BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Evangelical
- Why We Should Stop Admitting Syrian Refugees for Now
Why We Should Stop Admitting Syrian Refugees for Now
Last updated on: November 18, 2015 at 6:44 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds
Why We Should Stop Admitting Syrian Refugees for Now 2015-11-18T18:44:57-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
Leave some Christians in the East
If you love Syria, oppose radical relocation as a solution to the problems in Syria. The dream of a multiethnic, religiously diverse, free Syria must not be allowed to die through the barbarism of Daesh (the so-called Islamic State). Let’s not spend twelve times as much on each refugee we relocate in order to leave Syria cleansed of minority groups and moderate Muslims.
Apparently some, such as the National Association of Evangelicals, think the only reason to wish a moratorium on taking Syrian refugees into the United States is “fear.” This is, in fact, wrong. The United States should not take ten thousand more refugees for three reasons unrelated to irrational fears or even rational fear of terrorism.
Americans, like most free people, are willing to accept a risk to help other folk. All charity is risky, all loving acts can go wrong and we will not be bullied by the Daesh into doing the wrong thing through fear.
And yet brashness isn’t courage, and intending to love doesn’t always come out as loving.
Pious intentions on all sides of this issue might start a Facebook thread, but are not a way to make serious policy. Every Christian must help the poor, especially the refugee. This is a basic Biblical principle and so the argument amongst Christians is (or should be) how best to implement help for refugees.
I support a moratorium on this expensive sort-of-solution: relocation to a different hemisphere of a few refugees. I do not support ending help for refugees. In fact, nobody is calling for an end to aid to Syrian refugees. No ethical person supports sending refugees back to unsafe Syria or to the Daesh.
For the sake of argument, opponents of continuing relocation of Syrian refugees to the United States can accept two ideas (both debatable) and still oppose the present program:
1. The United States screens refugees very carefully and the odds of a terrorist coming in through such a program are very low.
2. The United States government has a moral duty to help the Syrian refugees.
Opponents could also assume absolutely pure intentions in all of the government agencies and non-profits involved in relocation and still oppose currently continuing relocation. While some may be motivated by ministry growth and the funding that comes with it, there is no reason to assume it is true of most.
Opponents can (and in this case should) reject:
1. Any opposition to helping refugees based on irrational fear of all forms of Islam or all Islamic people.
2. Any opposition to helping refugees based on racism or ethnocentrism.
In fact, opposition to moving Syrians a hemisphere away can and ought to be motivated by love of the Syrian people and culture.
Here are the three reasons I continue to oppose the United States continuing to take Syrian refugees:
It is an expensive form of tokenism.
Bringing ten thousand people to the United States evidently takes extensive background checks and years. The people we are bringing are already in safe havens. We are moving them a hemisphere away, not because no place else will take ten thousand people closer to home, but as a token gesture. It costs as much as twelve times more to bring a refugee here. Why bring them here? What is gained?
Such gestures do real harm as they make it look like we are doing something, when in fact we are doing a very expensive next to nothing.
It creates a permanent diaspora of Syrians that weaken the outlook for a better Syrian state.
The Obama administration has helped create a human rights disaster in Syria. In part, this was because we imagined that nothing would be worse than the Assad regime. The Assad regime is bad, but Daesh is far worse.
Syria will not be a great place to live for some time. If Europe will take millions of refugees on a semi-permanent basis, then why wouldn’t reasonable Syrians wish to leave? A few are even being told that they might win the global relocation lottery and come to the United States of America.
Where will that leave Syria? Do we wish a Syria with no Christians left? Do we wish a Syria where all religious minorities are gone? Do we wish to forever distort Islamic culture in Syria, one of the great centers of Islamic thought, by creating a diaspora.
Let’s encourage solutions that care for those in danger, provide them basic safety and human dignity, but do not put them so far from home that they will never return. Will a refugee coming to the United States of America ever move back to Syria?
It encourages putting off a real solution to Syria.
Syrians need to solve the Syrian problem. The great powers (especially the United States) have meddled in internal Syrian politics and now another power (Russia) has directly intervened. Russia, France, and the United States need to set up a safe haven for Syrians, a green zone, and help Syrians stay in Syria.
Nobody wants to see human suffering, but the root cause of the suffering is in Syria. Fundamentally, the goal is to end the need to help refugees, not create more refugees.
As a side note, even if we accept that there is a very, very small chance of a terrorist coming with refugees, there is not a zero chance. Proponents of bringing Syrian refugees to the United States have promised (in effect) that no terrorism will be tied to the refugees. If this promise were to be broken, and surely the news gives us reason for some rational concern, it would set back helping refugees for decades.
When I have made these arguments, thoughtful people have criticized my view on three basic grounds. Again, I do not believe most of those who favor moving people to the United States hate Syrian culture. Good people agree on the goal, but are arguing about the means.
Let me summarize the criticisms and respond.
Camps are bad and tend to become permanent.
Yet I say: camps are bad, because they should be temporary. They give hope to restoration. Permanent camps point to on-going failure to resolve root causes.
Nobody wants a refugee camp. Nobody rejoices when people live in them. They should exist temporarily. When they do not, then it points to an ongoing problem. Perhaps we must eventually give up on Syrians being able to go home, but must we start there now?
Let’s spend more money on safe havens near Syria and not encourage Syrians to leave for wealthy states . . . and a cultural colonialism that will make it unlikely that they will ever return to Syria.
No political will exists to do anything different. We might as well help somebody as nobody.
Yet I say: no political will exists, because we have fallen into “two positions.” We are either for “bringing refugees to America” or against “helping terrorists.” If we don’t attack the polarization nothing will change.
I think Christians, especially in politics, need to propose an alternative. In the past some GOP Presidential campaigns have had workers who read this blog. If some still do, then may my little voice by one to urge an alternative. Some GOP candidate should propose taking the aid now being funneled to the ten thousand and multiply it by ten to help more refugees during this moratorium. Some candidate should propose setting up safe havens next to or in Syria that will keep Syrians near home so they can return when, God willing, Syria is safe again.
If no voices in powerful positions are raised with a better idea to help the present crisis for the God-loved Syrian people than shipping a tiny number of people to the United States, then our government has reached a crisis.
Your position provides cover for fear mongers and racists.
Yet I say: I will not give up hope for a better dialog on this issue yet.
I take this charge very seriously and so should all people in favor of a moratorium.
There are Arab haters on all my social media feeds. On a monthly basis, racists attack something I write on social media. In the inflamed circumstances around the Paris bombing, maybe an argument for prudence is badly timed.
As a result, Evangelicals who favor a moratorium for relocation of Syrian refugees must reject fearmongering and racism directly. Obvious truth: if the ten thousand come, as they almost surely will despite what most Americans wish, then I will rejoice in the good that will come of it. People will be helped and we all rejoice in this good thing.
Of course, we also spent millions getting fewer than ten Syrians trained to fight the evil regime in Syria. That was good . . . though more than a bit inefficient. I am not sorry for the trainees, just sorry for the waste.
I will not be sorry to have helped the refugees, just sorry for the waste.
Don’t we all wish our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren are be able to visit a Damascus where Christians still worship on the Street called Straight? Don’t we want to see the lively cultural exchanges that happen when a diversity of religious people live in a mosaic so complicated I cannot begin to name all of them? Don’t we love the Syrian idea enough to wish to save it?
Transplanting the Syrian nation elsewhere will leave a vacuum at the heart of the Middle East. People will move to fill that vacuum. Can’t somebody stop this cultural destruction before it is too late?
Of course, in this kind of “guessing,” I might be wrong. We know it is right to help the refugees. We simply are unsure what is the best way to do it.
Previous Post

November 17, 2015
Refugees: Prudence isn't Cruel and Tokenism Is Not Virtue
Next Post

November 19, 2015 Islam: For the Sake of the Gospel, Let's Tell the Truth
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized
Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
Who interpreted dreams for a Persian king about goats and rams?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Obadiah Daniel Hosea Joel
Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds
Related posts from Eidos
Yet I Love Her: History and the Church
The Iceberg is There: Verbosity Cannot Defeat Reality
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...
This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....
How the author of the world's best hymn...
I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...
Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...
What About the Trees? Another Living Parable
After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...
Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...
Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...
Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...
view all Evangelical blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In











