Scientists to do daft study on near death experiences

Last updated on: November 14, 2014 at 5:24 am by Epiphenom

Scientists to do daft study on near death experiences 2014-11-14T05:24:49+01:00 Epiphenom

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Big fanfare a few days ago: The Human Consciousness Project kicked off. This is a major initiative with some big sponsors looking to turn a scientific eye onto the brain-consciousness problem.

Their first project: the AWARE (AWAreness during REsuscitation) study, looking at brain function and conscious experiences during near-death experiences. They’re trying to match up reported experiences during near-death with brain activity – ultimately to try to figure out at what point the ‘mind’ dies. Now this is fascinating stuff, and a really interesting topic. From the news announcement, it all looks very sensible. Sadly, the guy running it, Dr Sam Parnia, has some loopy ideas about the mind. Here’s what they’re going to do:

During AWARE, investigators will place images strategically in hospital bays, such that they will only be visible by looking down from the ceiling and nowhere else.

If after 36 months, hundreds of patients report being “out of body” yet no one can report seeing the images, then we must consider these reports to be nothing more than illusions. (BBC)

Say what??? They have a major, multinational study, and they’re going to use the opportunity to see whether minds really can fly off from the body somehow and go zooming around looking at things (How? With ghost eyes?). In other words, (and heis explicit about this in his keynote lecture), it’s clear that Parnia is a subscriber to old-fashioned Cartesian dualism. This is really daft – these days not even theologians accept that crude concept of the mind.

This is not to say that the conventional wisdom that the mind is a straight product of brain cell activity (a concept that glories in the name of ‘monism’) is without challengers in the modern world. The key problem, as Susan Greenfield points out, is trying to figure out how “the water of the bump and grind of boring old brain cells somehow translated into this special wine of consciousness”.

The philosopher David Chalmers leads the field on behalf of the modern-day dualists, arguing essentially that the mind is too weird to be explained as mere physical functioning. But Chalmers most emphatically does not support he idea that the mind and the brain can be physically separated.

Parnia points out that many people report out-of-body experiences near death, and argues that “surely they can’t all be wrong”! But of course they can be! Many people are wrong about many things, especially recall. Why shouldn’t we expect recall to be particularly bad after a near-death experience? Many people report an awful lot of strange experiences on drugs, but that doesn’t mean they actually happen in reality. And that highlights a further problem with the dualist argument – if the mind is not a product of the brain, why is it that drugs which change brain chemistry can affect conscious thoughts?

In fact, out of body experiences are a classic example of monism, because they show how messing with someone’s brain can seriously affect their mind. The ‘out-of-body’ sensation can be caused by brain damage and also by drugs. And last year two studies showed that similar experiences can be generated in the lab by confusing the body’s visual and spatial sense.

Results from the AWARE study should be available in two-and-a-half years. Hopefully they will at least be the nail in the coffin of these kinds of supernatural beliefs. But I doubt it!

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 17, 2008

How to spot a religion

Next Post

September 22, 2008 Fish fingers

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Causes of religion - evolution Causes of religion - psychological Causes of religion - social Demographics Digest Effects of religion - health Effects of religion - psychological Effects of religion - social Notifications Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Melchizedek" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Priest of the Lord God's Anointed Servant of the Most High King of Righteousness