Jenkins Rejoinder 5: Persian Version

Last updated on: June 25, 2015 at 12:29 pm by William Hamblin

Jenkins Rejoinder 5: Persian Version 2015-06-25T12:29:05-07:00 William Hamblin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have been mulling over a debate I am having with Dr. Hamblin.

Briefly, he believes that Ancient Book of Mormon Studies (ABMS) is a real academic discipline, and I don’t. He writes, for instance, “Certainly more professional academic research work is done each year on the Book of Mormon, than, say, Old Persian studies. By any objective standard, this is a thriving and independent academic discipline.” I do now have an explanation to my puzzle, namely that he clearly has no idea what an academic discipline actually looks like.

He mentions Old Persian Studies. A few minutes of web searching turned up the following schools where Old Persian can be studied and researched, and where you can obtain an academic qualification in that subject: Harvard, Yale, Chicago, UCLA, UT Austin, Duke, Columbia, and several campuses of the University of California, including Berkeley. This does not include overseas schools such as Oxford, Cambridge, the Sorbonne, St. Andrews, SOAS… etc. My list, in other words, scratches the surface.

For comparison, here is a list of schools where Ancient Book of Mormon Studies can be studied and researched, and where you can obtain an academic qualification in that subject. I am including universities, colleges, seminaries, and higher ed institutions of all kinds, including community colleges:

…

*Cue Sound Effects*: tumbleweeds rolling, crickets chirping, mournful sound of distant harmonica, coyote howling…

Right! There aren’t any.

I can offer a similar contrast between the prestige and reputation of journals in the two respective fields, but it’s pointless. Old Persian Studies is a real academic discipline, ABMS is not. This is not difficult, honestly.

Let me say right away that on the surface, Dr. Hamblin’s statement is seemingly more nuanced, as he says he is talking about academic study of the Book of Mormon, much of which research is indeed credible, reputable and done in excellent academic settings of various kinds. That means studies of the post-1830 period, and the actual history of modern Mormonism, so technically his statement might be correct. But in the context, it is clear that he is talking about the worthless and discredited “Ancient” subset of that topic.

I apologize for using the word “discredited”. It never had any credibility to start with, so it really couldn’t lose it.

Many people might indeed work and publish each year on the ancient contexts of the Book of Mormon. None of that, though, qualifies in any sense as “professional academic research work.”

Ancient Studies

Book of Mormon

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Mormon Studies

Mormonism

Philip Jenkins

Previous Post

June 23, 2015

Jenkins Response 9: Limits of Archaeology

Next Post

June 25, 2015 Jenkins Rejoinder 6: No ABMS

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ancient Studies Atheism Bible bibliography Book of Abraham Book of Mormon Book of Moses Christianity Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Deseret News Column Doctrine and Covenants Documentary Hypothesis Genesis Haram al-Sharif Historicity History Islam Israelite Religion Judaism LDS Mormon Studies Mormonism Mormons Movies Noah Penteteuch Photography Religion Temple Temple Mount Temples Third Temple Movements Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 October 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many children did Job lose in the disasters at the beginning of the book?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ten Five Twelve Seven