A Just Man Cannot Harm Anyone (Republic 17)

Last updated on: June 23, 2018 at 10:26 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

A Just Man Cannot Harm Anyone (Republic 17) 2018-06-23T10:26:25-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A just man cannot harm anyone.

That command seems impossible or at least Utopian: the kind of goo-goo idea that comes up in college discussions that cannot work in the world. Yet a Christian cannot just ignore the possibility this idea is true, since the Lord Jesus Himself said we are to love our enemies!

How can we love someone and cause them harm. In the West of the world, one of the first times an argument is made that a just man cannot harm anyone is in Plato’s Republic. A young man whose very name indicates his warlike character, Polemarchus, is talking to Socrates. Polemarchus is convinced he should harm his enemies if he is going to be just. Socrates asks him a some questions and Polemarchus has the courage to answer them honestly:

But is it right for the just person to inflict injury on anyone?

Of course. He is right to injure bad men who are his enemies.

But what about injury itself?

If you injure, say, horses or dogs, will you not make them less excellent animals?

Yes.

Does that not also hold for human beings? If you injure them, will they not be less excellent as men?

Yes.

Is justice a human excellence, Polemarchus?

Yes.

So if you injure a man you make him less just?

I guess so.

Now consider musicians or riding masters. Are their purposes achieved if their students become less musical or less able to ride horseback?

No.

How about the just man? Will it be his purpose to behave justly in order to make other men less just? Will the virtuous behavior of good men make other men bad?

No.

Then the good cannot corrupt any more than heat can generate cold or dryness water. If justice and goodness are the same, then the just man injures no one. It is his opposite, the unjust man, who inflicts injury on his fellows.

There are obvious ways for Polemarchus to avoid the conclusion. To give one example: he could deny that a physical injury, say punishing a criminal makes him less just even if it makes him less excellent as a human. One might decrease physical excellence in order to increase mental excellence.

He does not make this move, I think, for two reasons. First, Polemarchus consistently views harm of any kind as immoral. Justice is a human virtue, excellence, but so is physical health. He does not think good can follow from bad. There is a great deal to be said for his unwillingness to do something harmful that good may come! Second, Polemarchus does not separate physical harm from mental harm: harm is bad, all sorts.

Obviously, one can physically restrain a “madman” in order to keep him from doing even greater harm to himself. Both Socrates and Polemarchus were not pacifists. A citizen can defend his city, but the goal is to reduce harm to the enemy, not to do harm.

This sounds like a tricksy way of getting to harm enemies, while piously sounding like one is helping them. Sometimes, tyrants will do harm while pretending to “help.” However, both a doctor and a sadist inflict pain, but the doctor does so to heal and the sadist to harm. The example of a riding master is a good one. The horseman must flourish if the riding master is to suceed. He might push the student, causing some growing pains, but only to leave the student permanently better off. He cannot make the student permanently less.

Good, virtue, cannot corrupt, only heal. Justice is always medicine, never hemlock.***

For a Christian, the priority is always to help each human flourish. We must do as little harm as possible: acting as doctors more than judges. Our actions will not be weak, but just because love and justice are compatible.

God help us.

———————————————-

*I begin an informal summer reading of Republic using Scott/Sterling (a new translation for me). Part 1. Part 2. Part 3. Part 4. Part 5. Part 6. Part 7. Part 8. Part 9. Part 10. Part 11. Part 12. Part 13. Part 14. Part 15. Part 16. Part 17.

**I have no idea how much of what I know is just Professor Al Geier filtered through my eccentricity. Here is to you Al!

***This is consistent, perhaps, with some executions of some criminals, but nobody following the argument will be eager or hasty to try this radical cure. Like chemo, the cure is almost worse than the disease, but not quite if an imminent hanging concentrates the mind of the condemned. (Samuel Johnson)

Culture

On Books

Previous Post

June 20, 2018

Hope: Good Indeed (Summer in the Republic 16) With Bonus JANE EYRE!

Next Post

June 22, 2018 The Rich and Powerful Or Their Parasites Wish to Redefine Justice (Summer in the Republic 18)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who ruled as king when Jesus was born?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Caesar Augustus Tiberius Herod the Great Pilate

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »