The Ancient Discovery of Common Theology to Save Our World (Guest Voice: Dr. Eric Holloway)

Last updated on: June 1, 2021 at 9:59 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

The Ancient Discovery of Common Theology to Save Our World (Guest Voice: Dr. Eric Holloway) 2021-06-01T21:59:09-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What if we turned from academic theology to “common theology?” Would we find intriguing ideas in the great conversation of a diversity of theology minds? Dr. Eric Holloway thinks so and he wishes us to think with him.

Dr. Eric Holloway has a great texts degree, a MSc in Computer Science at the Air Force Institute of Technology and a PhD in Computer Engineering at Baylor University.

Dr. Holloway:

What if theology were a knowledge based discipline like philosophy,
science and mathematics? Today, if one cracks a theology textbook,
there is much discussion about religious scriptures, systematic
analysis of the scriptures, and delineation of doctrine. However, it
is all very distant from our common theology.

What do I mean by common theology? To understand, we have to first
look at the sibling of common theology: common philosophy. The origin
of philosophy in Greek culture was very tied to everyday life.
Socrates talked with common folk in the market place. Plate wrote up
Socrates’ ideas in engaging dialogues. In most of the dialogues, the
participants dealt with questions that applied to everyone’s life,
such as whether it was better to be good or powerful, the ultimate
purpose in life, why celebrities don’t know what they’re talking
about, and so on. Very nitty gritty and relevant. In this down to
earth setting, Socrates was able to investigate profound questions
that reached beyond our world. This is what I mean by common
philosophy.

What if there were likewise a common theology? Common theology is a
way of talking about whether there is an overarching intelligence
guiding the universe, and what its nature might be, in words people
like ourselves can understand. In fact, this notion of a common
theology started Socrates on his philosophical investigations.

In Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, Socrates states he was unsatisfied with
the intellectuals of his day and their explanations. When asked why a
man walks, the intellectuals would say because his leg muscles pulled
his bones. This was not the sort of explanation Socrates was looking
for. Socrates wanted to understand the purpose behind the man
walking. So, when asked why a man walks, Socrates would say because
the man wished to reach a destination.

Purpose implies mind, and this convinced Socrates there must be some
ultimate mind behind the world’s organization. Yet the intellectuals
who proposed an ultimate mind, such as Anaxagoras, left Socrates
unsatisfied. This motivated Socrates to seek out answers for himself,
and thus western civilization was born.

Let’s imagine common theology exists. In fact, we don’t have to
imagine. Common theology exists whenever anyone starts thinking about
the ultimate nature of our world for themselves. One of the common
conclusions people reach when they start wondering about such things
is similar to Socrates’ conclusion: there must be an ultimate mind
responsible for our world. The only minds that we know of are our
own, so it makes sense to see what we can figure out about the
ultimate mind based on our own minds.

Within our minds we note at least three basic things. There is the
mind itself, the ideas in the mind, and the emotions. Within our
human minds, these are different parts of our mind. Yet, that makes
us imperfect, since that means the parts have to come from somewhere
outside of ourselves. We don’t create our own minds. We are only
partially responsible for our ideas and emotions, and they often seem
to have lives of their own.

What does this say about the ultimate mind? If the ultimate mind also
has ideas and emotions like we do, then the ultimate mind cannot be
truly ultimate, since its ideas and emotions have their own existence.
Along with the ultimate mind, there also has to be ultimate ideas and
emotions alongside the mind. From this perspective, we end up with a
world populated by many sorts of ultimate things, as many ultimate
things as there are ideas and emotions, governed by an ultimate mind.

Yet this sort of notion does not quite make sense. We originally set
out to achieve an ultimate understanding of our world. The core
intuition is there should be some sort of theory of everything, some
origin for it all, some unifying principle. Instead, we ended up with
even more complexity than when we started, with way too many ultimate
things, and even more questions as to where all these things came
from. This way of thinking ends up being exhausting.

One solution people have tried is to say all the complexity is an
illusion. The only thing that really exists is the single mind. This
answer makes some amount of sense. At least it preserves the simple
origin that we set out to discover. At the same time, I’m pretty sure
the kitchen cabinet door that keeps jabbing me in the head exists.

Yet another way is to just insist there is an ultimate mind, and say
its nature is completely beyond our understanding. This approach also
has merit. Obviously, the ultimate mind is really great compared to
ours, and it is obvious we cannot understand everything. However,
there is a difference between completely not understandable versus not
completely understandable. Just like we cannot believe in square
circles and married bachelors, things that are completely not
understandable do not mean anything.

A better solution is offered by one of history’s greatest common
theologians, a medieval monk named Aquinas. He states the ultimate
mind is not different from its ideas and emotions. They ideas and
emotions are all the same fundamental thing as the ultimate mind.
This is because the ultimate mind is existence itself, so its ideas
and emotions cannot derive their existence from anything outside of
the mind. In this way, Aquinas explains there are three distinct
things in one ultimate mind, without falling into the problem of too
many ultimate things.

Aquinas’ idea is groundbreaking in the history of theology. Previous
approaches to common theology ended up stuck in the dilemmas above
that ultimately lead to too many ultimate things. Aquinas’ idea is
the first understanding of the ultimate mind that did not result in
too many ultimate things. However, today his breakthrough is not well

understood. Most modern theologies do not recognize the dilemma of
explaining how the ultimate mind can create the world, while preserve
the reality and distinction of both. Instead, modern theologies
reject either the ultimate mind, or insist it is totally alien to our
own self understanding.

These theological divisions lead to major disagreements today. If we
were to hop on board a time machine and bring Aquinas’ brilliance back
to our day, this would go a long way to resolving the disagreements we
face today. The first step in our trip back in time is to recover the
joy of common theology.

Apologetics

Culture

Philosophy

Previous Post

May 31, 2021

Celebrating Memorial Day: God Bless South Korean, Vietnam, and other Cold War Vets

Next Post

June 2, 2021 Both Voices: Hearing All of Humanity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did fire from heaven consume to prove Elijah's God was real?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The temple A golden calf A chariot Sacrifice on Mount Carmel

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »