Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Knowing and not Knowing: An Idea Might Not Have Those Consequences

Knowing and not Knowing: An Idea Might Not Have Those Consequences

Last updated on: July 22, 2019 at 9:55 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

Knowing and not Knowing: An Idea Might Not Have Those Consequences 2019-07-22T09:55:37-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Sometimes ideas have consequences: good and bad. Often people who hate an idea will pretend that an idea has consequences, but it does not. An idea might have consequences, just not those consequences.

This is an another important thing to know! Here is a common example I often meet in the wilds of social media.

Suppose a person, after careful thought, decides she knows an idea to be true: “Heaven exists and knowing Jesus is the only way to go to Heaven.” I am supposing this to be true, not arguing for it here. Christian theologians and philosophers have made arguments for this idea, received from (what we think) is Divine Revelation.

Suppose this idea is true for the sake of argument. A critic will claim as a result: “You must know all kinds of other things!” and then suggest those other things are either obviously false or wrongheaded. This might be right: some ideas have consequences that show an idea to be very unlikely true or at least deeply troubling.

That’s a good reason to go look at that idea more closely. However, sometimes the critic has made a leap from what I know to something that does not follow!

Take the case of Heaven and Jesus.

I have been told (by a critic) that if I believe that Jesus is the only way to Heaven, then I must know that he (the critic) is not going to Heaven.

The critic will often go out of his way to show he does not know Jesus. He will assert (even if only for the sake of his argument) that Jesus does not exist, blaspheme Jesus, and deny that Heaven exists. He will state that if Heaven exists, he does not want to go there. Following all this, he will ask why a loving God would send someone who merely lacks belief from going to Heaven. If he is a nice chap, he will point out that as a nice chap (at least as nice as I am), this seems very harsh, since he has thought as hard about it as he is capable.

There are many ways one might respond, but the best sort of response is to see if the critic is right assuming everything he says about himself is true. Let’s grant he has engaged in utterly sincere intellectual activity and has examined the best arguments for Christianity, Heaven, and Jesus. Let us assume he is merely unpersuaded and has no other (bad motive) for rejecting Jesus. Let’s assume he is enormously nicer than anyone else I know. He is saintly with divine sanctification.

The critic is a moral paragon who rejects Jesus while doing the best he can to examine the claims of Christ. (Surely some such person has existed, even if not this critic?)

The critic has still failed. Why?

I still know nothing and cannot know anything about his eternal destiny. I cannot possibly know or judge the state of his soul in eternity.

First, the critic may not believe now, but he has time ahead of him. Even if a second after saying his worst blasphemy, he dies, there is the moment of death. What happens then?

We do not know.

However, if we have supposed God exists and is good and everything else the critic asserts, we might believe God will clarify the whole situation perfectly at the moment. We don’t know if God does, but given the assumptions of the critic and traditional Christain theology, surely God must. God is just, God will damn no man merely out of ignorance (we are assuming). Yet “no” means “no” and God would not force anyone to love him.

Assuming the critic is the perfect truth seeker he claims to be, my assumption is that he would turn to God. I even have reasonable hope this is true. God does not desire anyone to perish and so I must not desire this either.

“Ah,” the critic says, “don’t you think anyone is in Hell? Who would reject bliss?”

Here I must say: “I don’t know. I hope I would not.” Yet the critic is too hasty. I know people over a lifetime to get ever more stuck in their ways. The older I get the more I hate the vices of my youth, but some might not go that way. Perhaps, they become stuck in them and justify them. Maybe they say “no” as they run out of time into timeless eternity.

Assuming they had perfect clarity of the consequences, “no meaning no,” then a choice has been made. That the result is awful is not God’s fault if God has made this clear. Maybe I am cynical, but I have no trouble believing somebody will make that choice. If so, no Heaven for that sad soul.

Maybe. Maybe not.

The point is simple: I know Jesus is the only way, but have not the faintest clue who found the way. I know many who look like they are following Jesus are not. I was once that way, through self-deception. (God have mercy!) Mayhap’s many who look like they are not following Jesus are, through the work of the Holy Spirit, being prepared to accept Christ.

I do not know. The critic does not know. Nothing about what I believe means the critic is surely damned. I need to recall what I don’t know!

Of course, the critic is unwise to deny reality, very unwise. He might be preparing his soul badly. If I bet, wouldn’t I bet the critic is damned?

Maybe, but why make such a bet? I don’t wish anyone in particular to miss Heaven. I would hope everyone would choose God, though I know (through Divine Revelation) many will not. Who will miss out? We are told by Jesus that many we think are “in” aren’t and many we think our “out” are “in!”

So it goes.

My job is to witness to the truth, to urge friends to embrace the truth, not to guess who has done so or not. I am not the Judge.

Apologetics

Pop Culture

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

July 20, 2019

The Problem Is Easy, the Virtue of Moderation is Hard

Next Post

July 22, 2019 We Should Not Wish to Own the David (Florence should keep it.)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Three friends came to comfort but ended up accusing. A fourth spoke with more wisdom. What were their names in order of arrival?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eliphaz, Bildad, Zophar, and Elihu Elihu, Zophar, Bildad, and Eliphaz Bildad, Eliphaz, Elihu, and Zophar Zophar, Elihu, Eliphaz, and Bildad

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »