Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Ideological Man: Degenerate Democracy (4/5)

Ideological Man: Degenerate Democracy (4/5)

Last updated on: May 17, 2019 at 11:37 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

Ideological Man: Degenerate Democracy (4/5) 2019-05-17T11:37:31-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

No idea is so good an ideologue cannot make it monstrous. An ideologue turns a good into the good and so makes an idol of an icon: a false god for a window to God. Perhaps, however, there is an ideology that can liberate humankind in our generation.

Why would anyone wish to be ideological?

Marx proposed we cannot help ourselves. We are all nearly blinded by ideology. Marxism proposed an “ideological man” – governed by the assumptions of the elite of his particular age- “the product of the economic and political arrangements peculiar to a specific phase of historical development.”*

Ideology traps most of us into our own times and assumptions, so argument aimed at persuasion becomes unimportant. One finds whether a person is for the good ideology or against the good ideology. Those who can see better, who lack the nearsightedness of improper ideology, who see the direction history must head to achieve justice, need not waste time with the ideologically blind.

As Ryszard Legutko in The Demon in Democracy: the Totalitarian notes about ideology:

The concept vaulted to unprecedented popularity, primarily because it proved to be a most convenient tool in political conflicts: it allowed discrediting one’s opponent without entering into a substantive argument.

The job of the good politician is to inculcate by any means necessary the good ideology while stamping out the bad. Everything is judged by how it advances the ideology and nothing, not art, family life, or even entertainment is unaffected. Ideology is absolutist, like a religion without God. There is no external power that is accessible to us that can completely pull us out of the ideological conflict.

We are in a perpetual battle between those who “get it” and those who must be resisted because they do not.

The ideological man is thus both absolutely suspicious and absolutely enthusiastic. There seems to be no idea under the sun that he would not put into question and make an object of derision, skepticism, or contempt, no idea that he would not reduce to an offshoot of hidden instincts, mundane interests, biological drives, and psychological complexes. Hence he is likely to despise reason as an autonomous faculty, to downgrade lofty ideals, and to debunk the past, seeing everywhere the same ideological mystification. But at the same time, he lives in a constant state of mobilization for a better world. His mouth is full of noble slogans about brotherhood, freedom, and justice, and with every word he makes it clear that he knows which side is right and that he is ready to sacrifice his entire existence for the sake of its victory. The peculiar combination of both attitudes—merciless distrust and unwavering affirmation—gives him an incomparable sense of moral self-confidence and intellectual self-righteousness.

Marxism came with several ideological principles, though these were applied variably in different societies. Legutko writes that liberal democracy, the dominant political philosophy of the West, did not at first have much of an ideological edge. By the 1960’s, however, Marxism and the idea of class struggle came to the West. This revolutionary period targeted real injustices such as racism and colonialism. Instead of being content to end the manifestations of obvious injustices, an ideology that blamed the entire culture for the evils grew, especially in academia.

All traditional ideas, vocabulary, and Western systems were found not just to broken, but active evils. Utopia could come, but only if ceaseless resistance to the system and purging of evils became central to life. The targets were as varied as the societies of the West. Literacy, language, scientific methods, religion, traditional ethics, the very idea of the West are assumed by now to be hopelessly corrupt. Trying to clean up the system is often seen as doing almost as much harm as good, so that the job is (nearly) endless. One generation’s heroes will have to be purged as multiple ideologues continue to seek the idea liberal democracy. If Marxism had only the class struggle, there was now an endless fight on multiple fronts: sex, gender, class, religion, body shape, wealth . . . The greatest intellectual freedom in some circles became the ability to see new struggles. (See the militaristic imagery used in “class struggle!”)

There is no end to the struggle, the ability to find enemies.

The great good that is sustained in a liberal-democracy, as opposed to a socialist state, is that while the elite media and educational system are tempted by the totalitarian, great pockets of liberty still exist. The liberal-democratic regime was conceived in liberty and raised to greatness by law, so both liberty under natural law are natural to the liberal-democratic regime. The very stultifying and predictable nature of the totalitarians of modernity make such a return easier.

The artist can crowd fund, like the comix artist Doug TenNapel (@DougTenNapel) and bypass the gate keepers. The educational system that saddles students with debt to pay for administrative salaries while closing off intellectual possibilities can still be passed in projects like The College at The Saint Constantine School.

We still have the ability to say: this social change seemed good, but now the logic of the change demands these further, more terrible changes, perhaps we were wrong?

We can say “no” to some decisions in our liberal-democracy and “yes” to older ways because a sizable minority prefer them. Dissent to the new regime, just like the dissent to the old socialist regimes, can ask only to be left alone to see who thrives.

Read the book.

—————————-

* Legutko, Ryszard. The Demon in Democracy, page 113.

This is a five part series on this fascinating text: 1. 2. 3. 4.

Culture

On Books

Politics

Previous Post

May 14, 2019

The Temptation of Politics: Degenerate Democracy (3/5)

Next Post

May 16, 2019 God is Great as Opposed to Degenerate Democracy (5/5)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "forgive us our trespasses as we forgive"" mean in the Lord's Prayer?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Pray for revenge We should forgive others Ask for wealth Hold grudges

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »