Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Emergent Village

God is a [pro]stit[ut]e

Last updated on: May 10, 2012 at 6:09 am   by George Elerick

God is a [pro]stit[ut]e 2012-05-10T06:09:22-05:00 George Elerick

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Doctor Daniel Paul Schreber complains of the compulsive thinking that he is forced to endure, a process of “having to think continually,” in opposition to “man’s natural right of mental relaxation, of temporary rest from mental activity through thinking nothing.” Never a moment in which not to think and feel. Machines within me, engines in hyperdrive, factories in constant overproduction. Bataille argues that nature and capitalism alike are driven not by scarcity, but by excess, a superabundance that we are unable to discharge: “The sun dispenses energy–wealth–without any return. The sun gives without ever receiving.” My own body is suffused with such surplus. But it is impossible to emulate the sun, impossible for me ever to spend or squander enough. No wonder I find it difficult to get enough sleep. Schreber, suffering under the weight of this irreversible generosity, unable to suspend his exquisite soul-voluptuousness and pay off his debt, screams that the sun is a whore, and identifies it with God.

What is God if not a notion of a continuously self-giving God who never requires a return. In some Christian circles, there is this idea that we get everything and God keeps giving. But does not God get tired and exhausted, frustrated and depleted by this excess? The question of excess [as in God gives without receiving] is a God who is repeatedly driven by his/her neurosis to make creation happy. God in his dedication to the cosmos has created many things in excess. The weather being one of them, the excess of knowledge about the universe [as in we cannot know all of the universe]. Reality is driven by this elusive excess. It is God attempting to please man in the hope that creation would find happiness in what is being created. This happiness is then that which drives God to create the world in excess. God is attempting to fill a void. The anxiety of God is that God is driven by such an aggressive excess because he/she does not recognize his/her own individual value of self thereby negating himself through Jesus. In a very simple sense. Jesus is the social superego of God. He keeps God in check, hence why he claims: I and God are one. We read it as a subjective relationship, however, it is that they are equals who sublimate each other.

And what of us? What of our need to fulfill God’s addiction to us? Going to Church. Reading the Bible. Feeding the Poor. Fighting against the Bourgeois. Incessant Conversions. Guilt-laden requests of penance. Loving our neighbour. Loving our enemy. Writing Books. Drinking the Body and Blood. Fighting against Satan. Having ecstatic moments of awe. Tasting and Seeing that the Lord is Good. And that’s all in one day. This is what drives us. This is what drives God. It is a reflexive addiction.

Another social example would be the nature of capitalism, which hides itself in our over-commitment to it. It feeds on our exhaustion. It feeds on our inability to resist its addictive ploys and anti-revolutionary cries: “Produce! Produce! Produce!”. It being a machine can only do one thing, create more machines. More producers. And here is the perversity of it all, its all spiritualized. There is something holy in keeping the machine alive. In fighting for our individuality and false sense of fulfillment and happiness. We reify the object of our desire to the point that gods emerge out of God. We create more idols out of idolatry. We fight for the products that produce us. It is not that we go to church to make ourselves better christians, it is that the machine of the institution makes better copies of itself and we over-spiritualize the reification of such a process by deeming it Christian.

Our understandings of God are mere reflections of that which we think we have a choice to define us, and yet, those choices define for us what we should/should not believe. If God is about freedom [which Jesus seems to think S/He is] then freedom is what should drive us into more freedom, not into things, objects or addictions that drive us deeper into some cosmic slavery with God. We need less of God’s generosity and more of God’s identity, on her/his/its own terms.

In a very practical sense, think of a relationship in an employment setting. One cannot be an employee without an employer. There are certain tasks set out for the employee to do, and they tend to be assessed based on their ability to perform said tasks [usually within a given time-frame]. So what we have here is something we all have become used to and are not aware, two things: Ideology & Identity. Most think they can separate themselves from their work, the bad thing is this, they can’t. Once you accept a contract [commandments?] you then now are responsible to fulfill that identity, whether you agree with it or not. {Hence, why God loses his patience, and at times, vice versa]. But in a relationship such as this, we can only refer to the relationship as a sexual one. I dont mean sexual in the traditional sense, but rather, one of extreme erotic over-compensation where one takes on the role of dominant partner [i.e., the employer], and the other as the submissive partner [i.e., the employee]. It is one defined by its dysfunction, excess and perversion of power. Which seem to me to be things that a large part of liberation theology, process theology and the like disavow and turn away from. Is not the parable of the Lost Son about G-d losing himself without us and finding himself, and dont we share in this story?

God must remove himself from the stories made about him. We must remove ourselves from the stories we think about ourselves. It is not an end to The Story, but rather, a decentering of that which we have come to deify. It is not a perpetual end to all identity, but rather an emptying of self. We have centered ourselves around exhaustive procedures that we think will either fulfill us or fulfill God, and unfortunately, it seems both of us [us and G-d] have come to believe the lies. So, how do prostitutes move out of such a profession? They leave their current context. We must do the same to come to experience the freedom spoken about by Jesus of Nazareth.

 

 

church

Culture

emerging church

Previous Post



May 9, 2012

Faith and Politics: 'What's Fair is Fair' is not Fair Anymore by Randy S. Woodley

Next Post



May 10, 2012 On My Mind These Days


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Addiction Advent Atheism Authority Bible Cartoons Christian Year Christmas church church planting Civil Rights Community Contemplative Spirituality Culture emerging church Empire Eschatology Evangelism Events Gender Healing Humanism Islam Justice Kingdom Lent Movement Building Multi-Faith Music mysticism New Wave Emergence origins Personal Poetry politics Prayer Preaching Privilege Racism Religious naturalism Resurrection salvation SKEPTIMERGENT Theology Trauma Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Shield of Faith protect believers from?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Earthly wealth Physical attacks The need for armor The fiery darts of the enemy

Related posts from Emergent Village

Progressive Christian

My Body and My Faith

Emergent Village

Progressive Christian

#Charlottesville - What Can I Do?

Emergent Village

Progressive Christian

What Should I Say When I Have Nothing...

Emergent Village

Progressive Christian

Parable of the Triangle: Blessed are those who...

Emergent Village

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Pastoral Wisdom for Responding to Sermon Pushback

Getting sermon pushback on your social justice sermon? Learn practical, Proverbs-based strategies...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube