Upstart Crow (A Review of Sorts)

Last updated on: May 24, 2019 at 10:07 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Upstart Crow (A Review of Sorts) 2019-05-24T22:07:59-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Upstart Crow made me laugh so much I began to wonder: how could any show be this witty so often? And then we moved into later episodes and I saw that the idea began to fray and genius fade . . . So I appreciated the humor of the early episodes even more.

The early episodes feel like a funny, humane literature major somehow got permission to make a show that depends on knowing Shakespeare, the history around Shakespeare, and bizarre ideas about Shakespeare. If you think Bacon was Shakespeare, then you will be fried, stinking fried, by the wits and wags working on this occasionally wonderful show. At some points the references to plays and sonnets by The Upstart Crow (Shakespeare!), come fast enough that an episode needs repeat viewing . . . At least for this non-literature major.

The acting is solid, if the scenery ends up a bit chewed.

Some writer, some almost-genius, knows why we love Shakespeare and also why we sometimes suspect our love of the Bard is imposed on us by our teachers, curriculum, and the orthodoxy that Shakespeare just is great. If of a certain age or social class, we were taught to love Shakespeare and so we go on loving him, even when his plots are absurd and his dialog stilted. Every so often, we wonder and so indulge professional Shakespeare debunker, the critic who (each generation has one) snorts that Shakespeare is not so great.

Except. . . Except. . .

Just when our cynicism about the Upstart Crow is most triumphant, comes some dialog, monologue, or plot twist in the plays to remind us that WIlliam Shakespeare, Billy Shakes, is still the master. Upstart Crow understands the false piety, the facile critics, and the the genius of Shakespeare and plays with all of it.

There are moments when dialog from actual Shakespeare is used in Upstart Crow to mock the Bard and then nod to brilliance. They lampoon the master, but then allow his language to master us. A few scenes in the show move from rollicking low-brow comedy to beauty in an instant: just like Shakespeare’s plays, often using bits of Shakespeare.

That’s great writing using his great writing in new ways! As writer happy to appropriate good ideas in other writers, Shakespeare would have approved.

Like Shakespeare, the humor on the show is bawdy, but unlike actual Shakespeare, increasingly filled with the BBC’s version of what Moral Britain Must Think Today. The show mocks those Puritans who tried to close or censor Shakespeare, winking knowingly toward the Victorians who preferred bowdlerizations to the pure Bard, yet produces a good bit of modern clean up, making sure Shakespeare is not too offensive to Oxbridge sensibilities.

There are some clever attacks that go the other way, but this is mostly anti-Brexit, Labour, or at least Lib-Dem, and post-Christian. Yet because Shakespeare was a Christian, a real man living in a Christian society, they do not just poke at the (real) intolerance or misogyny of the times. The beauty of Christian Britain is there in Shakespeare’s own words.

The joyful anachronism is half the comedy, but then falls flat when made didactic. Taming of the Shrew is taken on in obvious ways, some very funny, some funny like a homily from a progressive teacher who has more wit than most. Any chance the viewer may miss the point (the play is offensive) are not taken. For example, the play (as performed on the show) is enjoyed by exactly no women in the theater audience, something not true in any performance of Shrew I have ever seen in the uncensored world.

There are times when it begins to feel like the writers have been forced to insert Very Special Episode material to keep telling all the jokes they do tell.

Does the juvenile crudity increase by the third set of shows? Maybe. The writers certainly overuse some originally funny bits (Bolingbrook gets a whole new meaning!). Overuse kills the double entendres as the viewer just starts hearing the sex reference directly.

This is a show that might have been better with one series, not three. If you have a high tolerance for British humor of the twenty-first century (with all the liabilities), then the show is very funny.

Watch the show.

Art

Culture

Pop Culture

Previous Post

May 23, 2019

The Character Is the Thing (Heraclitus)

Next Post

May 25, 2019 Fight for the Law as for the Wall (Heraclitus)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was primary method of debt resolution in Biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Slavery Fine payment Community service Public trial

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »