know the experimental method works.

It’s just that simply thinking about ghosts is not enough to make you see them. Ghosts stories, on the other hand…


ResearchBlogging.org

van Elk, M., Rutjens, B., van der Pligt, J., & van Harreveld, F. (2014). Priming of supernatural agent concepts and agency detection Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1-30 DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2014.933444

Creative Commons License This article by Tom Rees was first published on Epiphenom. It is licensed under Creative Commons.

Causes of religion - psychological

Hyperactive agency detection

Priming

Previous Post



November 19, 2014

Religious and paranormal believers are high in empathy - but confused about how the world works

Next Post



December 8, 2014 Can religion reduce crime?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Causes of religion - evolution Causes of religion - psychological Causes of religion - social Demographics Digest Effects of religion - health Effects of religion - psychological Effects of religion - social Notifications Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I went uninvited before the king, risking death, saying 'If I perish, I perish.' Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Vashti Deborah Esther Ruth

Related posts from Epiphenom

Nonreligious

Dogmatic atheism and fundamentalist Christianity: creating certainty in...

Epiphenom

Nonreligious

Religion linked to reduced levels of stress hormones...

Epiphenom

Nonreligious

A sense of mystery results from the brain...

Epiphenom

Nonreligious

Reminding people of mortality makes them more religious?...

Epiphenom

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube