WandaVision: A Provisional Review

Last updated on: February 1, 2021 at 11:16 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

WandaVision: A Provisional Review 2021-02-01T23:16:13-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image used for review purposes.

WandaVision is difficult to review, because almost anything one says is a spoiler. This is not so good as when one hears the summary and guesses what the show might be about, assuming one is not in seventh grade, one is likely to be right. This is not even Buffy second season for complexity and story arc so far.

And yet the first three episodes were risky video, a slow unfolding of the central concept, and so there is hope. Perhaps things are not as obvious as four episodes make them seem and some really risky writing will happen.

A person can watch three episodes, be given ‘clues,’ build up hope for something really complex only to have the fourth episode combine wooden acting with exposition to tell you that the simplest explanation for everything you have seen is the answer. Not since the third Matrix film have I felt so let down by a storyline. The first Matrix combined so many clues, visual, verbal, evoking all kinds of possibilities, but the next two films showed that most of the visualizations were wasted, thrown in for “depth,” and the story a bit of juvenilia.

The premise is so promising: two excellent Avenger characters, played by strong actors, go through a stereotyped sitcom for each decade. Seeing “Wanda” (Elizabeth Olson) and Vision (Paul Bettany) ham it up in the set of the Dick Van Dyke Show and then becoming groovy in living color is good clean fun. Having knowledgeable MCU fans shout out characters they recognize from the Marvel films makes for viewing a raucous party and allows a second watching to “catch things.”

Sadly, the acting on the show is very uneven as less prominent characters from the feature films are given more lines than they can handle. You can hear some of them not using contractions, because the script didn’t: think emphasis on the not in did NOT. You should NOT.

The worst part is, however, the writing. So far the plotting confuses introducing fan favorite clues, actors, and MCU self-referential lines with a plot. The first three episodes are a clever parody of television sitcoms from the represented decades, if a bit obvious in jokes and earnest not to offend the average viewer who has never seen much black-and-white. Mysterious things happen, but in our house when they happened, someone, just about everyone, could explain what likely was occurring. We had it all confirmed in episode four.

We are not looking for Shakespeare in the MCU, but we could at least get Captain America: Civil War level plotting. Instead we get a lot of stale: color appearing in black/white/sepia was shocking in the 1930’s and a metaphor in Pleasantville, but overdone. Maybe the writing works better if you know nothing of the history of television or film. The kids, mayhap, have not seen all this before now. As a result, plots can roll down predictable lines, with lots of goodies for MCU fans, and all will be mediocre, but jolly.

This is, however, the hope I still harbor. Maybe what we have “learned” in the first four episodes, and relearned in case we missed the first visual clue, and then had explained to us in a speech in case we missed all the visual clues, will turn out to be a double-fake. Perhaps, like the best seasons of Angel, the arc will seem unendurably immoral or obvious, only to mix us up. Dawn in Buffy did that for us: “Oh no,” we cried. And then “Joss Whedon is a god of writers.” If you have not, watch the story arc of that season unfold and marvel that such a thing was made.

I enjoy comic book shows and if not a fanatic for the MCU (as I am for some other worlds such as Star Trek), I have been on the ride for decades. I have even taught a session of college or two based on the better bits of the product. This show is fine, watch it if this is the kind of thing (like my family), you like. This review, such as it is, turned out more negatively than I wish it were because the lack of risk taking, the failure to be clever, is so sad. There are excellent actors here, much money spent, and so far the plot is “clever” if arch references to other product is clear, but not smart.

The show is certainly well crafted, Disney polishes her productions, with the effects, sound, and lighting holding up to any feature film. The cast is delightfully diverse without sermonizing: would that real sitcoms of the various eras had done so well. Television has improved!

I really like WandaVision, but I almost loved it until episode four when Exposition and Obvious sucked all the fun out of the show. And the quips. So many quips.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

January 28, 2021

The Sad Sack

Next Post

January 30, 2021 Education and Truth in Advertising

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many chapters are in the book of Hebrews?

Select your answer to see how you score.

15 10 16 13

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »