Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Those Illiterates!

Those Illiterates!

Last updated on: March 4, 2019 at 10:14 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Those Illiterates! 2019-03-04T22:14:49-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

On Literacy

I am just old enough to have met men, and they were mostly men, who did not read much, if at all, but were very bright and successful members of society.

You did not have to be (very) literate to run a business or a farm for much of human history. The West Virginia of my childhood prized literacy and education, but not everyone had the same chances. Some successful people simply never learned to read or learned to read very little.

As a result, I learned from experience the power of an oral tradition: story telling from father to son, looking for patterns not words, seeing differently. It was splendid, an aural and oral culture that sharpened wit and memory. The oral culture that made this possible is mostly dead.

Sometimes I meet people who assume an illiterate is dumb, dubious, or dogmatic.

Leaving aside the class bigotry, hard though that might be: It’s just not true.

First Nations (American Indians), the Greeks who shaped the Iliad, my West Virginia roots had powerful cultures without being totally reliant on written words. Christians are people of a Book, but that did not mean everyone could read the Book. Of course as a result of the Bible, wherever Christianity went literacy followed, but not everyone wished to read or needed to read.

There was power in listening and speaking. Plato got this in his worries about books at the end of Phaedrus. Literacy gives us more than it costs us, but it costs us something. There was a shrewdness and intellectual skills (orality and aurality) we have lost.

I love books, I have founded one great books undergraduate program and a great books college. Yet I also love oral culture. Both have value and both can be brilliant.

This obvious truth came to mind in a chat with a thoughtful critic.

On Those Illiterate Farmer Peasants and Christianity

He was wondering about the New Testament use of “up” for the location of heaven. Did Jesus ascend at the speed of light? If so, why can’t we see him with a telescope? Didn’t the Biblical writers have an easily falsifiable view of the cosmos?

My response may have been less charitable than it should have been. The Bible is a collection of books spanning thousands of years. There is no single dominant cosmology in the many places, times, and people that wrote Bible books. Take the cosmology in Plato’s Timaeus.*

Plato has a finite, but huge, cosmos shaped like a ball. Heaven, to the extent he has heaven, is not so much “up” as another dimension, a deeper reality. Plato wrote this four hundred years before Jesus. When the Old Testament had to be turned into Greek, the translators were influenced by and used Plato’s vocabulary from Timaeus. If you read a Greek Genesis in the time of Jesus or Paul, you were reading Genesis influenced by Plato!

Maybe.

Or maybe some of the many alternative cosmologies were in mind for any particular New Testament writer. It’s hard to know. How do you know what the writer had in mind?

There is an obvious retort and my interlocutor made it. Why would the illiterate peasants, including Jesus, know any of this?

Leave aside for a moment that the Gospels show Jesus as literate. Assume the worst: nobody, including Jesus, could read.

The first difficulty is that this, for contemporary readers, becomes an IQ test. They must have been credulous and stupid if illiterate. This, as we have seen, is just wrong. In the ancient world opportunity for literacy was limited and the necessity of literacy was limited. Most people did not have a chance for an education nor did they need it in their daily lives.

So where does that leave Jesus?

Assume the “worst” case: almost nobody, including Jesus, was literate. So what?

They could have been brilliant. They need not have been credulous.

Scholarship, even skeptical scholarship knows a highly educated man, Paul, was writing letters (epistles) by 50 AD. Within seventeen years of the death of Jesus, a highly trained rabbi was writing with other Christians very complex, rhetorically powerful, philosophical letters.

In the ancient world, if you wrote a letter, you either did so yourself or hired someone to do it. If you read a letter, you either did so yourself or you hired someone to do it.

So when it comes to understanding the books of the New Testament: we are dealing with the literate producing material that could only be directly consumed by the literate. Paul was writing to someone who could read and explain what he wrote.

What does this mean?

Christians (for all we know) could have been illiterate to an extreme, but they could not have been entirely so. Paul (or his scribe) wrote to be read by someone! Here is the interesting thing: in a reading optional society, the illiterate always consumed a book in the presence of the literate! One could ask this . . . Elder . . . What the epistle or book meant. He or she was there, because otherwise the book could not be read.

This means the worldview of the illiterate while unknowable is not so important. Recall we cannot know with high certainty what they thought as they (mostly) did not leave written records! Yet this need not mean “stupid” views, just unknowable ones. They also had access to readers when they wanted to hear a book or letter. Those readers had access to any number of views of reality.

In short, the books of the New Testament were written within two decades of Jesus’ death with the expectation someone could read them. If someone could read them and explain them, then the “ignorant peasants” had access to a literate explanation of a text in the person reading the book to them.

If Fred is illiterate, he can still hear a book. If Fred doesn’t get it, he can ask the reader. He gets some of the best of both the literate and oral culture worlds. After all ‘illiteracy” in some cultures is access to a beautiful, shrewd, practical culture not based on reading! Fred has it all.

Christianity could have been born in a world with few readers (scholars dispute the percentages) and still be people of the Book, because you can grasp a book without reading it.

Thank God for audible.com! Now imagine having the Audible reader there with you to explain. You don’t need massive literacy yourself, because the Reader is there to fill in your gaps. Sometimes this goes wonderfully well and I assume sometimes badly, but people of the Book get the Book through the literate!

Our Arrogant Post-Literacy May Be Worse

In fact, there is a danger in our present post-literacy.

Those people I knew who could not read often hid it. They learned to “fake it” and sign the invoices for their (prosperous) business. They knew what they did not know and gained their theological knowledge from pastors. They might listen and disagree: after all they were shrewd and logical.

Yet they would not have set themselves up as Bible scholars!

After all, they already were hiding, without lying but artfully, a lack of literacy. They had a modesty about what they knew, because of a lack of credentials. This modesty was, if anything greater than it needed to be, since common sense, logical thinking, and the training of an oral culture often left the the “uncredentialed” better able to understand a thing than they knew.

Too much modesty is not a feature of social media opining. There we have people with no particular skills in reading a text opining because they can “read.” Many of us learned to read, but now read Tweets and headlines. Our reading skills decay and so I meet many people who read right well in their fields, but whose general literacy is less than my college students!

If your general reading skills (outside your job) have decayed, maybe Romans seems “silly” to you, because you can’t read at a tenth grade reading level anymore. This leaves aside the skills necessary to understand an old book in a different language from another culture.

Many of us are post-literate in anything where the vocabulary is outside what we use to do our job. Doubt this? Test yourself. Pull out an old college humanities paper you wrotein the day and see if you still “get it.” Skills not going forward, go backward. As a result, even the highly literate in a specialized field should beware opining in another field. We no longer easily keep up a general literacy.

Try telling that to a medical doctor. He assumes that any ancient book is plain to him, because he can read, can’t he?

Well, no.

He does not know how to read ancient books, the original tongue, or the genre. He is nearly illiterate when it comes to the book, but he is highly credentialed (in another field) so off he goes.

This multiplies error.

Of course, much of Scripture is plain to the well read person. Sadly, most Americans are not well read outside of our niche. We forget this and so opine freely.

This is the lout who does not know a chiasm from a chasm so falls into interpretive error.

And yes, this is why seminary trained pastors are vital (generally).

——————————————

*I use this example because I have written a book on it and it is relevant to the early New Testament era.

Obviously, in a culture that forces nearly everyone who can learn to read to learn to read, and where jobs are made dependent on literacy, one finds “smarter” people in certain jobs. The world was not this way when I was a boy and it was certainly not that way in the ancient world

Apologetics

Culture

On Books

Previous Post

March 3, 2019

Agatha Christie: Is she on your woman author’s list? If not why not? Or “I love Agatha Christie.”

Next Post

March 5, 2019 Joan was Triumphant!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did God change Abram’s name to?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaac Jacob Moses Abraham

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »