Lewis Among the Evangelicals Part 2: Fixing Some Mistakes and Going a Little Deeper

Last updated on: October 6, 2016 at 8:30 am by David Russell Mosley

Lewis Among the Evangelicals Part 2: Fixing Some Mistakes and Going a Little Deeper 2016-10-06T08:30:26-04:00 David Russell Mosley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

David Russell Mosley

Description This is a photo of "The Kilns" - C.S. Lewis' home in Oxford. This picture, and all pictures in this series were taken in 1997. Date 24 June 2005, 18:29 Source Lewis' House Author jschroe from Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, USA (CC BY 2.0)

Description
This is a photo of “The Kilns” – C.S. Lewis’ home in Oxford. This picture, and all pictures in this series were taken in 1997.
Date 24 June 2005, 18:29
Source Lewis’ House
Author jschroe from Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, USA
(CC BY 2.0)

Ordinary Time
6 October 2016
The Edge of Elfland
Hudson, New Hampshire

Dear Readers,

Yesterday I wrote to you about some of my confusion over evangelical love for Lewis. In that letter I focused on social aspects of Lewis’ life that many evangelicals would find distasteful at best and downright sinful at worst. While the ultimate point of that letter was to focus on the possible ecumenism, there was also the tacit point that certain things Lewis did would exclude him from employment at many institutions that revere him today. That said, I want to clear up a few things from my previous letter and make just a few short remarks on theological issues that will arrive or should arrive or perhaps even have arrived when one studies Lewis carefully.

Mistakes

First, and foremost, I need to apologize for a real mistake I made. In the title of my post I called Lewis a Brit. This is not really true. Lewis was born in Belfast which makes him Irish, kind of. In truth, Belfast was at the time of Lewis’ birth and still is part of the United Kingdom. Now this would not make Lewis a Brit since technically Great Britain is England, Scotland, and Wales and the United Kingdom is Great Britain and Northern Ireland. I knew this and know it still and yet used the word Brit in the title. Now, I think to a large extent Lewis did become a Brit. He spoke with a posh Oxbridge accent and never resided in Ireland again after moving to Oxford. Still, under a most technical definition, he was not a Brit.

Defining Evangelicalism

When I wrote about evangelicals in my previous letter, my emphasis was certainly more on behaviors, acceptable and unacceptable, than it was on beliefs. The reason for this, by and large, was that I thought of the title for that letter and the Tolkien quote rather simultaneously. Now the truth of the matter is that many evangelicals today are beginning to turn around on issues of alcohol and tobacco (two of Lewis’ key “sins”). I do think it would be interesting to see, however, what relationship there is between evangelicals who drink and/or smoke and evangelicals who lean away from evangelicalism to the more catholic/high church. All that said, none of this changes the fact that Lewis has been a major player in the evangelical world even while he was still alive and yet acted in a way that was fine for British Christian life (at least in Lewis’ circles) but would be condemned in many churches in the United States.

All that said, if we take a definition of evangelicalism that does not focus on behavior but on beliefs, we find Lewis an odd match still. I’ve covered several of these issues in a previous letter and so don’t want to rehash them now. I do want to cover a few topics, however. First of all, evangelicalism any more has become so broad and amorphous that it is nearly impossible to define. It is trans-denominational and also includes more “progressive” and more “conservative” elements.

Theologically and traditionally, at least according to Pierard and Elwell in the Evangelical Dictionary of Theology (see pages 406-407), evangelicals hold to:

The sovereignty of God
God’s holiness that precludes his ability to look on sin
God’s love and compassion for sinners
Scripture as divinely inspired
Scripture as infallible
Scripture as inerrant
Humans are totally deprave from birth
Penal Substitutionary Atonement
Salvation is by faith through grace
Proclaiming the Gospel
The return of Christ

This is not an exhaustive list of what evangelicals believe, but it is a central one. Although I would argue that not all Evangelicals are Reformed and thus not all Evangelicals hold to total depravity. Still, this is how Pierard and Elwell define it. Looking at this list there are many things Lewis would find uncontroversial. He too believed that God is sovereign (although he would not have meant it in a Reformed way) and believed that God is holy (his ability to “look” at sin could be contested within Lewis’ writing). Lewis did not believe the Scriptures were inerrant, not in the ways that is often meant today; he certainly would have rejected total depravity and was not a fan of Penal Substitutionary Atonement. With the final three, with some caveats (especially for the means of salvation), Lewis would likely have agreed. Which all of this is to say that insofar as Lewis was an orthodox Christian and insofar as any item on the above list is orthodox, the two would have lined up. None of this, of course, changes where Lewis disagreed or other beliefs Lewis held that are, according to one evangelical author, shocking.

Fiction vs. Apologetics?

This brings me to my final point, one that was suggested by several readers of yesterday’s letter. Some suggested that perhaps the reason evangelicals in particular latch onto Lewis is through his apologetic works whereas the more catholically minded tend toward his fiction. I find this intriguing, but it would require a certain amount of sociological and statistical work that I have not the time, inclination, nor ability to undertake. I do think there is something to this, potentially. But at the same time, I think Lewis understood something that many have forgotten. He understood that apologetics and the faith itself must be imaginative. That we must show not only the Christianity is reasonable or argue that it is true, but that it is also good and beautiful. That he understood this is evident from the various stories and even short essays he left us, as well as the often narratival form his apologetic works took. Lewis understood that evangelism could not be all debate and argument, but that it must also be through stories and song, food and drink, and yes, even tobacco. As I said in a letter from a few years ago, we cannot discreetly divide up the catholic and evangelical Lewis. We must, if we truly want to understand his intellectual and imaginative project, take the man as a whole.

Sincerely,
David

Being a Catholic Evangelical

Previous Post

October 5, 2016

Lewis among the Evangelicals: Trying to Understand why a Catholic Leaning, Tobacco Smoking, Alcohol Drinking Brit Is So Popular Amongst Evangelicals

Next Post

October 17, 2016 On the Five Ways and Deification at Eclectic Orthodoxy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Secular Age Advent Apologetics Atheism Beauty Being a Catholic Evangelical Being Catholic Being Deified: Poetry and Fantasy on the Path to God Blogging Book Reviews C. S. Lewis Catholic Imagination Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Christmas Church Calendar Church Fathers Church Life Community Conferences Cosmology Creation Curdled Words Deification Distributism Easter Economics Education Epiphany Essay Extracts Eucharist Faerie Faeriean Metaphysics Fatherhood Films Folk Liturgy Food and Drink G. K. Chesterton Harry Potter J. R. R. Tolkien Jove King Arthur Language Lent Life Literature and Poetry Liturgy Medieval Theology Music My Publications Mythology On the Edges of Elfland Ordinary Time Ordination Parenthood Parish Patristic Theology Pentecost Politics Prayer Racism Radical Orthodoxy Restoration Movement Sacramental Ontology Saints Science Sex and Sexuality Sophiology Stories The Inklings The Radical Catholic Reimagination of Everything Theologians in the Church Theopoetics Thesis Research Uncategorized University of Nottingham What I'm Reading Writing

Select a Month December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz