Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Epiphenom

Home
About

Home
Nonreligious
It hurts! Atheists and Christians don’t feel each others pain, but with a twist.

It hurts! Atheists and Christians don’t feel each others pain, but with a twist.

Last updated on: November 11, 2014 at 8:18 pm by Epiphenom

It hurts! Atheists and Christians don’t feel each others pain, but with a twist. 2014-11-11T20:18:22+01:00 Epiphenom

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Christians and atheist faces in pain

For many people, their religion is like a badge of social identity. You feel an affinity with people who share a religion – not surprising given that you will share many cultural and social touch points.

But will you feel their pain? If shown a picture of a Christian grimacing, will you mentally flinch? What about an atheist

Siyuan Huang & Shihui Han at Peking University, Beijing, strapped electrodes to the heads of a bunch of Christians and atheists to see how they reacted to pictures of people – Christians and atheists – in pain. To keep it balanced, they used the images of the same 10 models for both Christians and atheists. They just swapped the symbols hung round their necks for some participants.

What they found was that both Christians and atheists had an emotional reaction to the images of people in pain – but that, in both groups, the reaction was stronger for images of people from their own group.

So that’s interesting enough, but there’s a twist.

They measured the reaction at different time points. That’s what’s shown in the graph below. P2, N2 and P3 represent the magnitude of the response at different intervals – P3 is about 0.4 seconds after P2.

Neural responses to pain images

You can see that, at P2 and N2, Christians and atheists are quite similar. They have a response, but the response is greater to the ‘in-group’ – atheists respond more strongly to the images of atheists in pain, and Christians more strongly to the images of Christians in pain.

At P3 it’s quite difference. At this time point, the Christian response to atheists images virtually disappears. For atheists, remarkably, the response to christian images is as strong as the response to atheist images.

Huang and Han reckon that this is because the early responses are purely instinctive. The later response occurs after some mental and evaluation and appraisal. It reflects that the responder is applying some judgment beyond the instinctive.

Sounds like a gold star for atheists, right? I mean, instinctively they empathize less with Christians but at least after a moments reflection they share their pain.

But don’t forget that this study was done in China. In China, Christians are a decided minority whereas atheists – at least in terms of affiliation – are in the majority.

So maybe what we’re seeing here is simply that people from minority groups have a stronger in-group identity. That’s been shown in other studies – minorities tend to stick together. There’s one easy way to check this, of course, and that’s to do a similar study in a country where atheists are a minority.

But the take home from this, I think, is to be aware of just how powerful religious identity is as a component of our social identity.

Huang, S., & Han, S. (2014). Shared beliefs enhance shared feelings: Religious/irreligious identifications modulate empathic neural responses Social Neuroscience, 1-11 DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2014.934396

This article by Tom Rees was first published on Epiphenom. It is licensed under Creative Commons.

Effects of religion - psychological

Empathy

In-group favouritism

Previous Post

November 3, 2014

Best of Epiphenom 2007-2014

Next Post

November 13, 2014 Hard times, tough gods

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Causes of religion - evolution Causes of religion - psychological Causes of religion - social Demographics Digest Effects of religion - health Effects of religion - psychological Effects of religion - social Notifications Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am bread from heaven that appeared with the morning dew six days a week. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God's provision Heavenly food Manna Bread of angels