Hamblin 31: I am not a Post-Modernist

Last updated on: July 17, 2015 at 12:11 pm by William Hamblin

Hamblin 31: I am not a Post-Modernist 2015-07-17T12:11:46-07:00 William Hamblin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Jenkins repeatedly asserts that I, and all other LDS authors on the historicity of the Book of Mormon are pseudo-scholarly apologetic hacks. Every single one of us. That’s bad enough. But when he calls me a Post-Modernist, I’ve had enough. Them’s fighting words!!!!!

Jenkins claims:

**Hamblin’s point was NOT that all data involved needs to be interpreted” but rather that “**History–in the sense of the actual human past–does not exist.”

Actually, that was exactly my point–data from the Past needs to be interpreted precisely because the Past no longer exists. You’ve misunderstood me again. I would greatly appreciate it if in the future you would ask me for clarification rather than launch a completely irrelevant lengthy argument based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what I really intended to say. Maybe I was unclear, but Neal and most other people I know seem to have understood me clearly enough.

When I say that the human past does not actually exist, I mean it is gone. It is past. We can’t–despite what Terminator movies claim–go back to the past, interact with the past, change the past, directly observe the past, or experiment on the past. That does not mean that the past never existed. It clearly did. Thus there either were Nephites or there were not. On an ontological level, that is a simple straightforward issue. The epistemological level is where the difficulty lies. How can we, who are stuck in the present, understand the past, which no longer exists in our “time-space continuum” (to use the Star Trek phrase)?

The answer is that our only capacity to interact with the past is inherently indirect. We interact with the Past by studying the evidence left by past people–texts, inscriptions, art, artifacts, monuments, tools, tombs, etc. We can understand the past only by studying those things, which were made or done in the Past, but which still exist in the present. But the Past itself no longer exists; it is gone. Hence, the study of history is not empirical–that is, we cannot directly observe with our senses or experiment on the Past. History is thus a non-empirical discipline. This seems to me to be a patently obvious observation, and I suspect that you will actually agree with what I really said.

Thus, Neal has correctly understood what I said, while you have misunderstood. He correctly responds to your misunderstanding by pointing out your errors, which clearly are misrepresentations of what I actually believe and said. Thus, both Neal and I understand the real argument I’ve made. You don’t. And your accusations that Neal is misrepresenting the argument just demonstrates how much you don’t get it. Next time, if you think I’ve said something absurd, why don’t you ask for clarification? It’s easy, and I’m happy to clarify things if there are ambiguities.

Ancient Studies

Book of Mormon

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Previous Post

July 13, 2015

Jenkins 20: Does the Past Exist?

Next Post

July 17, 2015 Jenkins 20: It's all Coincidence

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ancient Studies Atheism Bible bibliography Book of Abraham Book of Mormon Book of Moses Christianity Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Deseret News Column Doctrine and Covenants Documentary Hypothesis Genesis Haram al-Sharif Historicity History Islam Israelite Religion Judaism LDS Mormon Studies Mormonism Mormons Movies Noah Penteteuch Photography Religion Temple Temple Mount Temples Third Temple Movements Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 October 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many books of the Bible are named after women?

Select your answer to see how you score.

3 1 2 4