Some of Phil’s Last Reflections

Last updated on: November 24, 2019 at 5:43 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

Some of Phil’s Last Reflections 2019-11-23T15:11:56-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is taken from my thoughts at a conference on Phillip E. Johnson’s work following his memorial service.

Phillip E. Johnson never stopped thinking about what is true and so he never stopped thinking about and supporting what is called the “intelligent design movement.” He began to suspect that he would not personally see the broader culture move in the direction he favored, but he had hope because he thought truth would prevail.

As a philosopher who first met him at the end of a dissertation on Plato, the soul, and science, Phillip was a refreshing intellect. He did not prescribe to any particular theory, any singular solutions, though he supported sensible ideas that needed his support. He was not content to ask what he could believe or what might be jury rigged together to save other ideas. Phil always wanted to know what was true.

As I see it, Phil framed questions about whether any naturalistic mechanism or fully materialist theory could account for everything. Could one get ideas, numbers, consciousness, mind from matter by starting only with matter and energy in mindless motion?

Phillip E. Johnson looked at the proposed solutions, especially the overarching stories of so called “science,” and was not satisfied. As a product of the best schools, Phil had been told there was a solution or at least several likely possibilities. He saw what a lawyer is trained to see: a weak case too often built on intellectual bluster, bluff, and bullying.

As a theist and a Christian, Phil was not interested in squeezing theism or Christianity into that system. He doubted it was true! The proponents of the naturalistic solutions kept saying, particularly when it related to biology and psychology, that we knew generally how things worked, or probably worked, we were just filling in the gaps.

“But is it true?” Phil would ask his critics and most often this question was ignored. He was happy to apply the same question to ideas he hoped would work out like the different notions floated by the growing number of scientists, philosophers, and thinkers associated (even loosely) with the intelligent design movement.

This is why he thought the “design” movement could and must remain a “big tent.” If one is not persuaded by the answers given by the majority, then one need not settle on one alternative set of answers. Instead, Phil sought the liberty for ideas to be pursued: that was at the heart of his intellectual program.

In his last call, Phillip E. Johnson was pressing educational reforms and alternatives. He knew, as he had always known, that though the truth is out there, along with goodness and beauty, truth had to be found and incarnated in new generations of scholars, activists, and educators.

Why education? As a theist, Phil was also a realist in the sense he wanted ideas applied to the world as the world is. As a man of ideas interested in how those ideas interact with matter and energy, he supported an open philosophy of science to find some better answers.

Phil knew that the quest for truth needed more minds. Nothing made him happier than seeing new people come to the Discovery Institute, or a Torrey Honors chum go on to finish graduate level work and pursue ideas. To the end, he was pressing for those of us pursuing the Constantine strategy, theistic realism applied to all of education in a kindergarten through college program, to multiply as quickly as possible. He was not bothered that all of those students did not come to the same conclusions, even his (tentative) conclusions. Instead, he was gratified to have helped set them free from the tyranny of a closed philosophy of science.

Truth should be pursued. As a result, he would often say with a puckish smile, “If we win, we shall,” meaning his friends, “have to switch sides as our side grows too powerful and so stale.” He did not live to see design or any of his educational offspring with that problem of success, but he was hopeful to the last day.

On the Thursday before he died, he was brimming with ideas confident as only a Socrates can be at the edge of the unknown that truth will prevail. He was fond of his intellectual children, proud where he thought they had surpassed him, with the confidence of a theist that God will protect the right. He even asked where I thought things were and was gratified to hear of a growing generation pursuing theist realism: his great passion. We must bear his going hence knowing the time was ripe: we honor him best by courageously examining his ideas, applying those that work, discarding those that become dated.

His was a mind awake that now has come to full awareness.

Thank God for Phillip E. Johnson.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

November 23, 2019

A Eulogy for Phillip E. Johnson

Next Post

November 25, 2019 The Thanksgiving for Gives and Takes (Blessed be!)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Apostle" mean in Greek?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Preacher Elder King One who is sent

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »