BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
- Home
- Evangelical
- Shades of Andy Johnson- Love or Hate It: Our Official Foreign Policy Comes from Our Elected POTUS
Shades of Andy Johnson- Love or Hate It: Our Official Foreign Policy Comes from Our Elected POTUS
Last updated on: October 14, 2019 at 8:56 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds
Shades of Andy Johnson- Love or Hate It: Our Official Foreign Policy Comes from Our Elected POTUS 2019-10-14T20:56:10-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
Today the New York Times sent me an update on impeachment that said:
What Ms. Hill likely helped outline today was the difference between our official foreign policy and the real foreign policy. Fiona Hill is the National Security Council official who, until her departure this summer, was supposed to be in charge of Ukraine policy and advise the president on it. But what we will likely learn from her appearance is that she was largely cut out of it. There’s this other foreign policy going on, directed by other people like Gordon Sondland, who were working on parts of this Ukraine policy that she never knew about.
I did not vote for Mr. Trump in 2016, but this is a very bad take on the part of the New York Times and the person they interviewed.
Why?
Our elected President sets our foreign policy not the President’s advisors. Our “official foreign policy” is not what an official says it is. Instead, our official foreign policy is what the chief executive officer of the United States, the President, determines. Congress can block financing his ideas or refuse to pass treaties, but the President is the “real” and “official” foreign policy.
An “official” may be appointed by the President, but this official is “in charge” of Ukrainian policy only when she or he agrees with the President. The notion that “there’s this other foreign policy going on” is nonsense. There is the Administration policy and what some workers for the Administration would like to see. Many have titles that would make a person think they are “in charge,” but if anyone thinks Lincoln did not run the Civil War, that someone with the “title” did (Scott? McClellan?), they don’t know American politics.
The appointee proposes, the President disposes. If Americans do not like this foreign policy, they can vote for a new President every four years. If the Congress is concerned enough, then Congress can impeach and remove the President.
We have been here before now. Congress passed a law trying to keep the execrable Andrew Johnson from removing his Cabinet members by passing the Tenure of Office Act. He removed his Cabinet officials anyway, insisting on being President, and the House of Representatives impeached him. He was acquitted, in part, because the Senate wisely saw that the President might be a drunk, a racist, and an ambitious fool, but he was President. He had a right to his people and the legislative branch could not run the executive.
The American people sent Andy Johnson packing in the next election, electing the anti-Klan US Grant.
Whatever should be done with our President, he is still our President until he is not. He is the chief executive officer and sets our foreign policy. To manage “around him” is to undermine the Republic. One might think, mayhap one should think, that the President is worse. Tu quoque is still fallacious.
Andrew Johnson was bad, but that did not justify Congress destroying the Constitution to remove him. So the New York Times and the House cannot pretend there is a “real” foreign policy apart from the decision of the President of the United States of America.
Previous Post

October 13, 2019
Courage <->Love (It’s a Biconditional Thing)
Next Post

October 15, 2019 Go to the Countryside . . . At Least for a Time
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized
Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
How was Elijah taken up to Heaven?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Carried by angels Chariot of fire After his passing After his walk with God
Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds
Related posts from Eidos
Yet I Love Her: History and the Church
He Thought He was Right: Liberality Must Kiss...
Prayer for a Just Peace in Europe
The Ad Celebrating Greece that Facebook Will Not...
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...
This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....
How the author of the world's best hymn...
I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...
Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...
What About the Trees? Another Living Parable
After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...
Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...
Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...
Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...
view all Evangelical blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In










