Abrahamic Issues

Last updated on: July 11, 2014 at 1:28 pm by William Hamblin

Abrahamic Issues 2014-07-11T13:28:32-07:00 William Hamblin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The recent Church statement on the “Translation and Historicity of the Book of Abraham” has garnered some media attention.

KUER Radio

Washington Post

Unremarkably, the media can’t seem to understand the issues (or perhaps chooses to ignore some of them).

Here are some important things to bear in mind.

1- Everyone–LDS and non-LDS agree that the extant fragments of the JS papyri do not contain the Book of Abraham.

2- The position of most LDS scholars is either: A- the BOA once existed on the lost portions of the JS papyri, or B- the JS papyri served as a catalyst for the revelation of the BOA.

These ideas have been proposed and discussed for nearly half a century. There is nothing new about these issues in the Church statement. It contains a summary of research that has been undertaken by many scholars for decades. What is new is that the Church seems to be making an official statement on this topic, summarizing the general LDS scholarly consensus of the past few decades. (Much of this research has been sponsored by FARMS. The “new direction” of the Maxwell Institute notably seems unwilling to continue to sponsor FARMS-style Abrahamic studies.)

Some Media claims have either been misinformed, or misunderstand the following issues. The Church statement, and the recognition of the possibility that the BOA might be a translation of a lost document, in no way implies any of the following: 1- That Abraham didn’t exist. 2- That the LDS BOA is ahistorical. 3- That the BOA is modern fiction/pseudepigrapha. As far as I can tell, the statement affirms the historicity of both Abraham and the events described in the Book of Abraham. Any claims to the contrary seriously misrepresent the issues at hand, and the significance of the Church statement.

Ancient Studies

Book of Abraham

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Mormon Studies

Religion

historicity

Previous Post

July 11, 2014

What is Scripture? and is it relevant?

Next Post

July 11, 2014 Ether's Cave

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ancient Studies Atheism Bible bibliography Book of Abraham Book of Mormon Book of Moses Christianity Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Deseret News Column Doctrine and Covenants Documentary Hypothesis Genesis Haram al-Sharif Historicity History Islam Israelite Religion Judaism LDS Mormon Studies Mormonism Mormons Movies Noah Penteteuch Photography Religion Temple Temple Mount Temples Third Temple Movements Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 October 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the name "Moses" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Saved Drawn out (of water) Delivered Judge