Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Emergent Village

Home
Progressive Christian
Missional Implications of The Differend by J.F. Lyotard pt. 3

Missional Implications of The Differend by J.F. Lyotard pt. 3

Last updated on: October 31, 2012 at 5:39 pm by Michael D. Bobo

Missional Implications of The Differend by J.F. Lyotard pt. 3 2012-10-31T17:39:41-05:00 Michael D. Bobo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In this third post, there is one more missional implication worth mentioning. Emergence can serve as a restorer and rebuilder in breached relationships in abusive Christian contexts. This is very close to my heart since I came out of abusive fundamentalist communities twice in my life. Once as a child and once as a young adult. I couldn’t get the clue the first time, but as a survivor I see clearly how much room there is for this kind of advocacy in Emergence.

Language games permeate Christian contexts and to some degree are unavoidable. The games are not the problem. The fallout from unhealthy language games is. Open minded or thought provoking dialog is essential to healthy Christian spirituality, but once an idiom is imposed upon a community that dictates the whys, hows, whens, wheres, etc. an inevitable environment for differend arises.

The role for Emergence is even more vital in cases of sexual abuse within churches. Silence of these victims must be rectified by the advocacy of others who will speak the idiom of the abuser and bring forth justice on behalf of the abused. These fear-based contexts manipulate others to exploit leader’s perversions which thrive on control. Such environments are factories for differend. Once we appropriate Lyotard’s language it is easy to see where and how they occur.

Unlike Auschwitz, there are multiple cases where surviving victims of differend are living and are able to be aided. The challenge is calling forth the darkness in the language of the abuser and being a bridge to communicate between the victim and the abuser in a manner that addresses both parties.

French literary studies provide a compelling example of how this can occur:

Moving away from philosophy to French literary studies, Robert Harvey sees the lack of a witness or a “telltale” as a missing link in the case of the differend. In order to fill in the gaps that Lyotard intentionally leaves within his philosophy of the differend, Harvey uses literary methods to address the differend and to propose what he considers to be an ethical remedy to it. “The differend cannot provide an ethical product of work as long as there is no telltale,” asserts Harvey (110). The French word témoin holds a significant double meaning that fills in the perceived gap that Lyotard should have addressed. It means both an item used to repair a crack in a wall and a witness. Harvey sees both of these meanings as essential components to the mystery of the differend. In order to address the wrong done to the victim, the account of a witness can be an essential component of a legal case. The bridge that fills in the spaces or cracks of the case of a differend is the person who is an advocate in his or her observation of what occurred. According to Harvey, the survivors of the Holocaust are the témoin who enable the Nazi regime to be called into account for its horrific deeds. This positive insight by a fellow Frenchman contributes positively toward an idiom that promotes justice, such a Lyotard desires. Harvey astutely observes, “At the heart of the theory of the differend, it is just such a witness that is missing” (110).

Victims of spiritual and sexual abuse can be witnesses to the fact that this occurs in Christian communities. We can bring forth light and truth in the darkness and deception of such environments. Rather than promote new areas to fight over language, we have the privilege of reaching out to those who have been victims of extremism, who have left local churches and been ostracized or slandered, who have suffered under the control and perversion of leaders professing to be Christian. Furthermore, Emergence can provide a new idiom for Christian teaching and discipleship to take into account so many areas of past failure and blame. We have a unique privilege of structuring our language games to advocate and to witness these cases. We can be part of the solution that Lyotard was at an impass to resolve in some cases. The key is having the awareness and passion to proceed as témoin.

—–

Here are some resources to consider Lyotard’s The Differend further:

Carroll, David. “Rephrasing the Political with Kant and Lyotard: From Aesthetic to Political Judgments.” Diacritics. 14.3 (1984): 74-88.

Crome, Keith. “Lyotard and the Greeks: on the problem of nature in the differend.” Journal of the Theoretical Humanities. II.3 (2006): 93-104.

Derrida, Jacques. “Lyotard and us.” parallax. 6.4 (2000): 28-48.

Dunn, Allen. “A Tyranny of Justice: The Ethics of Lyotard’s Differend.” boundary 2.20.1 (1993): 192-220.

Harvey, Robert. “Telltale at the Passages.” Yale French Studies. 99 (2001): 102-116.

Kotowicz, Zbigniew. “Notes on Lyotard’s Route to Atomism.” parallax. 6.4 (2000): 114-126.

Lyotard, Jean-François. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Trans. Georges Van Den Abbeele. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.

Lyotard, Jean-François and Georges Van Den Abbeele. Interview. Diacritics. 14.3 (1984): 16-21.

Lyotard, Jean-François. Peregrinations: law, form, event. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.

Manning, Robert John Sheffler. Review of The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. The Journal of Religion. 71. 2 (1991): 282-283.

Raffel, Stanley. Habermas, Lyotard and the Concept of Justice. London: Macmillan Press, Ltd., 1992.

Rapaport, Herman. Review of Le Differend. SubStance. 15.1 49 (1986): 83-86.

Stivale, Charles. Review of The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. The French Review. 63.4 (1990): 722-723.

Strobbe, Nicholas. “Political Identification or the Differend.” Law Text Culture. 4.2 (1998): 263-288.

White, Eric. “Lyotard’s Neo-Sophistic Philosophy of Phrases.” Poetics Today. 15.3 (1994): 479-493.

Williams, James. Lyotard and the Political. New York: Routledge, 2000.

Jean-Francois Lyotard

Previous Post

October 26, 2012

In the end, it's all about love... nothing else.

Next Post

October 31, 2012 Bible meditation versus The Ear Worm

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Addiction Advent Atheism Authority Bible Cartoons Christian Year Christmas church church planting Civil Rights Community Contemplative Spirituality Culture emerging church Empire Eschatology Evangelism Events Gender Healing Humanism Islam Justice Kingdom Lent Movement Building Multi-Faith Music mysticism New Wave Emergence origins Personal Poetry politics Prayer Preaching Privilege Racism Religious naturalism Resurrection salvation SKEPTIMERGENT Theology Trauma Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

"Thou shalt not take the ___________ of the Lord thy God in vain...."

Select your answer to see how you score.

Words Name Thought Life