Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
What’s new? In praise of hepcats. (Euthyphro)

What’s new? In praise of hepcats. (Euthyphro)

Last updated on: September 2, 2020 at 8:00 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

What’s new? In praise of hepcats. (Euthyphro) 2020-09-02T08:00:40-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When I ask my wife what’s new, she generally responds: “What’s new pussycat?”

Tom Jones, the singer or the novel, she says are both hot and cool.

Plato’s Euthyphro? Her reaction is different: informed but substantially less passionate. Why?

The Platonic dialogue recognizes that truth cannot be both hot and cool, that being a contradiction*. In fact, the dialogue insists on being merely immortal: the book of the hepcat. The opening question is:

What’s new, Socrates, to make you leave your usual haunts in the Lyceum and spend your time here by the king-archon’s court? Surely you are not prosecuting anyone before the king-archon as I am?**

The dialogue will center on piety. Should a son prosecute his father? If he must do so, then should he be as cocksure as Euthyphro is? After all, some moral choices are hard: two important goods are in competition and the demands of both cannot be honored. We should honor our parents, but also seek justice for all. When the desire for justice conflicts with our duty to parents, a good person will pause, agonize, and then seek justice for everyone.

Only a moral lightweight, a pussycat or tomcat, would be light about the choice. These are folk driven by immediate passion at the expense of the greater good. There is nothing wrong with passion, God help those who do not know passion. Instead, the difficulty is prioritizing the passion today against the passion of yesterday or tomorrow. If a man throws away his shot, then future chances cannot be used!

A hard choice that is taken lightly shows that the person choosing is morally bankrupt. They may choose correctly, but they miss the weight of the other side. When we make hard decisions easily, we show that we have not understood one side of the moral argument. Suppose we (generally) claim that good parents should get respect AND we assume that no matter who is guilty the unjust must face justice. Too quickly, easily, with little reflection, throwing our mom and dad to the wolves of justice shows that we were not serious about one moral claim. A hard choice is easy only if we do not feel the force of one of the choices.

Leave aside the “jerk for justice,” that Euthyphro has become. What is more troubling is that Euthyphro is more interested in what is “new” (for the pussycat or the tomcat) rather than what is just, good, or beautiful for both. The ways these eternal truths are manifest can change, we should look to those differences, but the deep truth endures.

Socrates has come to the courts, where he is not usually found, and Euthyphro wants to know why. What is new?

Nothing is new except the incidentals: the just man has once again been hauled short by injustice. Nothing is new about the hepcat being persecuted by the squares.

Socrates has known himself and so never comes to a place randomly or merely because that place is “new.” He goes where he must, where he wishes, because this is the right thing to do. If you ask why he is there, then you do not know Socrates. For a so-called friend to ask this question shows a defect in friendship. If you know Socrates, really know what is happening in his life, then you will know why he has been forced to be in that ugly place. Socrates is on trial: on his way to execution by the Athenian state.

There is nothing new about injustice, nothing new about why Socrates would be on trial. Good men and women are always put on trial by a tyrannical state for standing for the good, truth, and beauty.

Beware a mistake that we might make. The trendy seeks “what is new,” yet the reactionary is no better when he pretends what is old is always superior. If the dialogue were to begin: “What has been? What was normal yesterday?” this would be just as useless and dangerous. The new usually is part of old patterns and the old has elements (like Socrates being in court) that are new. Why is Socrates in court? That is a fair question, not because of the novelty, but because of the nature of the event: being in court is dangerous!

We should love what is happening now, because that is part of reality. We must not forget what has happened, because the past cannot change. One need not be a square, a reactionary, to get it. Instead, one can be the hepcat: the person who is cool with all the coolness from centuries past to millennia future.

Euthyphro is a dialogue between the pussycat and the hepcat. The cool person of today, now, is like the hepcat, the person who is cool from age to age, in some ways. The pussycat will seize the day, but miss the centuries, while the hepcat will embrace all the goodness, truth, and beauty of all ages. The prude, the narrow, the square will miss what is happening now and what happened then and what will happen tomorrow.

What’s cool pussycat?

Rather: what’s good, true, and beautiful hepcats?***

——————————–

*And yes, I am guilty of an equivocation. Tom Jones would use “hot” and “cool” in a different way that Plato. That’s the fun of an informal essay: making small verbal jokes. (Adult children say: “. . . very small.”)

**Plato. Plato: Complete Works. Euthyphro 2. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.. Kindle Edition.

***I am thankful to Professor Al Geier for this term. Hope is certainly a hepcat.

On Books

Previous Post

September 1, 2020

2020 is OVER! Happy New Year!

Next Post

September 3, 2020 Learning from the Wise: Thanks Orlando Ferrell

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which church tradition celebrates the Feast of Epiphany as "Three Kings' Day"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Quakerism Eastern Christianity Western Christianity Baptist

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »