Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

eidos

Timing is Everything (The Discussion of Philosophical Motives)

Last updated on: June 13, 2020 at 4:13 pm   by John Mark N. Reynolds

Timing is Everything (The Discussion of Philosophical Motives) 2020-06-13T16:13:39-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

On Charity with a (fairly) Uncontroversial Point for Christians 

Christ commands us to love our enemies. This includes those who disagree with us, though as Christ’s life shows, this does not prevent calling out bad ideas. Jesus Christ could speak a “woe to you” without cutting off grace and mercy. The command to love enemies implies at least two things. First, we cannot love people we do not understand. Failure to take the time to see what people with bad ideas really believe, as opposed to easier-to-refute versions, is a failure of charity. Lenin was a monstrous tyrant*, but he also was a subtle thinker. If one opposes Leninism, as one should, let us find out what Lenin said, understand it as carefully as possible, and then argue and work against the ideas.

Second, I am (generally) a small government conservative, (often) fond of federalism. Some who disagree will not accept conservative support regarding practical solutions toward the poor. Since I agree with most of the two and one-half billion people in the world who are Christians (mostly non-white, mostly female) on certain ethical issues, some will not accept our help in medical services, education, or humanitarian aid.

Those likely to agree with me in those ways see the problem of letting people starve, fail to get hospital care, or learn to read based on less immediate but important disagreements. Often I have seen progress in environmental issues slowed by a failure of a presenter to confuse why one should be for a good and helping.

On Selective Timing

I was once on a plane going to an educational program in a nation just recovering from Communist tyranny. On the plane with me were numerous young adults from a religious group with whom I have serious theological disagreements. These disagreements are of eternal importance. This group was focused, however, on helping very poor children, some of whom lived in sewers, live decent lives, get an education, and be kept safe.

I wished them well.

Is it true that there is a danger, even a great danger, that bad theology will be believed due to the good works done by these kind people? There is. That should motivate people with my theology to do greater works than these with repentance. If the true church is known by the works the Holy Spirit inspires, then the immediate needs of these people in God’s image mattered. After all, if a person is allowed to die, there is no chance for philosophical or theological growth. Sadly, I have known people who will not support fine ministries like Star of Hope for ideological or religious reasons. This happens on the left and the right. If nobody better (from my philosophical and theological perspective) is as effective in my local community, then being an ally on discrete projects is warranted. 

When race issues come up, many people bring up the motives, theology, or philosophy of people engaged in making change. This is a fine thing to do overall or in an academic context as failure to notice differences can lead to later actions where an ally can no longer be an ally. For example, if someone generally rejects the free market, I am unlikely to accept all the solutions they will propose. On the other hand, systematic racism is real and a present source of evil.  The bulk of the traditional Christian African-American community reports serious problems in my political community and in the nation. If this suffering and concern includes persons of color people in my Church, then my first thought should be to work for immediate change.

What can we do? How have we failed our sisters and brothers? What can be done tangibly, immediately to address those concerns?

Also essential is to be still, read, listen, and learn. After all, classical Christian eduction is dialectical! What if my politics are wrong? What if I have misunderstood important issues on the culture? When there is time, then we should consider those questions and only then pose alternatives whose focus is not to stop thinking and acting about racism, but providing alternative solutions. Meanwhile, we should ally whenever we can and in times of intense pain work everywhere we possibly can, ally whenever we can, to bring change.

For example, banning certain police tactics, dealing with an inability to fire bad officers, and support for communities that for decades suffered government imposed evil policies are issues that can unite most Americans. These can be fixed making as many allies as possible.

Most importantly, if one is not working, proposing solutions, or acting, then raising philosophical objections to particular actions is like the Leninist who preferred people starve than get charity from a nun like Saint Elizabeth. 

Make a plan, do work, support people who are doing work with the ideas that you find palatable, or be still during a crisis. Where to draw the line, when to start discussions and disagree mightily is a hard question. Generally, this should occur when policy is being made at a corporate or government level. At all times, common goals, the good where there is agreement, should be kept in mind. When one must oppose a group absolutely, say the Soviet Union, one must make plain that the problem is not a spread in literacy (“If only there was more illiteracy. . .”), but the horrors of the regime and the gross failure of the system to do what it claimed to be able to do.

Meanwhile, a Christian should be kind, make allies where possible, and work (as one can) toward the common goal of the beloved community.


*On Lenin, I am learning from the new biography “Lenin: A Biography” by Robert Service. If Churchill, righteously anti-Communist, could ally with Stalin, a brutal tyrant, to defeat the more immediate problem Hitler, then a conservative has good reason to suspect she or he can ally with almost anyone to defeat a discrete and great evil!

Culture

Politics

Previous Post



June 12, 2020

Christ through the Holy Spirit Proceeding from the Father Makes All-Wise Fishermen (For the Season of Pentecost)

Next Post



June 14, 2020 Ballet, Education, and Bad Philosophy


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Why did Jesus wash His disciples' feet?

Select your answer to see how you score.

To show humble service They asked Him to Tradition only To clean them for eating

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »

Related posts from Eidos

Evangelical

Yet I Love Her: History and the Church

Eidos

Evangelical

Vain Repetition

Eidos

Evangelical

The Iceberg is There: Verbosity Cannot Defeat Reality

Eidos

Evangelical

Silence and Jollification

Eidos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube