Imaginative Apologetics: A Turn to the Good and the Beautiful as well as the True

Last updated on: December 1, 2015 at 3:54 pm by David Russell Mosley

Imaginative Apologetics: A Turn to the Good and the Beautiful as well as the True 2015-12-01T15:54:48-04:00 David Russell Mosley

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

David Russell Mosley

flammarion-woodcut

Advent
1 December 2015
The Edge of Elfland
Hudson, New Hampshire

Dear Friends and Family,

About a month or so ago I finished reading an excellent little book called Imaginative Apologetics: Theology, Philosophy and the Catholic Tradition. Some of you who know me will know that I have some issues with modern apologetics. For those unfamiliar with the term, apologetics means a defense. In most Christian circles these days it means a reasoned defense of the main tenets of the Christian faith: the existence of God, of Jesus, of the Resurrection, etc. If you’ve seen or read books by Lee Strobel or Alvin Plantinga (two very different types of author, I admit), then you’ve got a sense of what much of modern Christian apologetics is about. There is a problem with all this, however (actually there are many). The late Fr John Hughes, who has an essay in this book, describes the problem this way:

Richard Swinburne famously claims to calculate the statistical probability of the existence of God and the resurrection of Christ. It is worth pausing to consider this for a moment. This is problematic, to put it mildly, not only in that these calculations clearly fail to resolve the matter (or else why would there still be atheists), but also absurd in suggesting that the existence of God and the resurrection of Christ are things whose probability can be measured like any other ordinary “thing” in the world, in the same way one might wonder about the existence of an ancient Greek battle or another planet in our solar system, rather than something much more fundamental which alters one’s entire view of everything.

Essentially, what Hughes is onto here is that so much of modern apologetics tries to play by the atheists rules. That is, in doing this kind of apologetics we are acting as though God is just another thing in cosmos which can be examined like any other thing, rather than unconditioned reality that creates and upholds all created reality. Similarly, and even more interestingly, Hughes reminds us that even the Christ-event (a fancy term concerning the entirety of Christ’s life from conception to Ascension) is decidedly not like any other event. It is a worldview changer, because it reflects something deeper about reality.

However, Hughes, nor the other contributors to this wonderful book, is not content to complain about the issues of modern apologetics. Instead, Hughes et al., suggest that a modern apologetic must attract our sense of the Good and the Beautiful as well as the True. Discussing Alisdair McIntyre’s deconstruction of postmodern irrationalism, Hughes writes:

And because we are creatures of flesh and blood rather than pure intelligences, these arguments will persuade us not by some irrefutable logic, but also by all the powers of persuasion, by their goodness and even their beauty. They will be arguments which must be enacted in our lives as well as in our words. But if they are authentic then their rhetoric will persuade by virtue of their inherent beauty and goodness, rather than because of some added spin or window dressing. Form is not accidentally related to content: the medium must fit the message.

For Hughes logical proofs are not what will bring people to faith. After all, a logical proof can be totally valid if we assume all the premises are true, but, especially when it comes to questions of the existence of God, we cannot guarantee that the premises are true. Instead, as Hughes and the other authors in this volume note, what will convert people, or better, what will transform this world is when we remember what kind of creatures we are. We are not angels, we are humans. We need narrative and beauty and morality. Christianity will be seen to be true when we can demonstrate with our lives that it is also good and beautiful, that it is more indicative of the way things really are.

Therefore, we need a lived apologetic in the same way that we need a lived evangelism. We need a lived understanding of what it means that God exists, that he created the cosmos out of nothing, that he is Tri-personal, that he exists in the relations of Father, Son, and Spirit, that the Son became Incarnate, died, and resurrected. How that looks will have variations for every individual Christian, but it will, at its heart, be revelatory about the true nature of reality, and not merely an attempt to “logic-chop” our non-Christian interlocutors. This is the kind of apologetic, the kind of life, I seek and often fail to live. Join me.

Sincerely,
David

Being a Catholic Evangelical

apologetics

Imaginative Apologetics

John Hughes

Previous Post

November 28, 2015

I Need Advent: From Ordinary to Extraordinary

Next Post

December 3, 2015 What Does It Mean To Be a Theologian

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Secular Age Advent Apologetics Atheism Beauty Being a Catholic Evangelical Being Catholic Being Deified: Poetry and Fantasy on the Path to God Blogging Book Reviews C. S. Lewis Catholic Imagination Catholic Social Teaching Catholicism Christmas Church Calendar Church Fathers Church Life Community Conferences Cosmology Creation Curdled Words Deification Distributism Easter Economics Education Epiphany Essay Extracts Eucharist Faerie Faeriean Metaphysics Fatherhood Films Folk Liturgy Food and Drink G. K. Chesterton Harry Potter J. R. R. Tolkien Jove King Arthur Language Lent Life Literature and Poetry Liturgy Medieval Theology Music My Publications Mythology On the Edges of Elfland Ordinary Time Ordination Parenthood Parish Patristic Theology Pentecost Politics Prayer Racism Radical Orthodoxy Restoration Movement Sacramental Ontology Saints Science Sex and Sexuality Sophiology Stories The Inklings The Radical Catholic Reimagination of Everything Theologians in the Church Theopoetics Thesis Research Uncategorized University of Nottingham What I'm Reading Writing

Select a Month December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz