Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Reality and “Reason”- Give Reality a Vote

Reality and “Reason”- Give Reality a Vote

Last updated on: March 6, 2020 at 1:34 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Reality and “Reason”- Give Reality a Vote 2020-03-06T13:34:33-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Being sensible, we are all for reason and the sane wish to live taking reality into account. Fyodor Dostoevsky agrees, being imminently sensible and magnificently reasonable.

“If reality stands in the way of reason, so much the worse for reality.”*

A character in the novel Brothers Karamazov forces us to consider what to do when reason and reality appear to clash and cause conflict in our hearts and minds.

How could this be?

Imagine a court case where all the evidence points to the guilt of a person: Bob. Consider this: Bob is not guilty in reality. Other than Bob and the actual murderer, nobody knows Ivan is innocent and there is no evidence Bob is innocent.

If Bob is conscientious enough, reasonable enough, he may come to doubt his own memories. He may begin to worry that he is guilty.

The jury must convict Bob, but the jury is wrong.

Justice is blind and must be blind.

The court cares more for reason than reality, since reality is (sometimes) inaccessible. We know our judgment may be false, but must do the best we can. In the United States, we have (at least in principle) determined that we would rather err on the side of not convicting the innocent, even if the guilty are freed. We set the standard of evidence at “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Even then, we know that we might be wrong: reason (as far as it goes) and reality might clash.

Best Experience and Mystic Experience

Dostoevsky adds another element: our deepest experience. If we (personally) know a person and know them as well as a person can be known by another person, we might have a good reason to believe they were not guilty. Of course, we all know we can also be wrong here as well, but general character is evidence. This is why there are “character witnesses” in a trial. The brothers of Bob might know Bob so well, almost no amount of circumstantial evidence (also often wrong) would change their minds. Sadly, nobody else can have access to this experience with the brothers. After all, they might be lying or kidding themselves to save Bob.

No person can be sure and so we must live by faith: the best combination of reason and experience we can find. So Dostoevsky suggests it is with God, evil, and other issues. If we experience a good and loving God, then we will need more evidence for God’s non-existence or evil. Yet we must doubt our experience, or at least our interpretation of our experience, when that interpretation (or even experience!) is called into question.

So we must live a human life, with best reason and experience, certainly, but there is one other problem to consider. Nobody can know (other than God) the quality of our experience. Suppose, for a moment, the quality of my love for Bob, my friendship for him, makes it impossible to doubt. That is unlikely, but if we move to a mystical experience, more profound than any normal experience, then we should pause. One stands before the iconostasis and sees “the True Light.” This can be said, but not shared, in the deep quality.

We would live in the world with our reason, defending with accessible evidence, our own sanity or interpretation of the event. One bit of evidence is our experience, but this evidence to anyone but us will not be as serious as we must take it personally. The man who saw the True Light may not actually be able to doubt.

How should we then live?

I think we should live as best we can in the world.**

As far as we are in the world, we give reasons accessible to all and share our experience as a testimony to others. We act on reason and experience. We are like the jury: voting best we can in ways that we can share. We do not defy or deny any argument or any report of another’s experience. We must take those into account. There will always be a gap in certainty in our actions: acting only beyond a reasonable doubt, not beyond all doubt. This is faith in a practical sense in this life.

However, we also may have access to a deeper experience, a mystical one, that cannot be proven to others, but undergirds our life. We live by faith, a reasonable hope, in the world, but with the certainty internally of heaven. I have known some, very sane and sensible folk, who have lived by reason and experience in the world, who also had access to experience, beyond what they could share. This informed their inner life and that life counts!

This is the mystical faith that brings joy that surpasses external understanding.

—————————————

*Thank you faculty member Megan Mueller in the discussion in The College regarding The Brothers Karamazov for bringing some of this to the surface.

**I take this to be Dostoevsky’s view at the end of Brothers Karamazov, but if not the idea was inspired by my (wrong) reading of him.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

March 4, 2020

Nicodemus Oppie: Our Cowboy Poet

Next Post

March 6, 2020 On God and Mockery

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Hebrews teaches that the blood of bulls and goats can take away sins.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »