Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Ten Rules for When You Do Not Know an Area (How to Avoid Bigfoot without also Being Duped by Group Think Experts)

Ten Rules for When You Do Not Know an Area (How to Avoid Bigfoot without also Being Duped by Group Think Experts)

Last updated on: May 8, 2020 at 9:32 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

Ten Rules for When You Do Not Know an Area (How to Avoid Bigfoot without also Being Duped by Group Think Experts) 2020-05-08T09:32:29-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We are in a pandemic and the experts do not all agree about what we should do. So what do we do? What sources can we trust?

Sometimes intellectual gadflies are Socrates, most often they are just carrying a plague of disinformation. How can you tell the new thing God is saying, in John the Baptist or Jesus of Nazareth, as opposed to the grifter false prophet making profit on “words from the Lord?” When you are not an expert, how do you know when to trust the experts? Experts are. . .human and have interests and group think just like all the rest of us.

Yet cranks are also human and though we should begin believing people, our epistemology should begin in trust, we cannot assume every dissident is correct. Bigfoot is not, though I wish he was. Skepticism, an invaluable tool in our mental kit, applied to Bigfoot leaves nothing worthy of belief. That’s sad but not uncommon.

Different extraordinary events happen all the time, but any particular extraordinary claim is often mistaken.

How should we live in pandemic time?

I ask due to this email from a very brilliant former college honor’s student who is tempted to “want to know everything!” This desire is both good and bad. We should want the truth and nothing but the truth so help us God. However, we all have limited intellectual capacity . . . by Divine design. Humankind must live in community. We need each other. It is not good for a man to live alone! As a result, the desire to know everything personally creates the false autonomy that tyrants believe they have. We need each other, we need people we can trust.

So how can we know, when the community is split and our lives are on the line? Our brilliant yet curious chum:

I had a question for you- As you can imagine, I have always been pretty fascinated with news/world events/politics/philosophy/research/conspiracy theories . . . This has proven pretty hard for me during this Covid era. I am seeing so many different articles and stats literally contradicting themselves and I JUST WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH. . . . However- I wanted to ask if you have any news sources, articles, thinkers, doctors, journalists, etc that you trust in this time.

Maybe the answer is there are no answers and I just have to keep reading multiple sources to get glimpses of truth and wait to see what happens.

All that to say, any sources you have been turning to in this time for information? Quite frankly I don’t know who to trust so I am turning to the spiritual and intellectual leaders in my life that I do. I also imagine if I am struggling with this as a (generally) healthy minded individual. . . there are many others that are struggling. . .

This is a great series of questions. Do not ever just take expert opinion, but do know that (usually) expert opinion is correct (or the closest thing to correct we have). I try to follow a few rules.

I. Start your quest for truth with relevant experts. Assume they are right.

With Covid, I began with the CDC. Since they span administrations, there is a possibility that they are hacks simply carrying on group think from one administration to another. (This is not probable, but possible!) As a result, I started with the health departments in a state like Ohio, dominated by a Republican; Texas, friendly to the administration; and New York, not at all friendly to Mr Trump.

What did they have in common?

What they had in common, was likely to be just so. The idea that the Ohio GOP, Texas GOP, and New York Democratic establishment are all in cahoots is possible, but very, very, unlikely.

II. See if there are multiple competent dissidents.

A way to fame and academic fortune (long term) is to be a competent dissident. Particularly with our response to this pandemic, there is “click” fame waiting for the man willing to dissent. Are there multiple people with competence in the area dissenting? If not, then the people who control the cameras are puffing dissenting opinions for clicks and views.

There are lone dissidents, but very rarely.

III. Give weight to arguments against self-interest.

If a person is saying something at a cost, then listen carefully. The virologist who does not take the establishment line may have something to say. The Democrats who wish Biden to win, but who agree with the Trump CDC deserve special weight.

IV. Never confuse “science” with ethics or politics.

Science cannot tell us what we should do, only what the outcomes are likely to be. How do we measure risk to life with risk to mental health in a lock down? Science cannot give us values. Find trained ethicists, theologians, and philosophers to suggest what is the best balance between one outcome and another.

Science can tell us how the world might go, the philosopher how it should go. Do not trust either without verification through Socratic dialog.

V. “Follow” the world, the flesh, or devils to see if there is another motive.

What is someone getting for their opinions? All of us are getting something. The “establishment” has lures, but so does the fringe. Many people will believe crank ideas so to be the brightest person in a dim room. The grifter (establishment or dissident) will often tip off the motive by selling something. They will oversell surety and demonize the foe.

Avoid the person who will risk nothing for the truth they claim to proclaim.

VI. Boring things are oft true.

When I was in tenth grade, evidence forced me to the conclusion that the Bolshevik had murdered Anastasia. She did not escape. Atheist regimes rarely miss their victims once they have power or so history teaches us.

For every duckbilled platypus, so dubious, but real, there are several fairy photographs. Believe if you can, then if you wish to believe, challenge harder. Generally, the boring is true.

A person is born of a virgin, does miracles, is killed, and raised from the dead. Given His life, the resurrection is what we (should) expect. The boring is most often true.

VII. Ignore those who will not dialog in good faith.

The crank will claim that nobody will listen to them, but become shy when asked to debate or argue their beliefs. The intellectual scammer will not persist. He will repeat old arguments, refuse to engage critics in appropriate forums. Oddly, he often will claim suppression of his ideas, but then grow shy about responding to critics.

VIII. If someone seems like a nut, pause. They might be.

Nuts might be genius misunderstood, but mostly are nuts. A sure sign of a nutter is a person who cannot stop attacking “those” people. They have nothing positive to say, but keep grinding away against their foes. You know a nutter when the sum total of their writing is angry, overly confident, and only appealing to those who already agree.

IX. Ask: “What if I am wrong?” Minimize risk by the virtue of prudence.

Always ask: “What if I am wrong?”

What is the worst outcome of your position if you are wrong? Minimize extreme bad outcomes, maximize moderation. We hate the virtue of prudence in this radical age and this part of the problem. The truth, as Proverbs and Aristotle understood, is somewhere in the “do least harm” area.

This is not to moderate between opinions, but outcomes. If I wear a mask, what harm? If I do not, what harm? What if I am wrong? What is most charitable to my neighbor?

X. Be intellectually kind and listen to other people. Judge with the judgment you wish applied to your most “extreme” idea.

Kindness, intellectual charity, is too rare. My intellectual life owes so much to atheists, people in other religions, those who (I think) are wrong. As a result, I pause before I issue a jeremiad. Jeremiah could wax angry, because he loved his people. The jeremiad from Jeremiah has weight, because Jeremiah loves us. Sadly, most of social media consists of the jeremiad against those we hate.

This is bad.

Instead, let us practice charity. What are the arguments? Where is the data? Look up the footnotes or claims. I have discovered that most of the time grifters and frauds are revealed quickly, since they misquote or misunderstand what they say. When someone says the Middle Ages is obsessed with demons and points to Dante, go read Dante. You discover that most of his work says nothing about demons and even his book on “hell” has fewer demons than you would imagine!

Ignore the intellectual grifter.

So it seems to me. Start with the CDC and then compare with the health departments in a “red” and “blue” state. See what they have in common. Proceed. In a broken world, we still might be wrong, but we will have minimized the risk. After all, nobody is damned for an intellectual mistake.Most of all be kind to one another intellectually. Do your best, moderate your claims to your surety, trust God, and be content to be right in Paradise.

Thanks for writing chum!

Apologetics

Pop Culture

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

May 7, 2020

In Which I Discuss the Constantine Strategy With Cool People

Next Post

May 9, 2020 False Prophets

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Christ" mean in Greek?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Chosen One Lord of Lords Savior Anointed One

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »