Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
The Sad Case of a Dated Education? (A Debate)

The Sad Case of a Dated Education? (A Debate)

Last updated on: August 31, 2020 at 5:59 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

The Sad Case of a Dated Education? (A Debate) 2020-08-30T23:32:00-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/436105

Dr. Holloway is a working engineer and not a professor, though he admits to professing things. He criticized a certain style of argument which caused another friend, Jeff Williams to worry he was being attacked. Mr. Jeff Williams, sometime UC Chicago grad, with an education from a better era, was concerned and so responded. Williams has a style that is fortunately inimitable and unfortunately jejune.

Holloway is a happy soul who enjoys the fray and so was glad to respond to William’s latest. If the rhetoric is tough, the good will is tougher. This is the sort of pointed, clear, and open dialogue that any Christian Republic must encourage. We are confident that if one follows the discussion, the divine Logos, where it leads, all will be well. Any good seminar at the College at Saint Constantine, where both Williams and Holloway have standing invitations to speak, can get more heated!

When you have seen the True Light, the heat of earthly disagreements is not so much. Sadly, one can also have learned in a different era and so end up with an education that research outran and so the credibility dies before the credential. We must stay fresh.

If you are a sometime reader of this site, note that hard and academic discourse can take place without violence in a liberal order. As the Christian super-majority in the United States sustained that order (however imperfectly) for two hundred years, so we must avoid any temptation in this year to end that open dialogue!

I will happily publish any response from Williams.

Here is Dr. Holloway:

Jeff Williams, proving the point

I am sure they teach many fine topics at the University of Chicago,
but from Jeff William response reading comprehension and logical
argument are not among them.

First, my article is not about him. But, if he thinks the shoe fits…

Second, if UoC had done its job, Jeff should know that past
performance is no guarantee of future results. Science has made
tremendous bounds understanding the physical world, but has made zero
progress understanding the mind. All physical explanations come up
short. The most promising, artificial intelligence, is a complete
dead end. Just because a man can get closer to the moon by climbing a
ladder does not mean he can climb a ladder to the moon!

Instead, Jeff is left with empty appeals to the grandeur of his UoC
classes whenever it comes time to make a substantive point. In fact,
this is probably all UoC and other such institutions can offer for way
too much tuition, since they’ve eradicated any coherent foundation for
a logical worldview. In engineering, we call this a self licking ice
cream cone.

————————

Background on the Discussion (Link Loaded Summary, Very Skippable): What is going on?

If we wish to follow the Logos where He leads, we need to listen to critics, especially those with interesting things to say. Jeff Williams is a critic of metaphysics. A University of Chicago grad, he agreed to present his argument and I have posted it here unedited (except for some formatting and the title). As result of his rejection of metaphysics, he rejects objective moral law as an illusion.

Mr. Williams previously argued that Athens has no need of Jerusalem, which contributes nothing good to Western civilization. I responded and enjoyed the interaction immensely. Mr. Williams has taken the time to discuss Martin Heidegger, a philosopher not much in favor when I was in graduate school. I have enjoyed reading more Heidegger (alas in translation). As usual, I allowed his post to stand without comment for a time and now here is a response. Mr. Williams suggested to me that I had not gotten him right, so it seemed decent and in order to let him respond. I suggested that Mr. Williams has ended up looking for a pony, because he has found a pile of LEGO blocks shaped like a pony.

Mr. Williams finds my response lacking, so I joyfully invite you to follow the argument where it leads. In this case, it leads to a sadly dogmatic physicalism (or materialism) that sees “gaps” or problems where there are none. We also learn that having a bad history of the philosophy of science can lead to some bad conclusions. Williams has come back to straighten me out. Sadly, I am not straightened out by this response, since I do not think Mr. Williams makes arguments. On the other hand, Williams is my friend, because he is honest, forthright, well read, and unafraid to speak what he thinks is true.

This is vital to the dialectic, the very basis of our finding the Logos, the Lord Jesus. My take on his fascinating assertions comes in two parts: one, two.

Mr. Williams felt I had done him wrong so he wished to summarize his credentials and his case. The first are impressive, the reader can decide on the merits of the second. Our reader or so will be delighted to discover that I will only have a brief response to this extensive rebuttal by Williams.

Apologetics

Culture

Philosophy

Previous Post

August 30, 2020

An Impulse Totally Wrong: A Danger of Reading Old Books

Next Post

September 1, 2020 2020 is OVER! Happy New Year!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the name "Adam" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Earth Firstborn Breath of Life Man

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »