Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Epiphenom

Religious and paranormal believers are high in empathy – but confused about how the world works

Last updated on: November 19, 2014 at 9:43 pm   by Epiphenom

Religious and paranormal believers are high in empathy – but confused about how the world works 2014-11-19T21:43:37+01:00 Epiphenom

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There’s a strand of thought that says that belief in the supernatural is founded upon a misunderstanding of how the world works (see: You either believe in it all, or you don’t).

On the other hand, there’s another perspective that says the cognitive problem is with the atheists. Belief in gods, according to this school of thought, is basically an extension of our ability to ‘mentalise’ – or get inside the heads of other people (see: Atheists lack empathy and understanding).

To settle this, Marjaana Lindeman and colleagues from the University of Helsinki subjected nearly 2,800 Finns (roughly half and half Christians and non-believers) to a battery of online questionnaires. These included tests of their ability to recognize emotions depicted in photographs of actors, and their ability to think clearly about the world.

It’s worth spelling out how they tested ability to think clearly. The first test was around something called teleological bias. This happens when people habitually think in terms of things existing or happening for a purpose, even though logically they do not. For example, agreeing with the statement “Earthworms tunnel underground to aerate the soil”.

The other was ‘core knowledge’ confusion. Basically this involves confusing metaphors with reality – for example thinking that when someone says “A house knows its history” they mean it literally does!

Lindeman and colleagues ran all this data through a structural equation model (which is a way of seeing how all the different measurements relate to each other statistically, and teasing out causal relationships) to see whether they predicted religious beliefs, paranormal beliefs, or a more general belief that life events happen for a purpose.

What they found was that thinking ability (especially core knowledge) was strongly related to a lack of religious and paranormal belief, and also a lack of belief of an underlying purpose for life events. That’s what the line in the graphic show. The numbers next to each line show how strong the connection is.

Empathic ability was only weakly correlated. In particular, inability to read emotions in the eyes (associated with autism) had no connection with either thinking ability or beliefs.

Lindeman_2014_hyper-empathising

However, there’s also been speculation that maybe the two types of thinking interact. Maybe, the suggestion is, it’s the combination of strong empathic and mentalizing skills with weak thinking ability that leads to religious and paranormal beliefs.

They found that is indeed the case.

They looked at those who they called hyper-empathising – scoring high on empathy but low on ability to pick out structural details in the world around them. So they asked questions about whether or not their subjects notice details such as how furniture in the room is constructed, or can easily navigate in their mind round their local roads and motorways.

These people, the hyper-empathic, were strongly more religious. Lindeman and colleagues comment:

The results imply that individuals with high self-reported empathy and interest in people, coupled with poor self-reported understanding of physical causality and low interest in technical, motor, abstract, and organizable systems, had more supernatural beliefs than others.

So does science confirm the stereotype here, at least?


ResearchBlogging.orgLindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A., & Lipsanen, J. (2015). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose Cognition, 134, 63-76 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008

Creative Commons License This article by Tom Rees was first published on Epiphenom. It is licensed under Creative Commons.

Causes of religion - psychological

Empathy

Ontology

Teleology

Previous Post



November 13, 2014

Hard times, tough gods

Next Post



November 26, 2014 When you think about spirits, do you see ghosts?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Causes of religion - evolution Causes of religion - psychological Causes of religion - social Demographics Digest Effects of religion - health Effects of religion - psychological Effects of religion - social Notifications Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Vanity of vanities! Everything is fleeting and meaningless. Where is this pessimistic proclamation found?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ecclesiastes Psalms Proverbs Job

Related posts from Epiphenom

Nonreligious

Dogmatic atheism and fundamentalist Christianity: creating certainty in...

Epiphenom

Nonreligious

Religion linked to reduced levels of stress hormones...

Epiphenom

Nonreligious

A sense of mystery results from the brain...

Epiphenom

Nonreligious

Reminding people of mortality makes them more religious?...

Epiphenom

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube