Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Down with Argumentum Ad Snobbinem! (Guest Voice: Dr. Eric Holloway)

Down with Argumentum Ad Snobbinem! (Guest Voice: Dr. Eric Holloway)

Last updated on: March 1, 2020 at 8:38 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

Down with Argumentum Ad Snobbinem! (Guest Voice: Dr. Eric Holloway) 2020-03-01T08:38:06-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Some rhetorical devices come at a cost.

A recent series of guest posts aroused the intellectual irritation of Eric Holloway, a sometimes voice on Eidos. Dr. Eric Holloway has a great texts degree, a MSc in Computer Science at the Air Force Institute of Technology and a PhD in Computer Engineering at Baylor University.

He felt the guest poster has fallen into several bad arguments. He labels the lot of them argumentum ad snobbinem. With his usual wit, Dr. Holloway makes his case and we all will be better off heeding his advice.

Mr. Holloway:

I have engaged in numerous internet debates and a fair number of
academic discussions. I am always interested to have my views
challenged, but I ask one thing. That the challenge be intelligible,
so I can evaluate what the problem is with my own view, and learn
something new.

What sort of challenge is not intelligible? Snobbery.

What do I mean by snobbery? It is an appeal to authority, but with
the addition of condescension. The condescension hides the appeal to

authority, but an appeal it is nonetheless. Appeals to authority are
the least meaningful pieces of evidence, since they beg the question
whether the supposed authority is authoritative.

I see snobbery employed repeatedly to ‘refute’ a view. Snobbery comes
in three main categories: scientism, popularity, and chronological.

Now for some examples of these snobbery categories that I’ve encountered.

My field of expertise is computer science, and I am particularly
interested in whether artificial intelligence is possible. Not merely
practically possible, but whether the concept of artificial
intelligence is even logically possible.

The immediate reaction I tend to get to such a question is the
scientism snobbery. Due to scientific theory X, the human mind must
be some sort of meat computer. Hence, artificial intelligence must of
necessity be true.

Of course, then we must ask, why should we believe X, and why should
we believe this implies the mind is meat?

Next, I might introduce substance dualism. At this point the response
is popularity snobbery.

Substance dualism is apparently the least popular idea in the history
of philosophy, so there is no way it can be true. No self respecting
philosopher even considers such an idea. Except, for most
philosophers throughout history, such as Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas,
Descartes, etc.

Then comes the final snobbery: historical snobbery.

Everyone knows those old philosophers may have had good ideas back in
the day, at least better than the villagers worshiping the sun, but
philosophy progresses and those old guys have outdated ideas. So, the
fact they found substance dualism convincing is only because they
don’t know all the scientific facts we know today.

And herein lies the crux of snobbery’s problem: what exactly are the
facts and theories that have soundly refuted substance dualism and the
like?

As far as I can tell, there are none. There are handwavy references
to evolution, naturalism and scientific progress, but nothing
concrete. Snobbery is merely an intellectual fashion victim, without
anything solid to support its air of confidence.

So, I propose that we immediately dispense with any such snobbery, on
both sides of the debate. Go straight to the specific claims and
arguments that refute a position. And if there is nothing solid
there, we must be willing to consider we might be wrong. I believe
such an attitude is one everyone can agree on.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

February 27, 2020

“Pandemic” or Words That Frighten Us: Keep Calm, Carry On

Next Post

February 29, 2020 Don’t Panic! Educate!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian tradition is most noted for the use of incense and elaborate liturgy?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baptist Methodist Presbyterian Eastern Orthodox

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »