Manners: Better Than Barbarism, Sort Of

Last updated on: February 12, 2018 at 9:25 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Manners: Better Than Barbarism, Sort Of 2018-02-12T21:25:54-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Manners” were annoying to me as a kid. This will strike nobody who went to high school with me as false. I brought sardines to lunch in our tiny school where we had our meal in the classroom. The smell would fill the room and the downside of having married a person I first met when I was in tenth grade and she was in ninth grade is knowing what people thought of my food choice.

Needless to say, she had nothing to do with fish-smell boy.

I should have thought about what my choices were doing to other people in the class. I was classless in my cluelessness and, as a result, was thought déclassé. I should have paid more attention to Jane Austen’s ideas and not just to her romance as a young reader.

Jane Austen was right to focus on manners because manners are manifest morality. They make “do unto others as you would have them to do to you” real and not abstract. If we are not careful, we treat this command of Jesus as if it means our standards should be applied to everyone in particulars: I like sardine smell so everyone will not mind. Instead, we should hear the Golden Rule as applying to generalities in life: I dislike unpleasant odors, so whenever deploying strong odors in public, I should think, ask, and be careful.

Though more useful, this helpful advice is still not enough and manners point the way: we follow social norms as much as we can to provide safe space for everyone in the community without the tyranny of government rules. Manners taught my generation that too much cologne or perfumes were rude: less was more. This social custom turns out to help the minority of people who are very sensitive to smell . . . At least somewhat.

A culture without manners always risks the tyranny of the loud offended minority: your sardines offend me so we shall pass a rule about bringing them to lunch. This rule grows over time as each person finds what offends him or her. Power instead of manners begins to dictate our social interaction and something is lost.

Instead, in a society with strong customs and manners, one knew what would be eaten, worn, or put on display. If one was upset by certain sights, sounds, or topics, then one could venture out to certain events relatively sure of safety. This allows some events to be joyful for all present without written rules. Healthy people do not hide from conflict or unpleasantness always, but manners help us prepare. A man can go to a dance knowing he will not get waylaid for his politics and to a debate knowing he almost surely will be.

Indeed, highly mannered interactions set boundaries and non-verbal means of communication that allow a “no” or “that is boorish” to be communicated clearly without words. Some people struggle with verbal communication and other people have a hard time hearing. The more the society can say: “her fan is tipped in just such a way, she does not wish to dance,” the more chances people who are decent at heart have a chance to hear.

Yet manners, as Austen shows, are no barrier to the barbarian. The person determined to undermine morality can ape the manners. Nothing is barbarian proof in this life. Society must always guard against the person who knows the rules but does not care.

When I was a boy, I thought manners too “precious” or too worried about superficialities. As an older man, I see them as creating a culture of care, of restraint, and safety without police power. Now off to read Sense and Sensiblity for class.

Spiritual Reflections

Jane Austen

Sense and Sensibility

Previous Post

February 10, 2018

Christian Victor: See You Soon, Uncle Charlie

Next Post

February 12, 2018 It’s a February 12 Kind of Day: Lincoln, Liberty, Leadership, and a New School

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Cornelius' profession?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Carpenter Fisherman Roman centurion Shepherd

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »