Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Enigmatic Mirror

Hamblin 27: The Entrada of AD 378

Last updated on: July 8, 2015 at 11:37 am   by William Hamblin

Hamblin 27: The Entrada of AD 378 2015-07-08T11:37:54-07:00 William Hamblin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Book of Mormon dramatically describes a cataclysmic war which results in the desertion of many Nephites to the Lamanites, and the destruction of the Nephite polity and culture (Mormon 4-6, Moroni 9).   The traditional dates in the Book of Mormon footnotes are roughly AD 363-385.  (Assuming a 4 BC date for the birth of Christ, the actual dates may be closer to AD 360-381.)

The Book of Mormon thus predicts that the 360s and 370s were an era in Mesoamerica of major war, political disruption, and dynastic change.  How does that fit the archaeological context of Mesoamerica in the late fourth century?

One of the most famous events of the early Classic period–roughly AD 200-400, that is, coterminous with the end of the Book of Mormon–is the “Entrada” (“entrance” or “invasion”) of AD 378 by the warlord Siyaj K’ahk’.  As with most of Mesoamerican history and inscriptions, there is debate about many details of this even, including the pronunciation of Siyaj K’ahk’; his name is also given as Siyaj K’ak’, Smoking Frog, and K’ak’ Sih or K’aloomte’ (warlord).  Based on iconographic representations of Siyaj K’ahk’, it is generally assumed that he came from Teotihuacan, invaded the Maya lands, overthrew a number of cities and dynasties, and installed puppet vassal rulers in their stead.  He is mentioned  most famously in inscriptions in Tikal stele 31 (event dated to AD 378), but also in Uaxactun (inscriptions dated AD 378 and 396), Bejucal (around 381), and probably Río Azul (AD 393).  In other words, this was a major international invasion and war, with many cities submitting to his rule.  There can be little doubt that many other cities were conquered by Siyaj K’ahk’ which have left no inscriptions, or whose inscriptions have not been found.  Note that this was not the usual city-state feuding of the ancient Maya.

The Maya historical record thus broadly confirms the Book of Mormon claim of major wars and dynastic and cultural transformation in the 370s.

For more details, see David Stuart’s The Arrival of Strangers.  

Ancient Studies

Book of Mormon

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Historicity

Mormon Studies

Entrada 378

Mormon

Nephites

Philip Jenkins

Siyaj K'ahk'

Previous Post



July 8, 2015

Jenkins 19: Book of Mormon Revisited

Next Post



July 8, 2015 Hamblin 28: Homophony and Proper Names


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ancient Studies Atheism Bible bibliography Book of Abraham Book of Mormon Book of Moses Christianity Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Deseret News Column Doctrine and Covenants Documentary Hypothesis Genesis Haram al-Sharif Historicity History Islam Israelite Religion Judaism LDS Mormon Studies Mormonism Mormons Movies Noah Penteteuch Photography Religion Temple Temple Mount Temples Third Temple Movements Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 October 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

"Thou shalt not take the ___________ of the Lord thy God in vain...."

Select your answer to see how you score.

Thought Life Words Name

Related posts from Enigmatic Mirror

Latter-day Saint

Goodbye to All That

Enigmatic Mirror

Latter-day Saint

How BYU Destroyed Ancient Book of Mormon Studies

Enigmatic Mirror

Latter-day Saint

Jenkins 28: The Myth of "Therefore"

Enigmatic Mirror

Latter-day Saint

Jenkins 27: Bigfoot?

Enigmatic Mirror

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube