Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
The Fall of Gondolin (JRR Tolkien, edited by Christopher Tolkien)

The Fall of Gondolin (JRR Tolkien, edited by Christopher Tolkien)

Last updated on: January 11, 2019 at 12:49 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

The Fall of Gondolin (JRR Tolkien, edited by Christopher Tolkien) 2019-01-11T00:49:41-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Fall of Gondolin is for the serious reader of JRR Tolkien’s mythology, but not one so serious that he is offended by the “Elvish” of the Peter Jackson movies. This is for the readers who takes Tolkien seriously, but is not a scholar of the series.

Not everything Christopher Tolkien has edited from his father’s work has been so easy. Christopher Tolkien has given us works of scholarship showing the development of his father’s ideas spanning an entire history of the making of Middle Earth that will be the subject of dissertations on Christopher Tolkien’s choices.

If you thought the Lord of the Rings trilogy was wonderful and the Silmarillion difficult, a little disappointing in lack of literary polish, then most of what Christopher Tolkien has revealed about his father’s work is not for you. That’s most of my students. There are a few who study the making of the most important fantasy world this side of Atlantis carefully and for those students the slow arrival of a new History has been a scholarly Christmas treat.

I am between those readers: caring enough (due to an interest in Plato and myth) to read the books, not enough to master the content. Tolkien scholars (and super-fans) know the material and one is bound to make an error when commenting on the canon. When errors are made, emails follow. I proceed with caution.

The last two books from Christopher Tolkien, he claims the last two he will release, have taken an approach to the unpublished works that is (for me) less for the scholar (or super-fan) and more for the serious reader. One tale is studied and alternatives are given in turn with Christopher Tolkien giving his insights (sometimes personal) into what his father was doing as he created the story.

The Fall of Gondolin is the story of the overthrow of the hidden Elvish city in Lord of the Rings as a distant tragedy. The Elves face ruin at the hands of Melko, an evil so great Sauron is a mere lieutenant, but the great Elf city of Gondolin has defied detection abd so destruction. These Gnomes (as Tolkien calls them) hide and thrive, refusing to risk the end of their beautiful city even when challenged to come forth by a friendly god. It is no spoiler to say: Gondolin falls.

The story is beautifully told and several passages related to the doom of the city achieve some of the best mythic writing in all of Tolkien.

Yet Ildril spoke against this, and persuaded the lords that they trust not to magic of that way that had aforetime shielded it from discovery: ‘for what magic stands if Gondolin be fallen?’

If mythic writing (Plato’s Timaeus) is a genre you enjoy or study, this sentence will haunt.

The great, beautiful Elvish home hidden and guarded by great walls and gates is annihilated. A great lesson of the Tolkien canon is confirmed again: Nothing endures in this life and no beauty can hide from evil. Goodness grows or if it stagnates the good is corrupted, like a cult in a compound or falls to evil in spectacular failure.

Christopher Tolkien has produced a short book centered on Gondolin’s awesome doom.

The book is beautifully illustrated by Alan Lee and great care was put into the production (paper and typeface). I hesitate to point to an error. On page 291, I read: “They dwelt in Gondor a year, and it is said that at this time Hurin learned something of the counsels and purposes of Turgon: for he had a great liking for them and wished to keep them in Gondolin.”

Isn’t “Gondor” a jarring error in this passage? Or is this usage based on a fact I am missing (as a non-scholar)? I ask, because this work feels a bit hasty overall, rushed, or not quite up to the care one expected from Christopher Tolkien. The amount of new content compared to the hardcover price seems less than we have grown to expect.

Regardless, no father ever left his literary estate in better hands than Christopher Tolkien. He has edited his father’s work and so (indirectly) in the choices he has made become almost a co-author and creator. The Silmarillion should someday have Christopher Tolkien added as a co-author* as the editing choices and new material added to smooth out the unfinished manuscripts is very great. When all of JRR Tolkien’s notes and materials become public, other scholars will make different choices about what the great man meant and Christopher Tolkien’s “JRR Tolkien” will be one of many scholarly options, even if he always has a privileged place.

That’s how scholarship works.

Meanwhile, for those of us, his faithful readers, that mostly read of Middle Earth for pleasure and wisdom, The Fall of Gondolin is worth the time. There is pleasure in the hardcover and wisdom in the text. JRR Tolkien was no fan of modernity, but he knew that if the magic of Gondolin could not stand against evil, then no magic or hiding could stand.

Better to venture forth like Samwise and Frodo and do the job of our age than trust to the long walls of Gondor . . . Or as the Elves did earlier in the hidden city of Gondolin.

Wisdom.

Let us attend.

————————————-

*I would suggest: The Silmarillion by JRR Tolkien with Christopher Tolkien.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

January 8, 2019

Plato, Christianity, and Keeping a Republic

Next Post

January 10, 2019 Roots of My Platonism, or Neo-Platonism, or Neo-Platonic Christianity, or As You Will

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaiah Jesus Elijah Paul

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »