It’s not Personal

Last updated on: May 11, 2014 at 3:43 pm by William Hamblin

It’s not Personal 2014-05-11T15:43:26-07:00 William Hamblin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Stephen Smoot made an insightful comment here:

[Quoting Hamblin:] “But what they cannot do is avoid the logical and inevitable implications of what they believe. It is not bullying, insulting, nor demeaning to question and debate these matters.”

This reminds me of the reaction some had to my article “The Imperative for a Historical Book of Mormon” (online here: http://www.mormoninterpreter.c…. I was accused by many of wanting to exclude members of the Church who disbelieve in the Book of Mormon’s historicity, or who have different views of the nature of scripture, or who don’t read scriptural stories “literally,” etc. I was cast into some sort of Grand Inquisitor who is on the hunt for unorthodox members who need to be excluded from fellowship.

This, of course, is nonsense. I never intimated any such attitude in my article, which merely addressed and critiqued the logical and theological reasoning behind the so-called Inspired Fiction Theory for the Book of Mormon. I never said that one should leave the Church if one ascribes to this theory, only that one should very carefully reconsider the implications this theory had for the substance of Mormon belief in the Restoration.

It seems to be common among many these days to immediately assume a personal attack was intended when one’s views or ideas are critiqued or scrutinized. That’s too bad, as this attitude can very quickly end meaningful discourse and discussion.

I fully support Stephen’s views.

David’s supporters have been claiming that I am making personal attacks against David. I am not. I am critiquing his ideas. That’s it.

I like David, and I’m sorry he’s mad at me. David is a very nice fellow. He’s also bright and knowledgable. However, I disagree with his views on the Documentary Hypothesis, and on the significance of historicity of scripture. That’s it.

David has made his views on these matters public. I have publicly critiqued his views. That’s it.

Everything else is merely the rhetorical fallacy of distraction.

Furthermore, if members of the Church who reject historicity of scripture want to stay members and come to church, and socialize with the Saints, that’s fine with me. Everyone’s welcome as far as I’m concerned. That does not mean I have to accept or legitimize their views. That does not mean I cannot critique their views, just as they are free to critique mine.

Anyway, this nonsense has gone on long enough. Too long. Any further comments about who’s being mean to whom, how much of a jerk I am, or speculations about whether David really believes what he writes or not will not be posted. Further comments on the subtance of the arugments will be gladly accepted.

Ancient Studies

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Documentary Hypothesis

History

Religion

historicity

Previous Post

May 11, 2014

Bokovoy's Response

Next Post

May 12, 2014 DH-32: Source Criticism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ancient Studies Atheism Bible bibliography Book of Abraham Book of Mormon Book of Moses Christianity Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Deseret News Column Doctrine and Covenants Documentary Hypothesis Genesis Haram al-Sharif Historicity History Islam Israelite Religion Judaism LDS Mormon Studies Mormonism Mormons Movies Noah Penteteuch Photography Religion Temple Temple Mount Temples Third Temple Movements Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 October 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city did the Good Samaritan's story happen on the road to?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bethlehem Nazareth Jericho Jerusalem