Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

eidos

You are Biased! –Questions from M

Last updated on: June 12, 2017 at 8:51 am   by John Mark N. Reynolds

You are Biased! –Questions from M 2017-06-12T08:51:50-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Satan_Appearing_before_God_LACMA_M_optWhen it comes to literature, art, or human things, I learn by loving first and criticizing later. As I begin to read Cormac McCarthy, my first feeling is aversion. Son of God, the first novel I read, is dark and contains many wicked deeds. Yet friends say there is something more to McCarthy and I should think harder, listen, and read more.

That is good advice and helps me see beauty where a smaller me could not. I will keep reading McCarthy.

Human creations are complicated. They tend to contain darkness and light, truth and falsehood, beauty and ugliness. That is obvious, but what is harder to do is to see why people love something that is, in the end, something I find more dark than light, more false than true, uglier with little beauty.

This does not always happen. I have yet to finish Triumph of the Will, a movie my film friends say is very beautifully made (on a very wicked topic). I just cannot.

Still, my default position when approaching religions is to look first for truth, goodness, and beauty. I read as if it is true and only criticize when I grasp a bit of it.

I reject the “all ways lead to God.” They might, but only if one keeps thinking and gets to Jesus. Christianity is true, best I can tell. That remains true even if many other religions contain truths, beauty, and goodness.

With all this in mind, I come to this question from my faithful interlocutor M*:

  1. Would you generally believe the religious claims made in books written by people who are adherents of the religion? Would you think that such books may be biased? Would you think such books may be biased if these books specifically said they were written so that others might believe?

Yes. yes, yes.

That is overly cute, but I do not wish M* to guess my opinion in all the explanation that follows!

One never wishes to commit the genetic fallacy.  I try to examine the claims, ideas, and arguments of a work without trying to guess the motive. Even if I am being sold (a car or an idea), I judge the claims and not the motive since not all salesmen are cheats and not all altruists are right!

Books by adherents, lovers, of a religion are just the sort I wish to read. Napoleon said of battle: “You commit yourself and then you see.” So it is with a view of reality. It is hard to see if you are not part of that view.

I love to read the witness of atheists about why they are atheists, why I should be an atheist, and why my views are wrong. I measure the arguments, check the evidence, and enjoy the passion. They see something good and I gaze hard to see what that something is. Often I find a love of reason and as one who worships the Divine Logos (Word/Logic), that is admirable!

Are such testimonies or books biased? They are and I try to account for it. For example, I look for whether such texts include information difficult to their cause. When the Gospel has a woman eyewitness to Jesus’ resurrection, that is interesting to me. The Gospels also leave sayings of Jesus that sound as if Jesus is saying the end of time will come right at the destruction of the Temple. The copies of the books we have preserve such statements or other “hard sayings” of Jesus that critics from ancient times until now preserve.

These characteristics are found in other ancient religious documents and I am always glad when I find them, but I don’t need them. I assume I am being “pitched” any way . . . and such passages may be left to help the pitchman sound sincere. If you work sales, you learn not to oversell!

So I am left examining the claims, the beauty of the message and text, and the evidence for what the authors are saying. I treat Plato the same way, since I assume he too is selling something.

I might assert that every book is biased, so I trust the ones who tell us the bias up front, but I do not have to go that far. Easier to say this: some books that appear to be “unbiased” are, the appearance of objectivity is part of the sales pitch, so even those books that appear to be unbiased have to be examined on their merits. Some might be, some are not.

Who cares?

Let’s read, love, and see. When I first read the Book of Mormon, I loved the text. (It should be mandatory in all schools as the best selling American work of all time.) I get why people love the book. There is much truth in the Book of Mormon, much beauty. Sadly, however, I cannot be a Mormon. Why? Having seen why someone might be, I am convinced that it is wrong in its central claim to be another Testament of Jesus.

That is a very serious problem.

Still I do not reject the central claim because the book is “biased” or written by a believer. That is fallacious and unproductive. Opening one’s mind to other points of view in religion has not made me less sure of Orthodox Christianity, but more sure.

And I have also learned a thing or two. If you read the Gospels, examine them, love them, and then cannot accept them, I can only discuss your objections with you. If God and the Gospel cannot persuade, then my testimony cannot. Still, perhaps, I can remove some confusions that have obscured truth, goodness, and beauty and God will come as you take and read.

Perhaps. I pray God does.

——————-

*M is a non-Christian that sent me 55 questions early this year. He  has asked that I not reveal his or her name. I will write as if “he” is a male, but this is for convenience. I do not know if I will get to all his questions. Here are questions 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 17, 19, 23, 26, 27, 28, 34, 35,  37, 39, 44, 47, 54 , and 55.

Apologetics

On Books

Previous Post



June 8, 2017

I believe: Justification Required (Usually) -- Questions from M

Next Post



June 10, 2017 Why You Can Taste and Never Hunger Again --Questions from M


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul say is a mystery that has been hidden but is now revealed, which is Christ in you?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The power of God The hope of glory Eternal life Salvation

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »

Related posts from Eidos

Evangelical

Classical Education Must Teach Us to Make the...

Eidos

Evangelical

The Iceberg is There: Verbosity Cannot Defeat Reality

Eidos

Evangelical

One Weeping Icon at Christmas is Enough

Eidos

Evangelical

The Power of Dissenting Societies: A Thought

Eidos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube