Do Justice, Know Justice (Summer in the Republic 11)

Last updated on: June 15, 2018 at 4:08 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Do Justice, Know Justice (Summer in the Republic 11) 2018-06-15T16:08:44-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A small child can get cookies from the cookie jar, even if she should not, without being able to define “cookie” or “cookie jar.” She can know that she should not eat the cookie without a full ethical philosophy. You do not have to define a thing to be able to talk about it meaningfully.

I once debated an atheist stuck on finding a definition for God as if the definition was the essence of knowing God existed. We can experience an object without being able to define the object: cookies, cookie jars, justice, and God.

You can do justice and know God without being able to define either term rigorously. What good is a definition then? A definition can help clarify more complicated issues. In the case of the debate, I was arguing for God as the greatest possible being. This is consistent with the God of the Bible, but need not be the God of the Bible. We could experience God without this definition and even rationally believe God exists, but when asked questions, the definition helped limit the discussion in positive ways. We could discuss the existence of God (in general) and not other aspects of God’s existence (if God is identical to the Christian God).

To take our simple example: a chef might toy with our idea of “cookie” to broaden the food group! By refining her understanding of what she meant by “cookie,” she could try new things or improve old ones. Ethics make definitions even more important. Life gets tricky as we grow up. A general sense of “cookie” or ethics might carry a five year old forward, but cause problems to a fifty year old.

Socrates often asked questions about what his friends meant by the words they used. This was fair in most cases, because the men were teachers who claimed to know the definitions. Second, Socrates was not asking for a definition of justice as if without one nobody could know justice, but to get a firmer grasp on justice.

Talking to a friend nearing death, a man named Cephalus, Socrates was pleased to learn that his friend was using his money to pay off his debt. Cephalus also was happy that having money made it easier for him to tell the truth. A good person will know that he should pay his debts and tell the truth . . .generally. What if a friend loans his axe to us and then goes crazy? If he comes and asks for his axe, should we give it back? Should we tell him the truth about where the axe is? If we love our friend, we will not!

Socrates points out to Cephalus;

Then we must say that telling the truth and repaying one’s debts cannot serve as an adequate definition of justice.

Socrates is hoping for a more general idea of what justice is that will help Socrates and the young men in the room not to make mistakes. Can Cephalus help him find it? Cephalus has no interest in helping. Like many people, such discussions bore him, though at least he is not irritated! Many people get so frustrated with a request for clarification that they kill the philosopher who asks.

Socrates was one of the most famous to discover this fact.

Why?

Clarification can reveal that we know justice, but are not being just. We are hiding our injustice behind vagueness. We can separate the immigrant mother from her child, because “after all shouldn’t we obey the law?” Is this just? Generally, this is just unless the law itself is unjust! Imagine a law that said you must not pray: Christians would pray. Ask Daniel.

So what is justice? How should we treat the mother and child? Most people have the (proper) moral intuition that something is wrong with separating a mother and child without very, very powerful reasons, but our intuitions can be wrong. How can we know?

We need to discuss justice. This the rich old man Cephalus is unwilling to do. He retreats to sayings and then leaves. He does not love justice enough to clarify what he loves, but nobody in love is unwilling to discuss the object of his affections.

Let’s not get bogged down on definitions when we do not need them, but not be hasty or impatient if we do!

On Books

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

June 14, 2018

A Man of Easier Virtue (Summer in the Republic 10)

Next Post

June 16, 2018 The Wise Dad versus the Big Head Dad (Summer in the Republic 12)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am twelve stones taken from a riverbed and set up as a memorial to a miraculous crossing. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The memorial stones The Stones of remembrance Altar stones Bethel

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »