Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Those Irritating Academics (Questions from Crown 2!)

Those Irritating Academics (Questions from Crown 2!)

Last updated on: November 17, 2017 at 10:29 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Those Irritating Academics (Questions from Crown 2!) 2017-11-17T22:29:46-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Students help me grow.

Spend enough time in graduate school and it is hard to write a normal email. “I am coming to the party” turns into “The party, perhaps, is a state of affairs for which there is a possible world such that I am there. LOL.”

The key absurdity is the desperate LOL. Academics, like teachers, struggle with humor. Somehow, someway, we hope that our inability to write a sentence in standard English will be covered by the almighty “just kidding.”

It does not.

No group suffers more from our inability to communicate than college students. Here is a question from a bright honors college student:

I am wondering what your thoughts are on making Christian intellectualism approachable. Intellectuals have a reputation for being above the rest of society and hard to communicate with unless you are an expert in a common field. Popular intellectuals tend to be shallow or strongly opinionated. How would you make intellectualism something that can be shared with the masses without dumbing it down?

Anybody who works hard, accomplishes something, and is good at what they do, runs the risk of becoming snobby about success. Try getting fitness advice from an athlete. If they ever had the problems the rest of us have working out, they have not had them in years, forgetting the struggle in the success. This does not have to happen and a good athletic trainer who knows her stuff can communicate well, and sympathize with learners and might help the more schlubby amongst us achieve at our lower level.

The athletic example points to a problem when it comes to “intellectualism.”*

When it comes to working out, nobody (especially not me) resents being at a lower level. We know. We admit it and we are ready to change. It is much harder when it comes to intellectual activity. We take that personally and if we do not think as well (on an issue) as someone else, that can be delicate for the teacher or mentor.

It is hard in both directions to accept that in some areas, I might have a good understanding of an issue, even having read quite a few books, but lack an expert’s touch. For example, I read and think about politics a good bit, but defer to my colleague Dr. Stacey who has mastery in that area. He has been put through the grinder of academic training at University of Virginia on politics and there is no easy substitute for that experience. I push back when we disagree, but with deference to his expertise.

This can be hard, especially when my reading has been very extensive, yet self-teaching comes without the sharpening or the techniques taught in a discipline. An outside voice can be valuable, but for every time one of us who are outsiders to a discipline shouts “the Emperor has no clothes!” there are multiple instances of shaming ourselves without intending to do so or even knowing that we are.

Nobody has mastered more than a corner of a discipline, but if I don’t have the math to follow the arguments in physics, then dismissing some view in physics based on a lay level book I have read is foolish. In the same way, people who dismiss modern forms of a philosophical argument that depend on modal logic should know modal logic. This has practical results. I try not to give opinions about areas where I have not done some study and to temper my forcefulness to the level of study I have done! If I do not deeply study an area, I try to go with the consensus of experts.

Notice then that when an expert in an area speaks, we face three problems. The academic (God help us!) might struggle with pride or find making difficult subjects accessible hard. The non-academic might have a pride problem too while also struggling to understand a new subject area.

Too often everyone gives up, but that is deadly in a Republic. We need experts, and that will mean the academic and intellectual life, and we need outsiders keeping us honest.

How do we do this?

First, we have to try and that means knowing our limits. Just because I went to college and have graduate degrees does not make me an expert. Appealing to my opinion as a PhD on an issue like global warming would be fallacious: a false appeal to authority. I am not an authority in that area at all . . .not one tiny bit.

If a person went to college years ago, but is not a regular reader, then skills may have faded. I was in decent shape in college, but that does not say anything about today!

We all have strengths and weaknesses and my mathematically inclined friends help me as I try to help them in the humanities. Our goal as people is to master and enjoy as much of the truth as we can while also recognizing our different levels of competence.

Second, people with a strong background in an important area either should find people to recommend who do communicate to others or learn to do so themselves. All of us need experts to vote as citizens, to be involved as church people, and live our lives! Do to others as you would have them do to you . . .the man who can tell me how to fix my car, based on years of training, perhaps should treat my thoughts on his philosophy the way he wishes I would treat his thoughts on my driving.

Christians have an advantage here, though we do not use it often. People are not valuable as people because of what they can do or know. My plumber is a better plumber than I, but that does not make him a better man than I. Father Richard has more theological training than both of us and we should pay attention to him when he speaks on that subject, but he would be the first to say that this does not make him “more human.”

We can have different roles without losing our common value as people. Our rights come from God and are based on our humanity!

Assuming the best, all of us listening and learning in humility, we will still make mistakes. Experts, even with an overwhelming consensus, can be wrong. Going with an ill-informed hunch sometimes will work, but not usually. We cannot be discouraged by this . . . the wonder of growing into adulthood as a society is that we make mistakes.

Because experts speaking to the general public have to simplify and have biases just like any other opinion, I try to read multiple experts to get a take on an issue. When I am speaking as an expert, I try to qualify what I am saying and point to where my simplifications might be deceptive. (Take an expert seriously when he says- “It is more complicated than that. . . “)

Sometimes an informed citizen will do her homework and end up disagreeing with the consensus of experts. This is safest if she finds a significant dissident community in the field. Still even then, she should be cautious. We tend to look for experts to confirm our prejudices . . . it is always good to let an uncomfortable opinion sit in our minds for a good long time . . . to make sure we are not just rejecting the better argument, because we do not like the conclusions.

All of us should live a thoughtful life and in some area most of us will become experts. If we recall that, then the Golden Rule will cover and tolerance will cover the inability for some of us in academia to write standard English!

———————————–

*See the first piece in this series I expressed my dislike of the way some (NOT this questioner) use the term “intellectualism.” I will use it to answer the question, but would prefer “academic” or “thoughtful” life.

If I get to them all, there are twenty-two questions. Here is: 1, 2.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

November 12, 2017

Being “Intellectual” Is Not the Answer

Next Post

November 14, 2017 Plato to the Rescue for a Lost Culture (Questions from Crown 3!)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which tribe first accepted David as king after Saul's death?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Dan Judah Ephraim Benjamin

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »