Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Epiphenom

Home
About

Home
Nonreligious
Christians have a strange affinity for Islamists – mortality salience and the response to islamic threats

Christians have a strange affinity for Islamists – mortality salience and the response to islamic threats

Last updated on: November 13, 2014 at 6:18 pm by Epiphenom

Christians have a strange affinity for Islamists – mortality salience and the response to islamic threats 2014-11-13T18:18:20+01:00 Epiphenom

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When you remind people that they’re going to die, it affects their thinking. There’s a whole field of study, Terror Management Theory, dedicated to it.

One of the things it does, so the theory goes, is trigger something called ‘cultural worldview defence’. It makes you cling to the values you are comfortable with.

It also tends to make people more religious, as Ara Norenzayan and Ian Hansen showed a couple of years ago.

Now they’re back with another study that looked at a related question: what effect does reminding people about death (they call it ‘mortality salience’) have on attitudes to foreign religions?

It could go two ways. The fear of foreigners could trigger hostility, but religious solidarity might over-ride that, even if it was a foreign religion.

So what they did was to ask their Canadian test subjects, a mix of non-religious and religious (mostly Christian, none Muslim), to rate a virulently anti-western essay, allegedly by an Islamic visiting student. Prior to doing that, they were asked to think either about dying, or watching telly (the experimenters took pains to add in a bunch of other tasks, so the subjects didn’t guess what was going on).

In the control condition, where subjects were not made to think about death and so weren’t ‘mortality salient’, there was no difference between the reactions of religious and non-religious to the essay.

And when exposed to death thoughts, the result for the non-religious was as expected. Those who were ‘mortality salient’ became more hostile to the Islamic essay.

But that didn’t happen with the religious. Their attitude didn’t change (in some experiments, they actually warmed slightly to the islamist).

They ruled out a few potential explanations. It wasn’t anything to do with political opinions or self esteem, and the groups didn’t differ in their response to the death prompt. It wasn’t that the non-religious thought more about death as a result, for example.

According to Norenzayan and Hansen, what’s going on here is that two processes are working in opposition. The religious have the same ‘fear of foreigners’ response as the non-religious, but they also are sympathetic to the religious message.

In other words, fear of death makes Christians open to the idea of the imposition of religion onto society, even when the message is coming from a foreign religion.

In case you’re curious, here’s the essay they had to rate. You can see why Christians might be strangely attracted to it, because it has a lot of ideas in it that fit snugly with Christianity.

The problem with the Western world is the lack of faith. It is for that exact reason that the West will never triumph over the Islamic world. A person with faith is by definition a stronger person than one who has nothing to look up to beyond themselves. The West has a lot to offer economically to try to fill the void in people’s hearts, but ultimately will fall behind in a true cultural war against a culture that offers conviction, offers hope for something bigger than more money or empty pleasures. Religion in the west does not offer real comfort and a true path for their believers as they do in the nations of Islam, and the important values are neglected in the West and emphasized in the Islamic world.

History shows that cultures, which offered monetary and quality of (material) life advantages at the expense of true spiritual path, eventually fell before religious passion (e.g., Greece and Rome). And we all know that history repeats itself. The signs that the wheel is starting to turn are already around us.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Norenzayan, A., Dar-Nimrod, I., Hansen, I., & Proulx, T. (2009). Mortality salience and religion: divergent effects on the defense of cultural worldviews for the religious and the non-religious European Journal of Social Psychology, 39 (1), 101-113 DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.482

This work by Tom Rees is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 18, 2009

Atheists also have a sense of awe and wonder

Next Post

June 24, 2009 The more government interferes with religion, the less satisfaction it brings you

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Causes of religion - evolution Causes of religion - psychological Causes of religion - social Demographics Digest Effects of religion - health Effects of religion - psychological Effects of religion - social Notifications Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Saul held the coats of those who stoned Stephen.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE