Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Emergent Village

“Thank-you Donald Trump!”

Last updated on: September 7, 2015 at 10:56 am   by Tim Conder

“Thank-you Donald Trump!” 2015-09-07T10:56:49-05:00 Tim Conder

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

imagesSeriously. Thank-you Donald Trump and your ‘realityshowesque’ and ‘plainspoken’ Presidential campaign. Let me quickly explain myself. My recently found gratitude for the GOP front runner is not some form of liberal campaign rubbernecking — my slowing down the car just so I can gawk at the aftermath of an inevitable accident in the other lane.

Trump’s campaign has regularly inspired glee among liberals and pundits (cf. John Stewart a year ago when confronted with a potential Trump run impishly begging “please, please, please, please” or Rachel Maddow’s recent dissection of Trump on Jimmy Fallon). Alternatively, he has provoked disdain, fear, and outright disgust from some on the right. Last week, Rick Wilson, an experienced Republican operative referred to Trump as a “‘cancer,’ an ‘epic douche canoe, a ‘statist’ with ‘a little delicious hint of fascism in the mix’ whose presidential nomination will spell apocalypse for the Republican Party” (retrieved from cnn.com). These angles have been well covered, and rightly so. Certainly, those who are neutral on Trump are seemingly hard to find.

Like so many, I have recoiled at his ego, simplistic perspective on complex issues, misogyny, xenophobia, and racism. Like some, I am certainly aware of how Trump’s campaign could bolster the success of candidates I prefer. Nonetheless, I am thankful for Mr. Trump because he constantly makes visible, overt, and explicit that which has far greater power when remaining invisible, covert, and implicit. Racism is made more dangerous when it is made invisible by the protestations that we live in a post-racial society — homophobia becomes more cruel behind the seemingly virtuous claims of personal conscience exercised in public and diverse spaces — patriarchy remains more durable behind uncritical assertions of equal opportunity and the adoration of women. Thankfully many popular and scholarly writers have well documented the move in our society from overt subjugation to covert domination in the realm of race (cf. Michael Omi and Howard Winant’s excellent text, Racial Formation in the United States).

The ‘invisibility game’ is not just the purview of conservatives. It can be equally insidious when played by liberals. In liberal communities, the declaration of inequities are often silenced and meaningful activism blunted by the oppressive regimes of niceness, tolerance, shock, and abstract (non-practiced) convictions of equity. I strongly recommend that you read Rev. Alex Gee’s December 18, 2013, op-ed to the liberal bastion of Madison, WI, <http://host.madison.com/news/local/city-life/justified-anger-rev-alex-gee-says-madison-is-failing-its/article_14f6126c-fc1c-55aa-a6a3-6c3d00a4424c.html> that gave birth to the “Justified Anger” movement in his community and state. After speaking to the downtown rotary on the mass incarceration of black men, he was thanked for not being “some angry black man.” He realized that his determined anger at an epidemic of racial practices in his nice liberal community was lost in his skills of presentation, his status as a community leader, and his strong educational background. In other words, despite being stopped and searched by the police many times even in the parking lot of the church with his name on the marquis, he seemed to abide by the dominant culture demand of niceness in Madison.

But the ‘invisibility game’ in our society is becoming much tougher to play thanks to plainspoken leaders like Trump who refuse to play by its rules. For this, I am indeed thankful.

But for the community of Christian faith, I think more is required than simply connecting the dots of policy and prejudice made easier by the bombastic claims of the likes of Donald Trump. Ironically, Mr. Trump is unwittingly winning at the invisibility game with his unmistakable biblical illiteracy (Though he claims the Bible is his favorite book, he seems unable to name a single verse and is hardly able to name a single character — surely you saw some of the meme’s that saturated the web a couple of weeks ago!)

His theological ignorance, which is not an offense to me, enhances the ability of many devout Christians of every ilk to distance a Christian theological logic from the contemporary enactments of race, homophobia, and patriarchy in our society. Embedded inside the invisibility game is often an accompanying invisible hermeneutic. This hermeneutic sometimes reads the biblical text with a plainspoken literalism that would make Mr. Trump proud. Sadly, the grounding of this literalism is not in the simplicity of a gospel of love. At other times, this is a more sophisticated reading sourced in the ascent of the modern individual, the divine hegemony of markets, and the rationales of rights and accumulation that are truly alien to inexhaustible richness of hospitality described in the gospel. I believe we must not only be activists rooted in a gospel of love, we must also to take on the invisible hermeneutic that drives the contradictory consciousness of many in our society.

Our own assault against the invisibility game is admittedly quite difficult. But there’s hope often found within the bonds of safe and reflective community. I took a call last week by an extremely thoughtful friend from within our community about a current issue where our stances differed significantly. In our discussion, which was not a jousting energized by the hopes of persuasion, we were able to quickly move to the (often) invisible hermeneutic that both of us applied to this issue. The conversation was delightful, fruitful, and will yield many others. Now several years ago, my friend Dan Rhodes and I wrote a passionate plea toward community hermeneutics in a book entitled Free for All. I remain deeply convinced that communitarian, embodied hermeneutic remains the path forward in an age of rhetorical assault.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



September 7, 2015

I am not you but I am not other than you, either

Next Post



September 8, 2015 Call and Affirmation


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Addiction Advent Atheism Authority Bible Cartoons Christian Year Christmas church church planting Civil Rights Community Contemplative Spirituality Culture emerging church Empire Eschatology Evangelism Events Gender Healing Humanism Islam Justice Kingdom Lent Movement Building Multi-Faith Music mysticism New Wave Emergence origins Personal Poetry politics Prayer Preaching Privilege Racism Religious naturalism Resurrection salvation SKEPTIMERGENT Theology Trauma Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: James states that the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Related posts from Emergent Village

Progressive Christian

The Body Never Lies

Emergent Village

Progressive Christian

Christmas in the Intersections

Emergent Village

Progressive Christian

I hope you kneel

Emergent Village

Progressive Christian

My Body and My Faith

Emergent Village

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube