Friendship, Love, and the Arts: A Belated Review of Tolkien

Last updated on: August 24, 2019 at 3:34 pm by David Russell Mosley

Friendship, Love, and the Arts: A Belated Review of Tolkien 2019-08-24T15:34:35-04:00 David Russell Mosley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ordinary Time St. Bartholomew’s Day The Edge of Elfland Concord, New Hampshire

Dearest Readers,

Last night my wife and I finally say down and watched the film Tolkien. I did my best to come to it with an open mind and tried to avoid reviews of the film before seeing it. I did not want my own first impressions too overly tainted by the opinions of others. Still, I went into it more hopeful than I at first felt because people I respect lauded and praised it, or at least said it wasn’t as bad as they had feared.

The film is beautifully shot and wonderfully cast. Nicholas Holt and Lilly Collins clearly had chemistry. One watched them as they fell in love and then separated with real emotion. I also thought the interweaving of Tolkien’s life leading up to the war with his time in it masterfully done. They showed an imaginative version of the effects trench fever might have had on a mind like Tolkien’s. Perhaps what shines most in the film, however, is the relationship between the four members of the T.C.B.S (Tea Club and Barrovian Society).

These four friends with their battle cry of Helheimr, and their desire to change the world through their art, were the central story of Tolkien’s early life. But this makes one wonder if perhaps the title isn’t a little off. After all, a biopic on J.R.R. Tolkien called simply Tolkien might lead viewers to believe it would be a film dedicated to the whole life of the eponymous protagonist. And even if early synopses and trailers showed that it would focus on his pre-Hobbit life, leading to the penning of those famous words, “In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit,” still might one believe the film would show us more than it did.

Many other Catholic viewers have bemoaned the lack of overt references to Tolkien’s Catholicism. And I too will admit that I would have liked to see more made of it, though one can assume that some of Tolkien’s early ostracization at King Edward’s was due to his faith. The scene of all the boys singing and Tolkien just mouthing along until he defeatedly closed his mouth is a subtle but important vision of this. The film picks up after Tolkien’s father’s death and before his mother’s. Yet we never find out that she died in part because she had been cast off by her family for her conversion to Catholicism (If you want to read a short reflection on Tolkien’s Catholicism, here is a short piece I wrote for U.S. Catholic Magazine). Still, I don’t fault the movie for not going into this more. Depicting faith is a difficult, though by no means impossible, thing. And what’s more, should everyone’s favorite aspect of Tolkien’s life from the time period depicted be added in, the film would be longer than Jackson’s Lord of the Rings and Hobbit trilogies combined.

And this is why I think the friendship, or perhaps better fellowship, of the T.C.B.S is so central. We are shown the centrality of friendship for the arts, even if it is only a very small group that does very little. Gilson, Smith, Wiseman, and Tolkien, in their naive and visionary youth dreamt that they could change the course of human history through art. Yet human history had its say as well, killing half the members of the T.C.B.S. and inflicting one of the survivors, presumably, with PTSD. And yet, their efforts were not in vain. Tolkien lived and, like Milne and C.S. Lewis, and many others, turned that trauma into something beautiful. I wept openly as Tolkien met with Geoffrey’s mother discussing his poetry and pleading with her that in this moment, poetry and love were exactly what the world needed.

And this, I think, may be the film’s greatest failure. It clearly centered not Tolkien’s love of Edith (which takes many licenses with the more fantastic reality) but on his friendships. Thus, in the end we see him failing to write. We get that heart-breaking conversation with Edith where we see that his attempts are, at least at times (and it is implied to happen more than it seemingly did, Tolkien was not like Milne in his fatherhood), keeping him from fully engaging with his family. The film was thus primed to introduce us to Lewis or the Coal-biters (which included Lewis) or even an early, and anachronistic, Inklings meeting. This would have shown us the continued need for art in community, that Tolkien’s greatest achievements came about in part because of his friendships. This was a missed opportunity in a film that clearly wanted to tell not a love story, at least not a romantic love story, even though it included one, but a story of the love had between friends.

In the end, Tolkien is still overall a success and I hope it will inspire others to read more of Tolkien’s works and to learn more about his life. For a fuller picture, you can’t go wrong with Humphrey Carpenter’s biography, but if you want more of Tolkien in context, then I suggest Bandersnatch by Diana Glyer and The Fellowship: The Literary Lives of the Inklings: J.R.R. Tolkien, C. S. Lewis, Owen Barfield, Charles Williams by Philip and Carol Zaleski.

Sincerely,
David Russell Mosley

J. R. R. Tolkien

Literature and Poetry

Previous Post

August 10, 2019

Burial Gardens and Life from Death: On Taking My Children to the Cemetery

Next Post

August 25, 2019 William Blake on the Creative Spirit, Beauty, and Imagination: A Response to Brain Pickings

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Secular Age Advent Apologetics Atheism Beauty Being a Catholic Evangelical Being Catholic Being Deified: Poetry and Fantasy on the Path to God Blogging Book Reviews C. S. Lewis Catholic Imagination Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Christmas Church Calendar Church Fathers Church Life Community Conferences Cosmology Creation Curdled Words Deification Distributism Easter Economics Education Epiphany Essay Extracts Eucharist Faerie Faeriean Metaphysics Fatherhood Films Folk Liturgy Food and Drink G. K. Chesterton Harry Potter J. R. R. Tolkien Jove King Arthur Language Lent Life Literature and Poetry Liturgy Medieval Theology Music My Publications Mythology On the Edges of Elfland Ordinary Time Ordination Parenthood Parish Patristic Theology Pentecost Politics Prayer Racism Radical Orthodoxy Restoration Movement Sacramental Ontology Saints Science Sex and Sexuality Sophiology Stories The Inklings The Radical Catholic Reimagination of Everything Theologians in the Church Theopoetics Thesis Research Uncategorized University of Nottingham What I'm Reading Writing

Select a Month December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz