Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Come On Man: How to Tell Hard Work from a Waste of Time (Euthydemus!)

Come On Man: How to Tell Hard Work from a Waste of Time (Euthydemus!)

Last updated on: October 25, 2020 at 10:11 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Come On Man: How to Tell Hard Work from a Waste of Time (Euthydemus!) 2020-10-25T22:11:42-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Loving wisdom can be hard work or you can dodge anyone who might change your mind, dodge the arguments, and super-saturate in materials that support what you wish is true.

”Come on man.”

ESPN has a segment called “Come on man. . .” There we see football players who should do something, but inexplicably do not. Imagine running for the end zone, then looking back, and so getting caught, the football knocked out of your arms: the coach turning salty seeing his player do a Lot’s wife. “Come on man,” run for the end zone as fast you can and worry about the opposition during your touchdown celebration.

Acquiring wisdom is hard work and so we are tempted to take short cuts, especially if they are lucrative. I was reading a very bad Christian book recently, one all the rage, that is full of cherry picked historical examples and bad argumentation. Heaven forfend you ask questions while reading: “What about this other case?” “What if this position being attacked is correct?”

The book assumes that the Evangelical academic establishment grifters, running dying colleges funded by usury charged to duped parents, will commend the sentiment while the tuition paying parents will miss the book or (best of all!) take it seriously. After all, the style is fetching, the title cunning, and the opinions popular in the demographic marketed. This book is not doing the hard work of dialogue, but is “eristic.” There are many words, some footnotes (!), references, and the person is a Christian college academic who probably actually believes the tricksy equivocation on display.

“Come on, man.”

How can the rest of us, those who want wisdom and the truth, wherever the truth leads us, know when someone is just marketing the latest intellectual fad? Sincerity will not help as the academic sub-culture is perfectly capable of ginning out scores of “scholars” with inter-disciplinary degrees full of Great Pumpkin level sincerity.

First, the person will engage with critics who are qualified. If the writer is criticizing left-of-center Christians, then he or she will find the most effective spokesmen of that position.

Second, the arguments will consider the best case for the opposition. Once I made an argument, carefully took care of all the texts that could falsify my take on Plato, only to have my professor ask: “Why would anyone assert this thesis in the first place?” I had been clever, eristic, but not dialectic. I had not given my own ideas a real challenge.

Plato wrote the Parmenides, still one of the best attacks on his views. Too often, we argue for the “home team” regardless of the merits. Winning is everything.

Third, any long discussion will try to clarify what the opponent means by the language they use, and not try to trip them up on what they say. I once ran into a guy who was harassing a person for whom English was not their first language. They had one idea of what “animal” meant and that idea was simplistic. As a result, the skeptic was able to confuse them, make them look bad, and “win” the discussion. This was sad. They were a “talkie-man” and not a lover of wisdom. They might have won, a lucrative skill online and in courts, but wisdom was far away.

Fourth, the discussion/book/film/argument will not merely advance an establishment friendly thesis that ignores the best critics. The “establishment” can vary from person to person. Some want the favor of a tiny, eccentric out group. They wish to be king of the Cultists. Others wish to be big fish in big ponds and so find a way to fit what they believe into the service of the Great Masters.

The dialectic goes where the student and the teacher go. The eristic man follows the money.

Clarity takes time.

In any discussion, there is a need to clarify terms used so that everyone is making the same claims. Being “understood,” clarity, is hard and can take a long time, much discussion, and frustration. We know what “knowing” is in common talk, right? We do, but when we get to harder questions we have to distinguish between shades of meaning and usage.

The lover of wisdom is willing to be wrong. The lover of eristic is not, to which the lover of wisdom can only say: “Come on, man!”

——————

From a devotional for The College program at The Saint Constantine School on Plato’s Euthydemus.

Apologetics

On Books

Philosophy

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

October 23, 2020

Being a Real Cannibal? A Journalist's Tale

Next Post

October 25, 2020 The Talkie Man? Beware the Eristic! (Euthydemus)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I include truth, righteousness, the gospel, faith, salvation, and the Spirit. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The shield of faith The armor of God The breastplate of righteousness Spiritual weapons

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »