Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

eidos

Distinctions We Need in Hard Times: Intended versus Unintended Consequences

Last updated on: March 27, 2020 at 5:55 pm   by John Mark N. Reynolds

Distinctions We Need in Hard Times: Intended versus Unintended Consequences 2020-03-27T17:55:11-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We cannot talk intelligently about a crisis if we do not have the right vocabulary. To do the right thing, we need to be able to distinguish all the different parts of complicated problems that pop up in our broken world. One distinction is intention. Actions can lead to intended consequences, but sometimes there are unintended consequences. Generally, a person is not morally responsible for unintended consequences. Another helpful ethical category is active versus passive actions. To do a thing is different from not doing a thing!

Thinking more carefully naturally leads to questions. Here are two.

Doesn’t this distinction mean the powerful will demand that they be judged by intention and the harm to the powerless dismissed as irrelevant? 

 The wicked amongst the powerful indeed will demand such treatment and it is wicked. One thing I learned in West Virginia is that the powerful are no more wicked than the poor, but they have the power to make us do what they wish.

The poor are no more righteous than the rich, (see what happens if we are cursed to win the lottery), but we lack the power to do as much harm. When we have gone wrong, we mostly harm ourselves and a few around us (Lord have mercy!), but the rich can harm millions.

The saints with power and money can help millions.

The distinction matters, but anything can be misused.

No harm is irrelevant. Every harm is a matter of sorrow,  God forgive me. No bad thing is irrelevant to the moral calculus and must always be regretted.

Yet.

Yet.

Consider that in a complicated world goods can collide and sometimes we must choose to get less of one good to get the best possible outcome. We guess, we try, we are unsure.

We do what we can. Misusing good does not make the good less good, but the wicked ever more wicked.

Isn’t not doing a good and necessary thing often wicked? 

One person said this to me:

When a doctor tells a grieving child “I didn’t intend for your mother to die, I just refrained from doing the treatments that had a really good chance of saving her life.” Do you think that child is going to feel much better? How do the doctor’s intentions fill the hole in that child’s life? Please be specific.

God forbid that any doctor do this foul deed.

If a treatment had a good chance to save a life, then a Christian must act. We do not passively kill. However, if a treatment merely prolongs dying, there is a moral difference. If the patient will never get better, but will only die more slowly, that is not the same circumstance. Refusing a treatment that will not cure, but merely prolong suffering to reach a certain death by the same disease is morally different from refusing a treatment that had a “good chance of saving her life.”

Some passive acts may come close to murder and are ethically forbidden. If I know pulling this switch will save your life and I do not pull the switch, I am wicked.* If I know pulling the switch will merely prolong your suffering and not stop your death, then I may do or not do depending on your request.

No child should feel better if a parent is denied life saving treatment. Every child (and I know such children) does feel better if death prolonging treatment is refused.

In hard times like a pandemic, calm and reason are the solution, but panic and sloganeering are allies of the virus.

 

 

————————————

*There are complicated situations even here!

Apologetics

Culture

On Education

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post



March 26, 2020

Baseball Opening Day in A Very Hard Year: Hank Greenberg in 1938

Next Post



March 28, 2020 Follow Scientists on the Science, but NOT Necessarily on What To Do


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who cried at the tomb of Lazarus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Jesus David John

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »

Related posts from Eidos

Evangelical

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Eidos

Evangelical

Rooted: Why Classical Education Needs Community

Eidos

Evangelical

Classical Education: Discussion for Everyone

Eidos

Evangelical

Speaking Math: the Language of Classical Education

Eidos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube