Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Watching Three Billboards with Karen Swallow Prior (with Flannery O’Connor and Buffy the Vampire Slayer!)

Watching Three Billboards with Karen Swallow Prior (with Flannery O’Connor and Buffy the Vampire Slayer!)

Last updated on: March 30, 2018 at 11:05 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

Watching Three Billboards with Karen Swallow Prior (with Flannery O’Connor and Buffy the Vampire Slayer!) 2018-03-30T11:05:08-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Some people are so interesting that anything is better if they are there to talk to you about it. Karen Swallow Prior watched the movie I wish I had seen when I went to Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri.

At the very least she has a standing offer for a glass of orange juice at The College to talk about the movie. Her review is worth reading, considering, and savoring for its own sake. She made obvious what a fine motion picture Three Billboards might have been, but I am not persuaded was. With luck, she will respond to my complaints, my mind will be changed, and I will have something new to love.* In the end, I liked her review better than the motion picture.

The central claim of Professor Prior’s review is:

It’s counterintuitive to think of film, a primarily visual medium, as literary, but understanding and appreciating Three Billboards depends on understanding how words function in the film. Even with its phenomenal casting, superb acting, fine camera work, gorgeous soundtrack, and spectacles of violence, the film is ultimately—beginning with the title—a film about words.

One strong piece of confirming evidence that this is a movie about words are the three billboards themselves with their terse messages to Ebbing. So far, so good, but before moving on to the rest of her argument let me point out the heavy burden the film has.

A medium does not (totally) control the message. Most grown-up books are about words, but they do not have to be as graphic novelists demonstrate. A very good one like Doug TenNapel can make visuals that do as much or more than the words on the page.

Tarkovsky could make films about time and as a result even introduce boredom as an important element in his movies. This is very tricky as a long sequence to show tedium could simply be a bad bit of filmmaking retconned by smart fans as intentional or brilliant.

Second, Professor Prior has noted the brilliance of the acting and visuals. These elements are natural to film as we usually see it and are very powerfully done in the movie. Even if this is a film that intends to be about words, the director/writer has chosen to allow the more cinematic elements an overwhelming presence. In fact, the acting, the personifications, were the only award winners for the film. Let me suggest that if words were the thing, the powerful characters on the screen overwhelmed the screenplay, nominated for an award but not a winner. This was a correct choice by the Academy, because the acting was better than the (sometimes) jejune philosophy and (often) offensive stereotypes.

Professor Prior answers this criticism about the characters:

But Three Billboards isn’t realism; it’s larger than life and, at times, grotesquely so. This is not straight drama; it’s (very dark) comedy.

She notes that a main character is reading an O’Connor novel. There is no doubt that the film (like most dark comedies) is sometimes larger than life. It is certainly grotesque. Symbols abound. Yet the film also plays with Southern, rural, and racial stereotypes that are very real and have done great harm to people. This can be done properly in film as Spike Lee does, but Three Billboards fails.

Why?

The stereotypes, particularly of the African-American characters (supporting roles), are not big enough or grotesque enough to avoid being merely offensive. The very best performances by the central actors are so good that realism ruins all. The very realistic sets, scenery and lush cinematography make Ebbing a place. . . too much of a place for a film that is about words.

Film is not naturally a word medium, so great care has to be taken to keep the visual, the auditory, and the acting from overwhelming the words. Flannery O’Connor works, because she is using words to write about words, so has much more control of her message. We see only what she shows us and if she moves quickly enough (and she always does) our imaginations do not fill in the scenes.

This is the difference between the horror the author of Judges “shows” and what would happen if the scenes in this book were filmed. Mel Gibson’s Passion is brilliant, but has been criticized for allowing the violence to overwhelm anything else in the film. Of course a crucifixion is violent, but the Gospels allow us to filter the details a bit and so focus on the centrality of redemption. Three Billboards is similarly violent.

Prior says of the many deaths in the film:

Three Billboards is obsessed with such bodies: dying, bleeding, burning, broken, bereaved bodies. As O’Connor wrote, “We’re all grotesque.”

The film’s visuals, like those of The Passion, border on violence porn, but unlike The Passion lack a strong enough central story to balance the graphic realism. On the whole, I think Gibson did succeed, but that Three Billboards fails, not because Gibson is necessarily a better filmmaker, but because his source material is well known and very powerful. The tale of the Christ is great plotting. As one movie said, the Gospel is The Greatest Story Ever Told. Gibson had more margin for error than an original screenplay like Three Billboards.

I agree with Prior that the foul language is not by itself a deal breaker for the film, but disagree with why. I found the language realistic for both the kids and adults, given my experience of families of a certain sort. I know these people. As a result, the profanity added to the realism. It was not grotesque, but the way trapped, hurting people I know talk.

Finally, I am thankful for the many moments of grace in the film that Prior points out that deepened my appreciation of the film in general. However, here I must make a subjective judgment about some of the symbolism. Too often these moments of grace came with symbolism that struck me as portentous as the word portentous in a film review! Maybe I have been to too many student films, but the symbolism of the film seemed too on the nose.

Three Billboards is not a bad movie, obviously the acting is world class. However, if it is a film about words, then the best word for it is: inefficacy.

Maybe.

————————————————-

*This has happened to me before now. I owe my enjoyment of Buffy the Vampire Slayer to the analysis of Professor Elizabeth Rambo. I even turned my hand to Buffy analysis.

Art

Culture

Pop Culture

Previous Post

March 29, 2018

Finding a Soul in God’s Image (Reflections on a Brothers Karamazov Discussion)

Next Post

March 31, 2018 Borrow an Umbrella (Easter When You Need Easter)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet's call included a vision of an almond branch and boiling pot?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jeremiah Isaiah Ezekiel Daniel

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »