Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Allow the Diversity of Life

Allow the Diversity of Life

Last updated on: July 24, 2020 at 12:39 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Allow the Diversity of Life 2020-07-24T12:39:58-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Every aborted baby looks alike, but every child allowed to live becomes absolutely unique. Abortion crushes liberty for a single choice- it ends possibility with the cruel actuality of murder.

Roe should be overturned because by judicial fiat, it hallows killing the innocent as part of our Constitution. In a just society there can be no right to do evil. Not every evil should be illegal, but no evil action should be hallowed as a constitutional right. It took years and much horror to remove slavery, another soul crushing immorality, from the Constitution. The court imposed a culture of death on the nation contrary to our oldest traditions, to our best moral impulses, and to the gradual expansion of liberty and justice to all Americans.

Liberty always loses when the weak are harmed for the benefit of the stronger. Siding with the strong over the weak has always been an American vice, from our treatment of the First Nations, slavery, to abortion.

Though few wish their children to grow up to be abortionists, abortion gains some social acceptability because it became associated with the noble cause of women’s rights. Women should have power over their own bodies. Women often face cultural prejudices, stereotypes, and barriers based on sex. Abortion is presented as a tool for social equality, yet this moral mistake gains force from the truth that our society makes pregnancy and childcare hard for women. Solving these barriers to family life would help create a culture of life.

Yet being associated with good causes does not remove the moral odium of abortion. Putting roses on the table while you serve a fetid meal will not improve the taste, though it might distract the guest for a time. Associating the moral good of women’s civil equality with abortion does not change the immorality of abortion. If anything, it harms the good cause by falsely associating it in the public mind with the moral evil.

The right to control over one’s own body ends at the other person’s body. Here, advances in technology have given Americans a window on the womb and knowledge the authors of Roe did not have. The unborn child is not merely an organ of the mother’s body. Science is at war with the reasoning of Roe. The unborn child is unique genetically from the moment of conception. Nor does history suggest that social equality for a group is best gained by suppressing a different group. When the state is given power to declare one group of humans unequal before the bar of justice, it does not restrain itself for long. Poor Whites in the old South tried to advance by supporting the oppression of Blacks. Some tried to gain white women’s suffrage by abandoning the cause of votes for Blacks. At times Black activists in the late eighteenth and early twentieth century abandoned the cause of First Nations. These strategies did not secure what they sought and made them complicit in a great evil.

Of course, abortion will not end if it is illegal. Other forms of killing continue though they have remained illegal. If abortion is the taking of innocent human life, then that murder should be illegal..

Some assert that killing a baby is no worse than refusing to give a family a government welfare check. Being born into poverty is not good because it limits possibilities, but being killed is a good deal more limiting. Abraham Lincoln managed to overcome “regressive” social welfare policies and rise from poverty to the White House, but an aborted Lincoln would have never helped free the enslaved or saved the Union.

Asking us to wait for some Utopia where every child is born into “better” conditions is an excuse to tolerate evil. Nobody is sure of the best way to end poverty or if poverty can even be ended in a society that is otherwise livable.

Liberals and conservatives don’t take a different moral position: both think it wrong when children are born into stifling poverty. They disagree about what to do about it. The argument is about the best and appropriate means to an ideal end on which all agree.

The abortion issue is different. The disagreement is more fundamental. Pro-life voters (a group including both liberals and conservatives) wish to protect the unborn while those in favor of Roe do not. Pro-Roe voters may personally be opposed to abortion, but they must not think the unborn child is fully human or their failure to grant her the right to life is unconscionable.

Given this fact, why then should abortion regulations be left to the states?

There is a good pragmatic reason and also a reason related to our form of government.

Pragmatically it recognizes that only a “states-rights” solution will allow any civil progress on this issue in the immediate future. Effectively ending abortion in states with a pro-life consensus, such as Louisiana or Utah, will be better than the current situation. There is no reason Utah should be forced to have the same abortion policies as California.

As a federalist, I am also opposed to allowing the government in Washington the last word on everything of importance. The expansion of federal power at the expense of the states is another evil of the last fifty years of court decisions. Each state has different laws regarding the definition of murder and manslaughter. Each state is allowed different penalties regarding such crimes. There is no reason to make abortion a “federal” crime and good reasons for a federalist to oppose it.

When Roe is overturned, God willing, the battle for human rights will continue. It will be fought out in each of the fifty states. Legal abortion will be opposed by a broad coalition of secular and religious Americans and moral truth will prevail.

I have confidence that in such a fight the American people will see the wisdom of Ronald Reagan who said: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. . . . We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life — the unborn — without diminishing the value of all human life.”

*A version of this piece originally appeared on the Washington Post.

Culture

Politics

Previous Post

July 22, 2020

Christ Above All or The Integration of Faith, Values, and Learning: A Midnight Cry (Part 7)

Next Post

July 24, 2020 Global Anglicanism Finds a Voice

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the longest verse in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Romans 8:28 John 3:16 Esther 8:9 Psalm 119:105

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »