“Inspiration Porn” Objectifies People with Disabilities

Last updated on: May 19, 2014 at 9:08 am by Ellen Painter Dollar

“Inspiration Porn” Objectifies People with Disabilities 2014-05-19T09:08:39-04:00 Ellen Painter Dollar

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When Daniel and I visited Yosemite National Park to celebrate our first wedding anniversary, we undertook a hike up to one of the park’s waterfalls. The hike was easy enough that the trail was crowded, but it was still an uphill slog requiring strength and stamina. As a young man and his companion blew by us, he turned to me and said, “Good for you for doing this. I really admire you.” Those words didn’t make me feel warm and fuzzy, nor did they give me a burst of newfound energy. Rather, they made me angry. With those words, that young man treated me as an object, a “disabled person” instead of just a “person”—worthy of admiration although he knew nothing about me apart from the fact that I walk with a limp and was working harder than others to get up that hill.

All my life, I have been admired, called brave and inspirational, because I live with a disability. And all my life, I have found that admiration and those labels ridiculous. Admire me for what I do—for writing well or raising decent kids or having a lovely garden. But don’t admire me just for existing, just because I live a mostly unremarkable life with scars and a limp and a history of dozens of broken bones. Admiration of this sort is really just pity in disguise. The implication? “If I had a body like yours, I would hide myself at home all day. You must have huge reserves of courage, to bring this body out into public every day.”

Australian journalist and comedian Stella Young, who has the same genetic bone disorder I do, calls the misplaced admiration of disabled people because of our disabilities “inspiration porn.” In this TEDx talk (just under 10 minutes long), she does a terrific job of explaining how “inspiration porn,” like other kinds of porn, objectifies people. I don’t agree completely with Young’s contentions that disability is solely a social construct, that nothing about a disability is intrinsically a “Bad Thing,” and that social and cultural barriers are the only obstacles people with disabilities face. I think that dozens of broken bones, chronic pain, and many other aspects of OI are intrinsic Bad Things—which is not to say that I deserve pity or that my life is miserable.

But I agree with Young that naming and eradicating the social and cultural barriers that objectify people with disabilities is indeed a matter of justice. She makes a convincing argument, with a good dose of humor.

Previous Post

May 16, 2014

We Know God Through Scripture...and So Much More

Next Post

May 21, 2014 Abiding with the Living and the Dying: Thoughts on "Holding Silvan"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category disability ethics parenthood Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the longest Gospel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Luke John Mark Matthew