Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Follow the Truth, Best You Can– Questions from M

Follow the Truth, Best You Can– Questions from M

Last updated on: June 7, 2017 at 8:25 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

Follow the Truth, Best You Can– Questions from M 2017-06-07T08:25:14-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“If Jesus’ dead body were wheeled before me now,” the older woman said to me, “I would still believe.”

I talk enough to have been asked by a relative if I had ever heard of anyone talking themselves to death, but I did not know what to say to this nice lady. What did I say? I don’t recall exactly, but something like: “Then you have something, but you do not have Biblical faith.”

Faith is not believing a thing despite the evidence.

Faith is a gift from God that seeks understanding. If you think you have seen “God” and received “faith” but understanding does not follow, then you have found the wrong god. Spiritual experience is as easy to misunderstand as any personal experience.

Too many Christian novels and movies may have helped create this confusion. One can have faith based on general evidence in a specific situation where things look grim. When facing the grotesqueries of daily life in the twenty-first century, there are situations that make no sense to me.

“Why did that happen to her?”

I do not know.

I do have prior evidence and good experience in the general goodness of God. I can rest in God and seek understanding. After all, if there is decent reason to believe a good God exists, then the fact that in a very complicated, interconnected cosmos, the reasons for everything are not obvious to me, little me, is not very surprising. A man sees God, hears God speak, and walks with God. As with any person, we can come to know the character of the person we see, hear, and experience. This experience helps in times when my small understanding faces a big cosmos.

This is reasonable trust and not irrationality.

M* asks:

If one does not find the evidence that supports Christianity convincing, how would one choose to believe Christianity is true anyway?

You cannot.

At least you cannot, if by “convincing,” you mean you do not find the evidence at all convincing or that there is not enough evidence about the most important ideas.

Why this quibble? Because, in general, I agree that we should follow the evidence, but this is never in any part of life as easy as the slogan makes it sound.

Christianity has many beliefs, some more important than others. The less important depend on the important. Jesus lived, died, and rose from the dead. Jesus is God. Those are very important ideas, but most will depend on an experience of the living Jesus, the living Word of God. If Jesus is not there when we call out to Him, then all the arguments in the world are not very useful.

I do not, however, first believe in Jesus based on historical evidence or arguments. I believe in Jesus, because when I cried out to Him, He was there. Based on this good experience, I think I asked (as I grew older): “Is this right? Have I understood things correctly?” In fact, at one point for reasons of my own, I tried to talk myself out of Christianity, but reason kept me there.

My experience was real, Christianity worked as an explanation for it. There were good enough reasons, not to talk me into something, but to support my experience against being deluded or crazy!

Notice this does not always work: wishing (as I have said in the last question) is not enough.

I always told my children that if they went to Narnia to please tell me. I would presume they were telling the truth and not that they were liars. My plan was then to investigate their claims as quickly as possible . . . but sadly, this did not happen. Much as I wish that someone would go to Narnia, I have never met a person that has been or even has claimed to have been.

I cannot believe in “actual” Narnia.**

You should not choose to believe a thing for which there is inadequate evidence. On the other hand, if I met a person, fell in love with her, and then she were to vanish, I might risk a great deal, do a great deal, and defy a lot of odds to find her. That does not seem irrational, but human. Love demands some risk.

As a result, if you have met Jesus, and learned to love Him, and find intellectual problems with parts of Christianity (and you will!), then you have a good motivation to look for answers. This is not irrational, but conserving a good experience. Why not? Why start with the assumption that every time there is a problem the worst possible outcome (it was all a fraud!) is most likely?

My own experience is that when I fall in love, it is almost surely with something.*** When that something or someone gets lost, I look. Love demand this and it is a joy to follow.

The mistake people make about philosophers is in assuming we want to argue you into something. We do not. Philosophy, at least as I was taught to do it, is clarifying our ideas, examining them, testing them, and then doing the best we can. If you find a truth, a philosopher tries to live it.

Obviously, in future questions we will talk about that external evidence, but it is important to see its role. My experience with the person Jesus strikes me as no more “internal” than my experience of you M*. In all cases, I experience through my mind and could always be deluded about the external world. In fact, I am more sure that Jesus exists than you exist M*! (I have only emails . . . and as many a Nigerian businessman has shown . . . emails are not much evidence.)

Yet note, I believe in order to understand . . . and my belief in you M so far fits my experience, does not harm, and is quite jolly.*

If I am wrong, what a pity! And if they were to find the body of Jesus, and best evidence exposed the ancient fraud, I would seek, not atheism, but a better explanation of Christianity for the reality of God in my life. I can only report to you that I have met Jesus, so far I find the external evidence to my internal experience adequate, and leave the rest to God.

Meanwhile, we both can follow the Logos wherever He leads!

—————————-

*M is a non-Christian that sent me 55 questions early this year. He has asked that I not reveal his or her name. I will write as if “he” is a male, but this is for convenience. I do not know if I will get to all his questions. Here are questions 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 17, 23, 26, 27, 28, 34, 35, 37 , 47, 54 , and 55.

**Thoughts on fictional worlds here.

***See Plato in Symposium.

Apologetics

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

June 4, 2017

Confessor

Next Post

June 6, 2017 God the Moral Relativist? --Questions from M

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who conquered Jerusalem and made it his capital?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Hezekiah Saul Solomon

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »