Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
The Love of Learning (Guest Voice Jake Carr)

The Love of Learning (Guest Voice Jake Carr)

Last updated on: July 19, 2019 at 5:40 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

The Love of Learning (Guest Voice Jake Carr) 2019-07-17T19:49:53-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I asked for new voices and Jake Carr stepped up . . . Mr. Carr graduated from Biola University and the Torrey Honors Institute in 2015. His is currently working towards a PhD in Philosophy and Education at Teachers College, Columbia University. Learning and teaching are his greatest loves, save only the love for his wife, Dawnielle, and his son, Rémi.

Mr. Carr take the wheel:

The following quotation is from Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy, edited by Philip J. Ivanjoe and Bryan W. Van Norden.

Analect 6.3
Duke Ai asked [Confucius], “Who among your disciples might be said to love learning?”
Kongzi [Confucius] answered, “There was one named Yan Hui who loved learning. He never misdirected his anger, and never made the same mistake twice. Unfortunately, his allotted lifespan was short, and he has passed away. Now that he is gone, there are none who really love learning – at least, I have yet to hear of one.”

No school should exist without a Yan Hui award. Any student worthy of it would outshine the Valedictorian a hundred fold.

Confucius gives two signs by which we can recognize the true love of learning. Yan Hui had both. He never misdirected his anger, and he never made the same mistake twice.

Misdirected anger?

Any instance of anger involves 1) A judgement that sees a particular act as wrong, 2) A painful disturbance of feelings, and 3) A desire for vindicatio, where vindicatio is understood to be pursuit of redress, or punishment.

In order to never misdirect anger, Yan Hui must have always judged the just and the unjust correctly. Only a soul profoundly committed to what is good and true could ever arrive to such a state. Only a soul distinctly unselfish could ever have the purity of mind to track the just and the unjust in this way. Confucius suggests that it was love of learning that brought Yan Hui to the good, the true, and the just. No one who misdirects their anger has the true spirit of learning in them. Only those who retain the spirit of learning remain open to what’s good, true, and just, despite what the broken world with its broken people may do to them.

Yan Hui never made the same mistake twice.

Having made the same mistakes thousands of times, I called down the label of “perfectionism” on this sentiment. But that was wrong. The text says nothing of the attempt to be perfect rooted in self-will, self-shame, and external posturing. It says that when Yan Hui made a mistake, he never made it again. The perfectionist always makes the same mistakes. Instead of progress through the mistake they merely hate themselves more for having made it. They can only imagine progress in terms of becoming a new, different, better person defined in disconnect from their wrongs.

The love of learning was manifest in Yan Hui in that he was fully open to the truth of his wrongs, regardless of how painful it might have been to accept what it meant about him. I’ve seen how hard it is for someone to accept that they, yes they have committed sexual assault. They would have done anything to not use those two words in conjunction with themselves. They were as afraid of admitting to the act as to what it might mean about who they were. The true spirit of learning fully perceives and accepts the truth of one’s failings without qualification.

Still Yan Hui went further.

Not only was Yan Hui open to the truth of his wrongs, he remained open to the truth of them.

To never make the same mistake again, Yan Hui engaged in an active recalling of the truth about himself. He moved through his life in the light of what he knew his failings were. Many of us repeat the same sins, the same faulty thought patterns, or the same relational mistakes. It’s usually after a committed wrong that one wonders, “How do I find myself here again?” We are surprised and puzzled, like somebody who wakes up from an unplanned stupor. The truth is, we are unwilling to remain awake to the truth through an active memory. The spirit of true learning desires to keep every discovered truth close to one’s heart and mind. If one can continuously recall and remain open to the truth, its power can guide.

Last, Yan Hui maintained a willingness to change. Without the willingness to change, one can never be said to love learning. Our learning is evidenced by our deeds lining up with what we know, and we always allude to knowing more than our practices testify to. But not Yan Hui. We know Yan Hui loved learning precisely because his practices continued to align with what he took to be the true and the just.

In his time, Yan Hui was the only person who truly could be said to love learning. His profound openness to what was true and just gave him the power to never misdirect his anger. His profound acceptance and recollection of the truth of his mistakes, combined with a willingness to change in accordance to them, gave him the power to never make the same mistake twice. Only a great love of learning could have brought about these things.

It may be that no student in our generation will love learning as Yan Hui did. But if the student should arrive, any community of learning should be prepared to give them the highest honors

Education

On Education

Previous Post

July 18, 2019

Hope in God, A Reasonable Act (Habakkuk)

Next Post

July 20, 2019 The Problem Is Easy, the Virtue of Moderation is Hard

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the last judge of Israel and also a prophet?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nathan Eli Samuel Saul

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »