Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

eidos

On Reading Plato: Thoughts for Starting

Last updated on: October 2, 2020 at 4:11 pm   by John Mark N. Reynolds

On Reading Plato: Thoughts for Starting 2020-10-02T16:11:46-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/436105

There must be someone out there who loved reading Plato right away, but I didn’t. When I read Republic, the entire book seemed needlessly complicated and full of obscure arguments advanced by an unlikable cast of characters: Socrates and his horrible students. Yet the problem was me, of course. Republic has held up for millennia because it’s good, whether I like it or not. Plato is beyond my judgments of him.

Pause for a minute and consider how obvious this truth is. Plato helped found philosophy. Much of what we believe is either something that he discovered or another philosopher’s reaction to his errors. No sane person can question his greatness or importance. Americans, however, aren’t used to reacting to art with humility.

Say my first response to a movie is, “I didn’t like it.” This may be true. I’m entitled to my likes and dislikes. But my emotional reaction to the film says nothing about its quality or importance. Sometimes a film is very good, but over my head. Sometimes I am simply in a bad mood. My mood doesn’t change the movie.

Yet when was the last time you heard someone say, “I bet that was a great movie; I just didn’t get it”? Probably rarely, if ever. Most Americans have been taught that our feelings about a work of art are the most important facts about it. But this is dangerous, especially when it comes to something from another place, culture, and time.

It’s easier for us to see this truth when we consider people who are different from us. When it comes to people, most of us recognize that we must overcome any prejudice or sense of “strangeness” that we feel and learn to love them as they are… or learn to learn to love them!

What I’m suggesting is simple: we must learn to treat strange-feeling human art, like Plato’s dialogues, with the same kind of humble respect with which we treat other people.

Perhaps the most liberating thing I have learned in a lifetime of reading books is that I must find what is lovable in a work of art first, before I criticize it. When I learned to come to Plato with humility, a whole world of joy opened up to me.

So, here’s my advice: Just read Plato, trustingly. Don’t be controlled by anything I say, and don’t give too much weight to your first feelings. Just read Plato, as he is. Three guidelines might help get you started.

Remember that Plato writes dialogues. These texts are works of dramatic fiction. Never forget this as you go. Plato is not describing an actual conversation, but a literary one. Imagine that you are reading a script for a play taking place in your mind.

Argue with the text. Dialogues are written precisely to get you to respond to them, like a play would. Don’t just agree with what you read and take notes. Plato wants to bore you, make you mad, get you to react. And he’s good at it. Speak back to the text as if you were there with Socrates’ students. If the students seem dull, suggest what they should have said. If Socrates seems wrong, tell him so. Plato wanted his writing to feel alive.

Notice that the dialogue is both simple and remarkably complicated. Plato was a world class genius; people like CS Lewis, Dorothy Sayers, or Tolkien spent their lifetime trying to understand him. He is capable of writing so that anyone can understand some of what he is saying, while also writing with a depth and care that is startling.

Here is a simple pattern for reading a Platonic dialogue:

On any given day, we get to join him.

Apologetics

On Books

Philosophy

Previous Post



September 30, 2020

Just Because We Like it Now: the Cautionary Tale of Abraham Cowley

Next Post



October 2, 2020 Envy


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Jeremiah was known as the weeping prophet.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »

Related posts from Eidos

Evangelical

Classical Education Must Teach Us to Make the...

Eidos

Evangelical

Rooted: Why Classical Education Needs Community

Eidos

Evangelical

The Old Words Are Helpful

Eidos

Evangelical

When the Center Holds: A Tribute to My...

Eidos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube