Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
You are no match for ME! (Summer in the Republic 34)

You are no match for ME! (Summer in the Republic 34)

Last updated on: July 10, 2018 at 10:11 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

You are no match for ME! (Summer in the Republic 34) 2018-07-10T10:11:18-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Winning is not a winning move if we are wrong.

That’s obvious, because most of us do not mean to be wrong. We are wrong accidentally. After all, we love the truth, believe in reason . . . And stuff. Maybe. Or perhaps we are being too easy on our motives. If we are fitting in with our team, supporting opinions of the people we admire, then perhaps we are deceiving ourselves. This, I am told, is easy to do.

We think we are standing for the Truth, but in reality we are able to laugh at just the right time at a late night gathering of our friends. Our stand for truth is moderating, mediated by a natural desire to fit into our social set.

This is not bad.

Breathed a man with a soul so solipsistic, that he did not care for good company?

We are right to worry that if we stake out a position alone we are merely cranks, eccentric fools, who think we are right when we are merely deluded. A good general indicator that we are not in a kooky corner is having some mates.

This is good, but not good enough, because the popular cause is often the wrong cause. The voice of our friends is often the voice of the world, the flesh, and the devil in collegial tones. The great danger for intellectual types, those of us who love words, is that we confuse winning an argument for Team Smart with being right. Imagine having the right tone, the correct opinions, but being wrong. If someone forced us to think too hard about our error, that might be painful as we would be forced to choose between two goods: getting along and being right.

That’s an easy choice in theory-land, but harder in reality. Plato exposed this fault in his Republic when Socrates was attacked by the friend of tyrants, Thrasymachus. Plato shows Socrates not at his best, struggling to understand justice. Thrasymachus sees his weakness and pounces. Socrates wants justice, Thrasymachus wishes to win a debate.

Thrasymachus says:

Now go ahead and quibble and set out your snares. I am not afraid of you for the simple reason that you are no match for me.

The urge to win and the knowledge that Socrates cannot beat him in a debate makes Thrasymachus (falsely) confident

He has forgotten something important: being wrong, being very wrong, is not good! He might win a round with Socrates, but if he does, if he is still wrong, then the harm of his error will eat away at his soul. There is no long term gain in winning, if the cost of winning is going the wrong way.

Being lost is not made happier if you wander about with a debate trophy.

A great mistake we might make is teaching our younglings to win debates at the cost of ignoring intellectual integrity or graciousness. Socrates is kind, even while arguing. Socrates prefers truth to winning, even if that means losing. What does it profit a person to win a debate, but lose the truth?

The man dedicated to winning, sees discussion as a potential trap. The person who loves wisdom sees discussion as a chance to learn. What will we do?

We can decide to take our truth, as we see truth, to the marketplace and see what happens or we could bash our foes with rhetoric and win. There is nothing wrong with winning, with persuasive speech, but only if it is used in the service of truth. I was once in a debate that was going very well, but my opponent began to manifest signs of illness. He was physically sick. That was the time to back off.

Winning was not worth the price of making a hurting person hurt more. This infuriated my host, but I am not sorry. I was there to learn and my opponent was too sick to advance that process. Winning in such a situation seemed like boorishness, losing my soul.

I have not always done so well, the joy of winning is natural. There is nothing wrong with winning . . . It is winning at the cost of truth that is the problem. Persuasive speech is good, but not if it obscures the truth.

God help us.

———————————————-

*I begin an informal summer reading of Republic using Scott/Sterling (a new translation for me). Part 1. Part 2. Part 3. Part 4. Part 5. Part 6. Part 7. Part 8. Part 9. Part 10. Part 11. Part 12. Part 13. Part 14. Part 15. Part 16. Part 17. Part 18. Part 19. Part 20. Part 21. Part 22. Part 23. Part 24. Part 25. Part 26. Part 27. Part 28. Part 29. Part 30. Part 31. Part 32. Part 33. Part 34.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

July 9, 2018

Socrates and Mister Rogers Neighborhood (Summer in the Republic 33)

Next Post

July 11, 2018 If I concede, I can be saved. (Summer in the Republic 35)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the last king of Judah before the Babylonian exile?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Jehoiakim Zedekiah Hezekiah

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »